https://ejournal.uinmybatusangkar.ac.id/ojs/index.php/Juris <p align="justify"><strong>JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah)</strong> is peer reviewed journal by Fakultas Syari'ah Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar. The journal is aimed at spreading the research results conducted by academicians, researchers, and practitioners in the field of Sharia. In particular, papers which consider the following general topics are invited: Islamic Law/Sharia, Islamic Family Law, Islamic Economic Law, Islamic Constitutional Law, Islamic Criminal Law, and other Legal Studies. The journal is published periodically twice a year, i.e., every June (first edition) and December (second edition).</p> Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar en-US JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 1412-6109 Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:<br /><ol type="a"><li>Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a <a title="CC BY-NC-ND" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License</a> that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.</li><li>Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.</li><li>Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See <a href="http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html" target="_new">The Effect of Open Access</a>).</li></ol> https://ejournal.uinmybatusangkar.ac.id/ojs/index.php/Juris/article/view/16025 <p>This study critically examines how dominant constructions of the <em>ṣāli</em><em>ḥah </em>(pious) wife, centered on obedience to the husband as a prerequisite for marital harmony, paradoxically generate gender injustice within contemporary Muslim families—particularly among working wives. Rather than producing harmony, such interpretations frequently result in discrimination, double burden, multiple forms of domestic violence, and marital dissolution. This condition underscores the urgency of reassessing the concept of marital obedience in light of contemporary social realities in which both husbands and wives participate in paid work and public life. Focusing on divorced working women, this descriptive qualitative study draws on in-depth interviews with eight female participants who experienced marital breakdown following prolonged structural inequality. The data were analyzed using Social Exchange Theory to examine the balance between costs and rewards within marital relationships. The findings demonstrate that marital instability emerges when wives continuously bear domestic, emotional, and economic responsibilities without reciprocal recognition, support, or shared accountability from their spouses. In such conditions, obedience is transformed from an ethical value into a mechanism of domination that legitimizes unequal power relations. This study argues that marital harmony cannot be sustained through unilateral obedience or rigid gender stereotypes, but instead requires reciprocal exchange, deliberation (<em>musyāwarah</em>), and cooperation between spouses across all domains of family life. These findings support the need to reinterpret marital obligations within Islamic family law and state marriage regulations toward a reciprocity-based framework that explicitly recognizes shared economic responsibility and protects working wives from structural discrimination.</p> <p> </p> Jumni Nelli Ahmad Zikri Devi Megawati Izzah Nur Aida Rahman Alwi Muhammad Hafis Copyright (c) 2026 Jumni Nelli, Ahmad Zikri, Devi Megawati, Izzah Nur Aida, Rahman Alwi, Muhammad Hafis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 2026-02-09 2026-02-09 25 1 1 14 10.31958/juris.v25i1.16025 https://ejournal.uinmybatusangkar.ac.id/ojs/index.php/Juris/article/view/15856 <div><span lang="EN-US">Mediation has gain traction as a tool of non-adversarial dispute resolution; it is more cost-efficient, time-saving, and feasible to extend access to justice. However tech-based mediation causes a more complex issues surrounding legal and ethical matters, particularly when applied to legal system based on normative and religious values, like sharia economy. This study aims to contribute theoretical and normative insights to electronic mediation (e-mediation) as a legal innovation for dispute resolution in sharia economy in the discourse of global law. This doctrinal law investigation used three approaches: legal approach, conceptual approach, and normative-comparative approach. The primary materials were laws and regulations and official documents concerning e-mediation and e-court, and data analysis was conducted with qualitative-normative legal analysis. The result showed that the transformation of conventional mediation to electronic mediation through the Supreme Court Regulation Number 3 of 2022 was a judiciary response to the challenges brough by digital disruption and the escalating sharia economy cases. Electronic mediation has expanded access to justice and offered efficient dispute resolution, particularly one involving business player and institutions. From the perspective of Islamic law, electronic mediation is legitimized by the principles of </span><em><span lang="EN-US">maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah</span></em><span lang="EN-US">, especially justice (</span><em><span lang="EN-US">ʿ</span><span lang="EN-US">adālah</span></em><span lang="EN-US">), protection of property (</span><em><span lang="EN-US">ḥ</span><span lang="EN-US">if</span><span lang="EN-US">ẓ</span><span lang="EN-US"> al-māl</span></em><span lang="EN-US">), volunteerism, peace, and public interests (</span><em><span lang="EN-US">maṣla</span><span lang="EN-US">ḥ</span><span lang="EN-US">ah</span></em><span lang="EN-US">), creating a normative and substantial alignment</span><span lang="IN">.</span></div> Moh. Hamzah Erie Hariyanto Moh Zahid Rudy Haryanto Masrufah Masrufah Copyright (c) 2026 Moh. Hamzah, Erie Hariyanto, Moh Zahid, Rudy Haryanto, Masrufah https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 2026-02-10 2026-02-10 25 1 15 27 10.31958/juris.v25i1.15856