SUPERVISION OF ISLAMIC BANKING BASED ON LAW NUMBER 21 OF 2011
Keywords:
Islamic Bank, Supervision, Financial Services AuthorityAbstract
Islamic banks are banks that carry out their business activities based on the principles of Islamic law in muamalah activities based on fatwas issued by the National Sharia Council of the Council of Indonesian Religious Leader. The rapid development of Islamic banking in the national banking system is inseparable from the trust given by the Indonesian people who are predominantly Muslim. To maintain public trust, Islamic banks must be monitored, both the operational system and its compliance with sharia principles and applicable laws and regulations. The problem discussed in this research is how is supervision of Islamic banking based on Law Number 21 of 2011? The method used in this research is normative legal research using the regulatory approach. Based on Law Number 21 of 2011, the Financial Services Authority has the authority to supervise Islamic banks including Islamic bank institutions, Islamic bank health, prudential aspects of Islamic banks, and Islamic bank checks.References
Amir, M. S. (2011). Adat minangkabau; pola dan tujuan hidup orang Minang. Jakarta: Citra Harta Prima.
Baker, P., & Sibonile, E. (2011). Key terms in discourse analysis. New York: Continuum. New York: Continuum.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Mediapsychology, 3, 265–299. doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03.
Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context.Applied Psychology: an International Review, 51(2), 269–290.
Bondareva, T.O., Khan, N.N., Pristupa, E.N., Dossanova, A.Z., Kremneva, T.L & and Rakymzhan Turysbek, R. (2017). The social and pedagogical characteristics of a future. teacher’s readiness for developing the intellectual and creativepotential of a junior schoolchild in the heterogeneous ethnicenvironment. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 25 (S): 195 - 210 .
Clare, S., Krogman, N., & Caine, K. J. (2013). Geoforum The ‘“ balance discourse ”’: A case study of power and wetland management, 49, 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.05.007
Cole , D. R., & Graham, L. J. (2012). The power in/of language. Chichester: Blackwell.
Fairclough, N. (2006). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Fies, C., & Langman, J. (2011). Bridging worlds-measuring learners’ discursive practice in a partsim supported biology lesson. International Journal of Science and Mathematic Education, Vol. 9 (6) 1415-1438. doi: 10.1007/s10763-010-9271-y
Fixsen, A., & Ridge, D. (2012). Performance, emotion work, and transition: challenging experiences of complementary therapy student practitioners commencing clinical practice. Qualitative Health Research, 22(9) 1163–1175. doi: 10.1177/1049732312449213
Gasparov, B. (2010). Speech, memory, and meaning intertextuality in everyday language. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Gee, J. P. (2001). Introduction to discourse analysis; theory and method. london: Routledge.
Giere, S. D. (2010). Giere, S.D. (2009). A new glimpse of day one intertextuality, history of interpretation, and genesis. Walter de Gruyter. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.
Graham , J., & Dornan, D. (2013). Power in clinical teachers’ discourses of a curriculum-inaction-Critical discourse analysis. Adv in Health Sci Educ, 18975–985. doi:10.1007/s10459-012-9437-1
Ha, T.S and Tam, C.L. 2013. Relationships of birth order, parent-child relationship, personality, and academic performance. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum.21 (1) 17-52 .
Harman, R. (2013). Literary intertextuality in genre-based pedagogies: Building lexical cohesion in fifth-grade L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol. 22 (2)125-140. doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.006
Hassan, A., &Al-Jubari, I. Motivation and study engagement: a study of muslim undergraduates in Malaysia. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 24 (3): 937-951 (2016).
Hudson, R. A. (1985). Sociolinguistics. New York: Cambridge Universsity Press.
Hussein, J. Q., & Abdullah, I. H. (2016). The role of cognitive context in the interpretation of riddles: A relevance theory perspective. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 24(February), 11–20.
Jarvela, S., Malmberg, J., & Isoh, J. I. (2016). How do types of interaction and phases of self-regulated learning set a stage for collaborative engagement? Learning and Instruction XXX 1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.005
Jorgensen, M., & Phillips, L. (2002). Discouse analysis; as theory and method.London: Sage.
Karpudewan, M., & Meng, C. K. (2017). The Effects of Classroom Learning Environment and Laboratory Learning Environment on the Attitude towards Learning Science in the 21st Century Science Lessons. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 272.
Khalidah K. A., Rohani, S.,& Mashitah, S. (2014) Ethical values and commitment towards achieving excellence: a study on public boarding school students in Malaysia. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 22 (S): 33 - 50.
Krapp, K. (2005). Psychologists and their theories for students. New York: Thomson Gale.
Learner-Centered Work Group of the American Psychological Association’s Board of Education Affairs. Leraner-centered psychological principles. A frame work for scholl reform. November, 1997. http://www.cdl.org/articles/learner-centered-psychological-principles/
Maeda, M. (2008). Power relations among actors in development cooperation: patterns, concepts and approaches in a Japanese-assisted teacher training project in Canada. International Journal of Educational Development. Vol. 28 (5). doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2007.05.005.
Masuda, K., Arnett, C.,&Labarca, A. (2015). Cognitive linguistics and sociocultural theory (applications for second and foreign language teaching). 3. A cognitive linguistic approach to teaching Chinese spatial particles: From contrastive constructional analysis to material design. Walter de Gruyter: Volume:10.1515/9781614514442.
