LEGAL CERTAINTY IN EXPRESSING OPINIONS IN PUBLIC DURING THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION ERA ACCORDING TO POSITIVE LAW IN INDONESIA AND SIYASAH DUSTURIYAH

Bambang Nurdiansyah, Sulastri Caniago, Wardatun Nabilah

Abstract


This research aims to identify and explain the forms of restrictions on freedom of expression on social media and the forms of legal certainty regarding freedom of expression according to positive law and siyasah dusturiyah. In recent years, there have been efforts to narrow the space for expressing opinions, especially through social media. Often, people who express their opinions on social media receive unfavorable treatment after expressing their views. The type of research in this thesis is normative legal research with a statute approach and case approach. The primary data sources in this research are the Quran and Sunnah, as well as laws related to the right to freedom of expression in Indonesia. The data collection technique used in this research involves library research by searching for books, articles, journals, and websites. The data analysis technique in this research is descriptive. The research results show that, first, the forms of restrictions on freedom of expression on social media can be categorized into two forms: indirect and direct. Indirectly, through ambiguous articles in the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE) and articles related to insulting the president and the government. Directly, through digital attacks, persecution, terror and intimidation, and criminal reporting or criminalization. Second, the forms of legal certainty in positive law were found to be in three forms: legal certainty guarantees through individual or group rights, legal certainty guarantees through the government's obligation to protect individuals who use their right to freedom of expression, and legal certainty in the form of sanctions against those who attempt to hinder others' freedom of expression. Third, from the perspective of siyasah dusturiyah, there is also legal certainty for freedom of expression through the right to express opinions and the obligation of rulers to protect those who express their views. Based on the research results, it was found that restrictions on freedom of expression have occurred, which will ultimately lead to authoritarian governance. This occurs due to the suboptimal performance of the government, making it averse to criticism and resorting to restricting freedom of expression.However, it prohibits excessive and wasteful consumption patterns, categorized as al-israf behavior.

Keywords


Legal Certainty; Freedom of Expressioan; Industrial Revolution

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alfiani, R., Anita Rosiana, P., Panji Dewantara, K., Budiandari, N., Dwi Julianto, R., & Gabriela Davinci Pehulisa, dan. (2020). Kebebasan Berpendapat dan Media Sosial di Indonesia. Institut Teknologi Bandung, November.

Anugrah Pradana, S., Sudirman, R., & Alvian, M. A. (2022). Kemelitan Penegakan Hukum terhadap Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat. DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 20(1), 156–168

Antaguna, N. G., & Dewi, A. A. S. L. (2023). Pembatasan Kebebasan Berpendapat dan Berekspresi di Sosial Media Berdasarkan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (ITE). KERTHA WICAKSANA, 17(2), 138-146.

Bakhtiar, N. Y., Husen, L. O., & Rinaldy Bima, M. (2020). Pemenuhan Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat Berdasarkan Undang-undang Nomor 9 Tahun 1999 Tentang Kemerdekaan Berpendapat Di Muka Umum. Pemenuhan Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat Berdasarkan Undang Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 1999 Tentang Kemerdekaan Berpendapat Di Muka Umum, 1(1), 1-18.

Effendy, H. N. (1987). Hak asasi manusia dalam islam. jakarta : Yayasan obor Indonesia-Pustaka firdaus.

Iqbal, M. (2014). fiqh siyasah, Konstektualisasi Doktrin Politik Islam. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group

Kusuma, E. (2023). Kebebasan Berpendapat dan Kaitannya Dengan Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM). Sanskara Hukum Dan HAM, 1(03), 97–101.

Khanza, F. T., & Murti, M. A. (2022). Potensi Pelanggaran Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat terhadap Delik Penghinaan Pemerintah dalam RKUHP. Jurnal Studia Legalia, 3(01), 33-39.

In’amuzzahidin, M. (2017). Konsep Kebebasan Dalam Islam. At-Taqaddum, 7(2), 259.

Mastura, S. (2021). Hak Demonstrasi Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 1998 Tentang Kemerdekaan Menyampaikan Pendapat Di Muka Umum Di Wilayah Hukum Polresta Padang Menurut Hukum Tata Negara Islam

Nasution, L. (2020). Hak kebebasan berpendapat dan berekspresi dalam ruang publik di era digital. Adalah, 4(3), 37-48.

Raharjo, S. (2014). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya. 83-84

Riyadi, E. (2018). Hukum Hak Asasi Manuia : perspektif internasional, regional, dan nasional. Depok: Rajawali press

Soeprapto, M. F. I. (2007). Ilmu Perundang-Undangan 1: Jenis, Fungsi, dan Materi Muatan. PT Kanisius.

Soeroso, R. (2011). Pengantar ilmu hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Ady Thea, DA. 2024. Dakwaan Jaksa Tak Terbukti, Haris Fatia Divonis Bebas. Hukum Online. 8 Januari. Jakarta

Batlolone, V. 2022. Catatan Komnas HAM, Pembajakan Digital Modus Terbanyak Untuk Menghalangi Kebebasan Berpendapat. Kompas. 17 Januari. Jakarta

Huda, L. 2023. Di Iintimidasi Kareana Protes Putsan MK Ketua BEM UI: Upaya Penyebaran Rasa Takut. Harian Kompas. 13 November. Jakarta

Nugraheny, DE. 2020. Serangan Digital Era Jokowi: Pelanggaran Hak Berpendapat Dan Pembungkaman Kritik. Kompas. 22 Agustus. Jakarta

Rosyani, H. 2021. 5 Kritikan Ke Jokowi Dan Pemerintah Berujung Di Kepolisian Selama 2020. Harian idntimes. 13 Februari. Halaman 2. Jakarta

Helmi, I. 2023. Haris Azhar Dituntut 4 Tahun Penjara Dalam Kasus Pencemaran Nama Baik Luhut. Harian Kompas. 13 November. Jakarta

Rudi, A. 2017. Maraknya Persekusi Dan Ancaman Terhadap Kebebasan Berpendapat. Kompas. 02 Juni. Jakarta

Rahayu, KY. 2021. Pengkritik Pemerintah Kembali Diserang Peretas. Kompas. 28 Juni. Jakarta

Rantung, RC dan Pangerang, AMK. 2022. Bintang Emon Ungkap Pernah Dapat Intimidasi Dari Orang Tak Di Kenal. Harian Kompas. 24 November. Jakarta

Rosa, N. 2023. Viral Guru Pangandaran Laporkan Pungli Akui Dapat Intimidasi. Harian Detik. 11 Mei. Jakarta

Rahayu, KY. 2023. Kasus Bima Dan Dinamika Kebebasan Berpendapat Di Media Sosial. Harian Kompas. 19 April. Jakarta




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31958/alushuliy.v3i1.12380

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Bambang Nurdiansyah, Sulastri Caniago, Wardatun Nabilah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Web Analytics

View My Stats