FENOMENA NIKAH SIRRI DI LUBUK IPUH, NAGARI KURAI TAJI PARIAMAN

Authors

  • Ashabul Fadhli Dosen Universitas Putra Indonesia ÔÇ£YTPKÔÇØ Padang.
  • Fathurrahmi Fathurrahmi Dosen Universitas Putra Indonesia ÔÇ£YTPKÔÇØ Padang.

Abstract

One form of marriage that is not justified in view of Islamic law is a marriage that is conducted secretly (sir) or in this case called by Sirri marriage. The marriage is not considered perfect, when it has not been published and equipped with the testament. The marriage that has been overshadowed by the elements or attempt to conceal, classified in prohibited marriage. In order not to fall into this category, then the solution is to announce. The goal is clear, in order to realize an ideal household life and have the force of law. But a legal guarantee by the state through the legal framework above was not implemented in Nagari Kurai Taji Pariaman, West Sumatra. The findings of the authors discovered that the groom and bride were married Sirri by the religious leaders (Ungku) from local society; not by Qadhi as the authorities designated by law. Through field research, data gathered from Ungku and some people in Nagari Kurai Taji Pariaman, were analyzed using qualitative descriptive using a normative-juridical-socio approach.

References

Acheson, Keith A and Gall, Meredith Damien, 1887.Techniques in The Clinical Supervision of Teachers, London: Longman,

Arikunto, Suharsimi, Prosedur Penelitian, Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 1991.

Ansyar, Mohammad. 1981. A Study of Teacher and Students Perceptions of Exixting and Recommended Curriculum Goal and Practice in West Sumatra, Indiana: Indiana University,

Corsin, R.J. 1987. Concise Encyclopedia of Psychology, New York: John Wiley and Son.

Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 1983. Supervisi Klinis, Jakarta: Ditjen Pendidikan Tinggi.

Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 1982. Dasar-dasar Ilmu Pendidikan, Jakarta: Ditjen Pendidikan Tinggi.

Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 1983. Alat Penilaian Kemampuan Guru, Jakarta: Ditjen Perguruan Tinggi.

Dobson, Julia, 1990. A TEAFL Anthology, Selected Articles from The English Forum, Washington: International Agency.

Echol, John M and Shadly, Hassan, 2010. Kamus Inggris Indonesia, Jakarta: Gramedia.

Hasby, Abdullah, Teknik Evalusi, Banda Aceh: Fakultas Tarbiyah IAIN Arraniry, 1985.

Hersey, Paul and Blanchard, Kenneth H. 1988. Management of Organizational Behavior, Utilizing Human Resources, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Huston, John P. 1985. Motivation, New York: Mc Millan Publishing Company.

Imron, Ali, 1995. Pembinaan Guru di Indonesia, Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.

Indrawijaya, Adam I. 1986. Perilaku Organisasi, Bandung: Sinar Baru.

Intan, Nur, Persepsi Siswa SMA Negeri 2 Plus Mata Uli Sibolga terhadap Efektivitas Proses Belajar Mengajar (Skripsi), Padangsidimpuan: STAIN Padangsidimpuan, 2002.

Licio, William H and Mc Neil, John D. Mc. 1999. Supervision in Though and Action, New York: Mc Graw Hill Company.

Merril, David M, Compnent. 1993. Display Theory, Los Angeles: University of Southern California.

Nazir, Moh. 2000. Metode Penelitian, Jakarta: Ghalia.

Riyanto, Yatim, 1996. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan, Suatu Tinjauan Dasar, Surabaya: SIC.

Pidarta, Made. 1992. Pemikiran Tentang supervisi Pendidikan, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Purwanto, Ngalim. 1996. Prinsip-prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran, Bandung: Remaja Karya.

Robinson, John J. 1978. ERIC Clearing house on Education, (The Observation Report – A Help or Nuisance), November,

Subari, 1994. Supervisi Pendidikan, Dalam Rangka Perbaikan Situasi Mengajar, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Sujana, Nana. 2000. Dasar-dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar, Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.

Tuckman, Bruce W. 1978. Conducting Educational Research, Toronto: Harcourt Bruce Jovanovic Publishers.

Wiles, Kimbal, 1955. Supervision for Better School, New York: Prentice Hall.

Published

2017-05-17