Pembelajaran Aktif Dalam Sains: Sebuah Kajian Persepsi Siswa dan Korelasinya Dengan Hasil Belajar
Abstract
Active learning has been shown to be beneficial in learning science. However, there is still much to learn about active learning, such as how students view the active learning process and their learning outcomes. The aim of this study is to examine students' perceptions of active learning in the context of science learning at SMA Negeri 3 Sungai Penuh and to determine its relationship with their learning outcomes. Descriptive and correlational quantitative methods were employed by including 73 MIPA Grade 12 students as respondents. A questionnaire was used to collect data on students' perceptions of active learning. Descriptive statistical analysis and Pearson correlation test were used to analyze the data. The results showed that students had a positive perception of active learning, particularly in relation to action and self-reflection, while reflection with others was scored lower. A positive and significant correlation was found between students' perception of active learning and science learning outcomes, particularly in the “doing something” and “self-reflection” indicators with physics and chemistry outcomes. This finding suggests the importance of integrating practical activities and enhancing reflective activities with others in science learning to improve students' learning outcomes
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Akinoǧlu, O., & Tandoǧan, R. Ö. (2007). The effects of problem-based active learning in science education on students’ academic achievement, attitude and concept learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75375
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. In ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report.
Cahyani, V. D., & Pranata, O. D. (2023). Studi Aktivitas Belajar Sains Siswa di SMA Negeri 7 Kerinci. Lensa (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 13(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v13i2.317
Cavanagh, A. J., Aragón, O. R., Chen, X., Couch, B., Durham, M., Bobrownicki, A., Hanauer, D. I., & Graham, M. J. (2016). Student buy-in to active learning in a college science course. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-07-0212
Chi, M. T. H. (2009). Active-Constructive-Interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 73–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Science. Second Edition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Edelson, D. C. (2001). Learning-for-Use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 355–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3<355::AID-TEA1010>3.0.CO;2-M
Fink, L. D. (2013). Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses. Jossey-Bass.
Graham, C., & Longchamps, P. (2022). Transformative Education. A Showcase of Sustainable and Integrative Active Learning. Taylor & Francis Books. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003276203
Hsu, Y.-S. (2015). Development Of Science Teachers’ TPACK: East Asian Practices (Y.-S. Hsu (ed.)). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-441-2_2
Leech, N. L., Barret, K. C., & Morgan, G. A. (2005). SPSS for Intermediate Statistics. Use and Interpretation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. All.
Lombardi, D., Shipley, T. F., Astronomy, T., Biology, T., Chemistry, T., Engineering, T., Geography, T., Geoscience, T., & Physics, T. (2021). The Curious Construct of Active Learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 22(1), 8–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620973974
Michael, J. (2006). Where’s the evidence that active learning works? American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education, 30(4), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00053.2006
Michael, J., & Modell, H. (2003). Active Learning in Secondary and College Science Classrooms. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2004.00432_10.x
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7342
Morgan, G. A., Leech, N. L., Gloeckner, G. W., & Barret, K. C. (2004). SPSS for Introductory Statistics. Use and Interpretation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. All.
OECD. (2018). The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030. In OECD Education Working Papers. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/
Pranata, O. D. (2023a). Enhancing Conceptual Understanding and Concept Acquisition of Gravitational Force through Guided Inquiry Utilizing PhET Simulation. Saintek: Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi, 15(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.31958/js.v15i1.9191
Pranata, O. D. (2023b). Physics Education Technology (PhET) as Confirmatory Tools in Learning Physics. Jurnal Riset Fisika Edukasi Dan Sains, 10(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.22202/jrfes.2023.v10i1.6815
Pranata, O. D. (2024). Students ’ understanding of vector operations : With and without physics education technology simulation. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 4(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/14633
Pranata, O. D., Sastria, E., Ferry, D., & Zebua, D. R. Y. (2023). Analysis of Students’ Emotional Intelligence and Their Relationship with Academic Achievement in Science. Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Science and Education, ICoeSSE, 395–410. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-142-5
Pranata, O. D., Seprianto, S., Adelia, I., Darwata, S. R., & Noperta, N. (2022). Science Outreach at Madrasa Menggunakan Simulasi PhET (Physics Education Technology). RANGGUK: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 02(02), 1–9.
Pranata, O. D., Sundari, P. D., & Sulaiman, D. (2023). Exploring Project-Based Learning : Physics E-Posters in Pre- Service Science Education. KONSTAN (Jurnal Fisika Dan Pendidikan Fisika), 8(2), 116–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20414/konstan.v8i02.387
Pranata, O. D., Yuliati, L., & Wartono. (2017). Concept Acquisition of Rotational Dynamics by Interactive Demonstration and Free-Body Diagram. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 11(3), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v11i3.6410
Putri, A. L., Pranata, O. D., & Sastria, E. (2024). Students Perception of Science and Technology in Science Learning: A Gender Comparative Study. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 19(1), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v19i1.6153
Utami, A. F., Pranata, O. D., & Angela, L. (2024). Analisis Tingkat Kejenuhan Siswa Sebelum , Selama , dan Setelah Pembelajaran Sains. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.8.1.1-9
Wulandari, W., & Pranata, O. D. (2023). Analisis Kecerdasan Emosional Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Sains. Diksains: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Sains, 3(2), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.33369/diksains.3.2.124-133
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31958/je.v4i1.12393
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Ogi Danika Pranata, Ramadani Ramadani, Melani Tasya Putri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
View My Stats