ANALISIS DAMPAK PEMBANGUNAN KAMPUS II IAIN BATUSANGKAR TERHADAP EKONOMI MASYARAKAT DI NAGARI CUBADAK

Authors

  • Vicy Andriany Institut Agama Islam Negeri Batusangkar
  • Fredi Fransisko Institut Agama Islam Negeri Batusangkar

Abstract

The problem in this research is the construction of the IAIN Batusangkar II campus which is feared to reduce productive land so that it has an impact on people's livelihoods. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of the construction of Campus II IAIN Batusangkar on the economy of the community in Nagari Cubadak. The type of research used is field research with a qualitative descriptive approach. The data sources in this study were the Wali Nagari Cubadak and entrepreneurs in Nagari Cubadak. The results of the study found that there were new livelihoods for the community which in the end were expected to become additional income so that economic conditions could improve. The construction of Campus II IAIN Batusangkar has a positive impact on the surrounding community, with new business opportunities for the community around Campus II of IAIN Batusangkar. The local government needs to regulate development policies in Nagari Cubadak so that there is no chaos due to the uncontrolled pace of development and to protect productive agricultural lands in Nagari Cubadak so as not to be eroded by the pace of development. 

References

Agustiani, I. W. D. (2017). The correlation between Students reading Attitude and their reading comprehension achievement. English Community Journal, 1(2), 75-85.

Alexander, J. E., & Filler, R. C. (1976). Attitudes and Reading. Newark, Del: International Reading Association.

Araujo, L. (2014). Reading Literacy Achievement. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270817138

Avallone, N. R. (2005). The Impact of Student Attitudes About Reading on Reading Progress.

Callan, G. L., Marchant, G. J., Finch, W. H., & German, R. L. (2016). Metacognition, strategies, achievement, and demographics: Relationships across countries. Educational sciences: Theory & practice, 16(5).

Contractor, C. B. (2016). PISA 2018 Reading Literacy Framework.

Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. M. (2004). A beginner's guide to partial least squares analysis. Understanding statistics, 3(4), pp. 283-297

Kush, J. C., Watkins, M. W., & Brookhart, S. M. (2005). The temporal-interactive influence of reading achievement and reading attitude. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11(1), 29-44.

Lau, K. L., & Ho, E. S. C. (2016). Reading performance and self-regulated learning of Hong Kong students: What we learnt from PISA 2009. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(1), 159-171.

Lim, H. J., & Jung, H. (2019). Factors related to digital reading achievement: A multi-level analysis using international large-scale data. Computers & Education, 133, 82-93.

Ross, C. S. (2009). Reading Interests. In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences (pp. 4423-4432). CRC Press.

Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018: Insights and Interpretations. OECD Publishing.

Smith, J. K., Smith, L. F., Gilmore, A., & Jameson, M. (2012). Students' self-perception of reading ability, enjoyment of reading and reading achievement. Learning and individual differences, 22(2), 202-206.

Thomson, S., Hillman, K., & De Bortoli, L. (2013). A teacher's guide to PISA reading literacy.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-04