BUBBLES WRITING: CREATIVE TEACHING MODELS FOR JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS

Authors

  • Sahyoni Sahyoni English Department, State College for Islamic Studies (STAIN) Mandailing Natal

Abstract

This paper aims at discussing creative writing model for junior high school students. The idea of creative instructional model for teaching is a special gift for the students. As an English teacher, being creative is a must and no bargaining especially for this millennial era. Teaching writing for junior high school students is a kind of challenging for novelty even senior English teachers. Communicative language teaching facilitates teachers to explore more studentsÔÇÖ creativity. The ways of presenting writing materials also has been shifted massively, teachers center left out by new teachers and students center applied step by step regularly by them. Creative writing is definitely one of those areas in which teachers struggle. There is plenty of dull and old teaching strategy out there and students get cross-eyed with a heap of frustration and unmotivated. Bubbles writing is assumed creative writing model for teaching writing in junior high school students level. There are three advantages why this model is prominent than others for junior high school students they are: students-centered, fun and enjoyable, and innovative. This model has myriad advantages for students; students learn to sharpen cognitive thinking, to express their idea freely, to facilitate students being more active, to enjoy their writing activity.

Author Biography

Sahyoni Sahyoni, English Department, State College for Islamic Studies (STAIN) Mandailing Natal


References

Aditia, M. T., & Muspiroh, N. (2013). Pengembangan modul pembelajaran berbasis Sains, Lingkungan, Teknologi, Masyarakat dan Islam (SALINGTEMASIS) dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa pada konsep ekosistem kelas X di SMA NU (Nadhatul Ulama) Lemahabang Kabupaten Cirebon. Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 2(2), 127-148.

Alawiyah, F. (2014). Pendidikan madrasah di Indonesia. Jurnal Aspirasi, 5(1), 51-58

Anjarsari, P. (2014). Literasi sains dalam kurikulum dan pembelajaran IPA SMP. Prosiding Semnas Pensa VI ”Peran Literasi Sains” (hlm. 602-607). Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Anwar, M. S., Choirudin, C., Ningsih, E. F., Dewi, T., & Maseleno, A. (2019). Developing an interactive mathematics multimedia learning based on Ispring presenter in increasing students’ interest in learning mathematics. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 135-150.

Awwaliyah, R., & Baharun, H. (2019). Pendidikan Islam dalam sistem pendidikan nasional (telaah epistemologi terhadap problematika pendidikan Islam). Jurnal Ilmiah Didaktika: Media Ilmiah Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 19(1), 34-49.

Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students' learning: A preliminary meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, 12(5), 23-37.

Buchori, A. (2019). Pengembangan multimedia interaktif dengan pendekatan kontekstual untuk meningkatkan pemecahan masalah kemampuan matematika. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 6(1), 104-115.

Budiman, H. (2017). Peran teknologi informasi dan komunikasi dalam pendidikan. Al-Tadzkiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(1), 31-43.

Creswel, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los angeles: University of Nebraska–Lincoln.

Danim, S., & Darwis. (2003). Metode penelitian (Prosedur, kebijakan dan etik). Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kedokteran EGC.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publication, Inc.

Depdiknas. (2002). Pendekatan kontekstual (contextual teaching and learning). Jakarta: Direktorat Pendidikan Lanjutan Pertama.

Dix, K. (1999). Enhanced mathematics learning: Does technology make a difference. Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, 2, 192-199.

Ehrmann, S. C. (1994). Responding to the triple challenge facing post secondary education: Access, quality, costs. In Report prepared for the OECD, International conference, December 14-16, Paris (pp. 14-16).

Galligan, L., Loch, B., McDonald, C., & Taylor, J. A. (2010). The use of Tablet and related technologies in mathematics teaching. Australian Senior Mathematics Journal, 24(1), 38-51.

Hapiz, A., Afifuddin, M., Annisa, H., Abdussakir, & Rofiki, I. (2019). Bilangan pecahan dalam al-Quran dan Hadits. Prosiding Sendika (Vol. 5, No. 1, hlm. 72-80). Purworejo: Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo.

Hariyani, M. (2013). Strategi pembelajaran matematika Madrasah Ibtidaiyah berintegrasi nilai-nilai Islam. MENARA, 12(2), 150-155.

Huberman, M., & Miles, M. B. (2002). The qualitative researcher's companion. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publication, Inc.

Indirani, F. (2016). Kompetensi pedagogik mahasiswa dalam mengelola pembelajaran tematik integratif Kurikulum 2013 pada pengajaran micro di PGSD UAD Yogyakarta. Profesi Pendidikan Dasar, 2(2), 87-94.

Kholidah, L. N. (2015). Pola integrasi nilai-nilai keislaman dalam pembelajaran pendidikan agama Islam pada lembaga pendidikan. At-Ta'dib, 10(2), 325-340.

Kurniati, A. (2015). Mengenalkan matematika terintegrasi Islam kepada anak sejak dini. Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(1), 1-8.

Maarif, S. (2015). Integrasi matematika dan Islam dalam pembelajaran matematika. Infinity Journal, 4(2), 223-236.

Moksin, A. I., Shahrill, M., Anshari, M., Huda, M., & Tengah, K. A. (2018). The learning of integration in calculus using the autograph technology. Advanced Science Letters, 24(1), 550-552.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Nu'man, A. Z. (2014). Efektifitas penerapan e-learning Model Edmodo dalam pembelajaran pendidikan agama Islam terhadap hasil belajar siswa (Studi kasus: SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Sukoharjo). DutaCom Journal, 7(1), 1-13.

Qomar, M. (2007). Manajemen pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Raharjo. (2009). Madrasah sebagai centre of excellent. Makalah Seminar IAIN Wali Songo Semarang. Semarang: IAIN Wali Songo.

Rahmawati, A., & Rizki, S. (2017). Pengembangan bahan ajar matematika berbasis nilai-nilai Islam pada materi aritmatika sosial. Jurnal Aksioma Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Univ. Muhammadiyah Metro, 6(1), 81-88.

Salim, A. (2019). Manajemen pendidikan karakter di Madrasah. Tarbawi: Jurnal Keilmuan Manajemen Pendidikan, 1(2), 1-16.

Sanyal, B. C. (2001). New functions of higher education and ICT to achieve education for all. Paper prepared for the Expert Roundtable on Universiw and Technology-for- LiteraCyBwic Education Partnership in Developing Countries. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning, UNESCO.

Sudijono, A. (2013). Pengantar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Supriadi, N. (2015). Mengembangkan kemampuan koneksi matematis melalui Buku Ajar Elektronik Interaktif (BAEI) yang terintegrasi nilai-nilai keislaman. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 63-74.

Watkins, D. C. (2012). Qualitative research: The importance of conducting research that doesn’t “count”. Health promotion practice, 13(2), 153-158.

Wiest, L. R. (2001). The role of computers in mathematics teaching and learning. Computers in the Schools, 17(1-2), 41-55.

Yen, T. S., & Halili, S. H. (2015). Effective teaching of higher order thinking (HOT) in education. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 3(2), 41-47.

Yusnita, I., Masykur, R., & Suherman, S. (2016). Modifikasi model pembelajaran Gerlach dan Ely melalui integrasi nilai-nilai keislaman sebagai upaya meningkatkan kemampuan representasi matematis. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 29-38.

Zainuddin, M. (2011). Paradigma pendidikan Islam holistik. Ulumuna, 15(1), 73-94.

Downloads

Published

2020-05-29