WAKAF HAK CIPTA (Studi Komparasi Hukum Positif dan Hukum Islam)
Abstract
Waqf is one of the recommended forms of philanthropy (mandub) in Islam, because the reward of waqf will always flow even though wakif has died. In the modern era, waqf is no longer interpreted by giving immovable property such as land andbuildings, but movable property can be used as a waqf object. One of the objects of immovable property is intellectual property rights, namely: copyright. With the existence of waqf of copyright no longer obligate for the giver of waqf to have immovable property as treasure to be represented but other object which have economic value and social also can be waqfproperty.
References
Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Cascun, A. (2003). A Classroom Research. On Oral Error Correction. Abant Izzet Baysel University.
Choi, S.Y. and Li, S. (2012). Corrective Feedback and learner uptakein a child ESOL classroom. ESOL Classroom., 4(43,331-351).
Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective Feedback and Teacher Development. L2. Dulib Journal, 2(3-16.).
Heaton, J. (1990). Writing English Language Test:A Practical Guide for Teachers of English as A Second or Foreign Language. London: Longman Group.
Heift, G. (2002). When is Corrective Feedback most likely to succeed? International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciencenternational Journal of Educational Research.
Horwitz, E. (2008). Learner’s Perceptions of How Anxiety Interacts with Personal and Instructional Factors to Influence their Achievement in English: A Qualitative Analysis of EFL Learners in China. Language Learning Journal, 58(1), 1(58(1), 151–183).
Hyang-Sook Park. (2010). Teachers’ and Learners’ Preferences for Error Correction. The University of Texas Austin.
James, C. (1998). Errors in Language Learning and Use: Exploring Error Analysis. NewYork: Longman.
Katayama, A. (2007). Learners’ Perception Toward Oral Error Correction. University of Texas Austin.
Lyster, R & Panova, L. (2002). Pattern of Corrective Feedback and Uptake in an Adult ESL Classroom. TESOL Quarterly Journal , 36(36,573-595).
Lyster, R. (1997). Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake, Studies in Second Language Acquisition,. Language Teaching Research, 3(20 (3)).
Mackey, A. (2012). Input, Interaction, and Corrective Feedback in L2 Learning. (Oxford Uni).
Maolida, H, E. (2014). A descriptive Study of Teacher’s Oral Feedback in an ESL Young Learner Classroom in Indonesia. Kata Journal, 2.
Miles,M.B.&Huberman, M. A. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.
Nunan, D. (2004). Practical English Language Teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Oxford, A. (2000). LongmanDictionary of Contemporary. . London: Longman.
Oxford, R. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. New York: New York.
Pavlu, L. L. (2007). Technique in Mistakes Correction. Masyaryx University BRNO.
Pyne, C. (2012). In the Classroom Cataway? English Teaching Profesional Journal, (Issue 80.).
Rahmi, S. (2017). Types of Corrective Feedback Used by Four Lecturers on Students’ Speaking Performance. Innovis Journal, 2(2).
Richard, J. C. L. (1996). Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Riza, A. (2007). Lecturers Techniques in Giving Corrective Feedback in Classroom A Case Study of Graduate Lecturer’s Practice. State University of Padang.
Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake in Communicative Classroom Across Instructional Setting. Language Teaching Research, 8(3).
Smith, H. (2010). Correct Me If I am Wrong : Investigates the Preferences in Error Correction among Adult English learner. University of Central Florida. Retrieved from https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/4379.
Swain, M. (1993). Problems in Output and the Cognitive Processes they Generate: A Step towards Second Language Learning. Applied Linguistics, 16.
Ting, D. (2001). The Comparative Effectiveness of Recast and Prompts in Second Language Classroom. Journal of Cambridge Studies, 7(2).
Yoshida, R. (2008). Teachers Choice and Learners’ Preferences of Corrective Feedback Types. Language Awareness.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