Mayring, P. (2014). Quantitative content analysis. theoritical foundation: basic procedures and software solution. Retrieved 4/ 4, 2016, from http://nbn-resulving.de/
Mizokawa, A. (2014). Theory of mind and sensitivity to teacher and peer critiscm among Japanese children. Infant and Child Development. Vol. 4 (3). 10.1002/icd.1877
Myers, S. A. (2017a). A longitudinal analysis of students’ motives for communicating with their instructors. Communication Education, 66(4), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2017.1313437
Myers, S. A. (2017b). The instructor-student relationship as an alternative form of superior-subordinate relationship. Communication Education, 66(1), 110–112. https://doi.org/03634523.2016.1221513
Myers, S. A., & Claus, C. J. (2012). The Relationship Between Students’ Motives to Communicate With Their Instructors and Classroom Environment. Communication Quarterly, 60(3), 386–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2012.688672
Myrahil. (2013, March 2). Mengintip Rahasia Sukses Orang Minang. Retrieved June 13, 2017, from Myrahil.wordpress. com: https:// myrahil. wordpress.com/ 2013/03/02/mengintip-rahasia-sukses-orang-minang/
Nasroen, M. (1957). Dasar falsafah Minagkabau. Jakarta: Penerbit Pasaman.
Nassaji, H. (2007). Schema theory and knowledge-basedprocesses in second language readingcomprehension: a need for alternativeperspectives. Language Learning, Vol. 57 (1) 79-133. doi: 10.1111/2Fj.1467-9922.2007.00413.x.
Navis, A. A. (1984).Alam takambang jadi guru. Jakarta: Grafiti Pers.
Nevins, M. E. (2010). Nevins, M.Eleanor. 2010. “Intertexuality and misunderstanding. language and communication, Vol. 30 1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.langcom.2009.10.001
Perumal, J. (2008). Student resistance and teacher authority: the demands and dynamics of collaborative learning. Journal of Curriculum Studies, Vol. 40 No 3 381-398. doi: 10.1080/00220270701724570?.
Pol, J. V., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2011). Pattern of contingent teaching in teacher-student interaction. learning and instruction, 21 46-57. doi:10.1016/j. learninstruc. 2009.10.004
Rogers, R. (2011). An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education. New York: Routledge. New York: Routledge.
Ruiz, J. R. (Volume 10.No.2 Art.26.May 2009, May 26). Sosiological discourse analysis: methods and logic.” forum qualitative social research. . Retrieved December 25, 2014, from http.www.qualitative.
Rymes, B. (2008). Classrom discourse analysis: a tool for critical reflection. New Jesey: Hampton.
Shalihin, N. (2014). Demokrasi di nagarinya para tuan. Lubuk Lintah: Imam Bonjol Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Williams, W. M. (2010). Educational Psychology (2nd ed.). Upper SaddleRiver, New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Strauman , T. J., & Wilson, W. A. (2010). Individual differences in approach and avoidance; behavioral activation/inhibition and regulatory focus as distinct levels of analysis. In R. H. (ed), Handbook of personality and self-regulation (p. 447). Blackwell Publishing.
Swain, M., Sharon L., Ibtissen K., Wataru S & Lindsay B. 2009. Languaging:University students learning the grammatical concept of voice in French. TheModern Language Journal 93 (1). 5–29.
Syuhendri. (2012, February 14). Adat basandi syarak, syarak basandi kitabullah. Retrieved June 13, 2017, from Minangkbau: https://minangkabauku.wordpress.com/2012/02/14/ kato-dahulu-kato-batapati/
Tan, S. K., Armum, P., Chokkalingam, A. I., Meerah, T. S. M., Halim, L., Osman, K. and Chellappan, K. Communication: uses and influence of employment among youths: the role of formal education.Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 25 (S): 21 - 34 (2017).
Van-Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Varelas, M., Pappas, C. C., & Rife, R. (2006). Exploring the role of intertextuality in concept construction: urban second graders make sense of evaporation, boiling, and condensation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , Vol. 43, No. 7. 637–666 . 10.1002/tea.20100
Vollmeyer, R., & Rheinberg. , F. (2006). Motivational effects on self-regulated learning with different tasks. Educ Psychol Rev, 239–253.10.1007/s10648-006-9017-0
Warren, M. (2013). ‘‘Just spoke to . . .’’: The types and directionality of intertextuality in professional discourse. Martin Warren. The types and directionality of intertextuality in English for Specific Purposes, Vol 32 (1) 1-24. doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2012.07.001.
Weibell, C. J. Principles of learning: A conceptual framework for domain-specific theories of learning. . Retrieved June 14, 2017, from Principles of learning:[https://principlesoflearning.wordpress.com].
Wooffitt, R. (2005). Conversation analysis and discourse analysis; a comparative and critical introduction. London: Sage.
Yasnitsky, A. (2007). Vygotsky circle as a personal network of scholars:restoring connections between people and ideas. Integr Psych Behav (2011) 45:422–457 . Doi: 10.1007/s12124-011-9168-5.
Yelfiza. (2016, February 5). Ideology and power of the lecturers' classroom discouse in communiating learning tasks at university level. unpublished Dissertation.UNP (State University of Padang): Padang, Sumatera Barat, Indonesia.
Yelfiza., Yulmiati., & Sukandi, S.S. (2016). English lecturers’ thematic intertextuality in communicating learning tasks to Minangkabaunese students.5 ICLLCE 2016 (pp. 64-77). Singapore: icsai.org.
Zhang, Z., & Verhaeghen, P. (2009). Glimpses of a one-speed mind: Focus-switching and search for verbal and visual, and easy and difficult items in working memory. Acta Psychologica , Vol. 131 235-244.Doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.05.009.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
