IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF ACCOUNTING TEACHING LEARNING PROCESS THROUGH LESSON STUDY
Abstract
Lesson Studythat was implemented in Economy Ecounting Department is one of the ways to enhanche the quality of the accounting teaching learning process collaboratively and sustainably. The aims of this research is to know the improvement of the accounting teaching learning process through the implementation of 4 cycles Lesson Study. This descriptive qualitative research used observation, questionnaire and interviewas research instruments in which the plan, do, see methods were implemented in each cycles.The data collected from observation such as: 1) studentsÔÇÖ interaction during the teaching learning process that consists of ; a) students-students interaction b) studentsÔÇÖ interaction with the teaching media, and ┬ác) studentsÔÇÖ interaction with the lecturer model. 2) exploration toward the studentsÔÇÖ understanding during the teaching learning process. 3) whether or not the students are able to learn well 4) the significances that can be gained from the teaching learning process, both for the lecturer model, observer, and students. The results of the research showed that the mean score of the implementation of the lesson study in the first cycle was 2.83 (good enough) , second cycleÔÇÖs score was 3.33 (good) and the third cycleÔÇÖs score was 3.80 (good) and there was improvement in the last cycleÔÇÖs mean score that was 4,10 (good). So it can be concluded that there is improvement on the quality of the accounting teaching learning process in each cycles.
References
Bem, SL. (1974). “The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny”. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. [47]:155-162.
Broverman, I.K. at al. (1982). “Sex-role Stereotypes”. Journal of Social Issues. [28].
Chodorow, N. (1974). “Family Structure and Feminine Personality”. Women, Culture and Society. MZ.Rosaldo & L.Lamphere (eds). Stanford Ca: Stanford University Press.
Dornbusch, S.M. (1976). The Development of Sex Differences. EE. Maccoby (ed). Stanford Ca: Stanford University Press.
Friedman, HS & Schustack, MW. Personality: Classic Theories and Modern Research. 3rd Edition. (California: Allyn & Bacon, 2006),
Hurlock, E.B. (1982). Developmental Psychology: A Lifespan Approach. 4th Edition. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company.
Kaplan, AG. (1979). “Clarifying the Concept of Androgyny: Implication for Therapy”. Psychology of Women Quarterly. [3]: 231-240.
Lerner & Hultsch. (1983). “Research on Sex Differences in Cognitive, Personality, and Social Development”. Human Development: A life-Span Perspective. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company.
Maccoby, E & Jacklin, CN. (1974). The Psychology of Sex Differences. Stanford Ca: Stanford University Press.
Milller, J.B. (1976). Toward a New Psychology of Women. New York: Beacon Press.
Rubin, K.H. (et al). (1983). “Development of Spatial Egocentrism and Conservation Across the Lifespan”. Developmental Psychology. [9]:432.
Spence, J.T & Helmrich, R.I. (1978). Masculinity and Feminity. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
