ANALISIS PENETAPAN PENGADILAN TERHADAP PERMOHONAN IZIN PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA
Abstract
Interfaith marriage is a growing social problem in Indonesia. As a country that believes in God Almighty, marriage in Indonesia is regulated in Law Number 1 of 1974 which does not recognize the validity of interfaith marriages. However, with the existence of Law Number 23 of 2006 it is possible for interfaith marriages to be registered with the court if the marriage gets permission from the court. By using the normative juridical method, the author analyzes the legal considerations of the Pati District Court judges in cases of Applications for Interfaith Marriage Permits. From the author's analysis, it was found that juridically, the judge had revealed legal provisions that did not recognize the validity of interfaith marriages. However, philosophically, the judge did not consider the impact that would be experienced by interfaith marriages. In providing legal certainty, Law no. 23/2006 which is used as a legal consideration does not explain the validity of marriage as part of a religious ritual. The consideration of the usefulness of the judge's decision in this case is limited to carrying out trial proceedings by ignoring religious considerations from religious institutions that have the potential to weaken the community's religious observanceReferences
Amri, A. (2020). Perkawinan Beda Agama Menurut Hukum Positif dan Hukum Islam. Media Syari’ah, 22(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.22373/jms.v22i1.6719
Arto, A. M. (1996). Praktek Perkara Perdata pada Pengadilan Agama. Pustaka Pelajar.
Fanani, D. H. A. Z. (2017). Aspek Filsafat dalam Pertimbangan Putusan Pengadilan. Majalah Hukum Varia Peradilan, 380.
Jalil, A. (2018). Pernikahan Beda Agama dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif di Indonesia. Andragogi: Jurnal Diklat Teknis Pendidikan Dan Keagamaan, 6(2), 46–69. https://doi.org/10.36052/andragogi.v6i2.56
jpnn.com. (2022). Sebegini Jumlah Pasangan Melakukan Pernikahan Beda Agama di Indonesia, Jangan Kaget ya.
Kaharuddin, K., & Syafruddin, S. (2020). Pernikahan Beda Agama Dan Dampak Terhadap Pendidikan Agama Anak. SANGAJI: Jurnal Pemikiran Syariah Dan Hukum, 4(1), 53–81. https://doi.org/10.52266/sangaji.v4i1.479
Katry, O. P. (2018). Pernikahan Beda Agama Dalam Masyarakat Kota Palu (Analisis Sosiologis).
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Nomor 68/PUU-XII/2014 1 (2014).
M.Yunus, F., & Aini, Z. (2020). Perkawinan Beda Agama Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2006 Tentang Administrasi Kependudukan (Tinjauan Hukum Islam). Media Syari’ah, 20(2), 138. https://doi.org/10.22373/jms.v20i2.6512
Mahmudah, N. (2019). Aspek Sosiologis Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Pada Perkara Cerai Gugat. Nizham, 7(1).
Mertokusumo, S. (2009). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Liberty.
Rifai, A. (2010). Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif. Sinar Grafika.
Sugeng, Bambang, S. (2011). Hukum Acara Perdata dan Dokumen Litigasi Perkara Perdata. Kencana.
Sutiyoso, B. (2006). Metode Penemuan Hukum Upaya Mewujudkan Hukum yang Pasti dan Berkeadilan. UIIS Press.
Tobroni, F. (2016). Kebebasan Hak Ijtihad Nikah Beda Agama Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 12(3), 604. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1239
Wardana, M. R. (2020). Kedudukan Perkawinan Beda Agama Dan Perkawinan Campuran Di Indonesia. Al-Banjari : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 19(1), 84. https://doi.org/10.18592/al-banjari.v19i1.3821
Arto, A. M. (1996). Praktek Perkara Perdata pada Pengadilan Agama. Pustaka Pelajar.
Fanani, D. H. A. Z. (2017). Aspek Filsafat dalam Pertimbangan Putusan Pengadilan. Majalah Hukum Varia Peradilan, 380.
Jalil, A. (2018). Pernikahan Beda Agama dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif di Indonesia. Andragogi: Jurnal Diklat Teknis Pendidikan Dan Keagamaan, 6(2), 46–69. https://doi.org/10.36052/andragogi.v6i2.56
jpnn.com. (2022). Sebegini Jumlah Pasangan Melakukan Pernikahan Beda Agama di Indonesia, Jangan Kaget ya.
Kaharuddin, K., & Syafruddin, S. (2020). Pernikahan Beda Agama Dan Dampak Terhadap Pendidikan Agama Anak. SANGAJI: Jurnal Pemikiran Syariah Dan Hukum, 4(1), 53–81. https://doi.org/10.52266/sangaji.v4i1.479
Katry, O. P. (2018). Pernikahan Beda Agama Dalam Masyarakat Kota Palu (Analisis Sosiologis).
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Nomor 68/PUU-XII/2014 1 (2014).
M.Yunus, F., & Aini, Z. (2020). Perkawinan Beda Agama Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2006 Tentang Administrasi Kependudukan (Tinjauan Hukum Islam). Media Syari’ah, 20(2), 138. https://doi.org/10.22373/jms.v20i2.6512
Mahmudah, N. (2019). Aspek Sosiologis Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Pada Perkara Cerai Gugat. Nizham, 7(1).
Mertokusumo, S. (2009). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Liberty.
Rifai, A. (2010). Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif. Sinar Grafika.
Sugeng, Bambang, S. (2011). Hukum Acara Perdata dan Dokumen Litigasi Perkara Perdata. Kencana.
Sutiyoso, B. (2006). Metode Penemuan Hukum Upaya Mewujudkan Hukum yang Pasti dan Berkeadilan. UIIS Press.
Tobroni, F. (2016). Kebebasan Hak Ijtihad Nikah Beda Agama Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 12(3), 604. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1239
Wardana, M. R. (2020). Kedudukan Perkawinan Beda Agama Dan Perkawinan Campuran Di Indonesia. Al-Banjari : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 19(1), 84. https://doi.org/10.18592/al-banjari.v19i1.3821
Downloads
Published
2022-12-04
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
