UTILIZATION OF FREEWARE FOR NEW APPROACH OF STUDENT CENTERED MULTIMEDIA LEARNING MODULE FOR SCIENCE SUBJECTS

Authors

  • Rosly Jaafar PhyKiR Group Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak

Abstract

In this article, the authors will discuss on the utilization of freeware from internet and easily accessible software for the development of new approach to student-centered learning module (SCLMM) for science subjects. Currently, there are many software which are able to contribute to the education field. However, those software or assistive technology software in the market are expensive and users have to pay for their licenses and are not easily accessible. Freeware is define as any software that can be found in the internet and require no license fee. Many of these freeware or applications can contribute to the education sector. In fact the SCLMM developed from freeware can enhance studentsÔÇÖ understanding on the scientific concept during their learning process. This encourages educators to develop their own SCLMM that allows active learning process for their students and also can be used for other method of teaching methodologies such as blended learning etc. This article further highlights some examples of freeware and possible practical implementation into SCLMM in a selected science topic. This new approach and with further effort on exploring the application of this freeware on other topics; we are hopeful that transforming science SCLMM in all levels of education into an entertaining and attractive learning activities will be achieved.

References

[1] Zhang, D., Zhao, J. L., Zhou, L., & Nunamaker Jr, J. F. (2004). Can elearning replace classroom learning?. Communications of the ACM, 47(5), 7579.
[2] Carlile, O., & Jordan, A. (2005). It works in practice but will it work in theory? The theoretical underpinnings of pedagogy. Emerging Issues in the Practice of University Learning and Teaching. Dublin: AISHE, 11-26.
[3] Woolfolk, A.E. (1998). Educational psychology (7th ed.) United State: Allyn & Bacon.
[4] Mager, R. F., & Peatt, N. (1962). Preparing instructional objectives (Vol. 962). Belmont, CA: Fearon Publishers.
[5] Gagné, R. M., & Medsker, K. (1996). The conditions of learning. New York: Harcourt Brace.
[6] Shuell, T. J. (1986). Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review of educational research, 56(4), 411-436.
[7] Anderson, J.R. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications (4th ed.), New York: Freeman.
[8] Bandura, D. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [9] Farnham-Diggory, S. (1994). Paradigms of knowledge and instruction. Review of Educational Research, 64, 463-477.
[10] Piaget, J. (19630. Origins of intelligence in children. New York: Norton.
[11] Carlile, O., Jordan, A., & Stack, A. (2004). Learning by Design: Learning Theory for the Designer of Multimedia Educational Materials. WIT/BBC Online: Waterford, Ireland.
[12] Buzan, T. (1996). Use your head, 1974. BBC Publication, London.
[13] Lunsford, A. (2003). Cognitive development and the basic writer. Crosstalk in comp theory: A reader, 299-310.
[14] Odell, L. (1973). Teaching reading: An alternative approach. English Journal, 454-488.
[15] Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. Vygotskian approaches to second language research, 33456.
[16] Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.
[17] Chang, S. L., & Ley, K. (2006). A learning strategy to compensate for cognitive overload in online learning: Learner use of printed online materials. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 5(1), 104-117.
[18] Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1992). The split‐ attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62(2), 233-246.
[19] Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A duel coding approach. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
[20] Koretsky, M. D., Amatore, D., Barnes, C., & Kimura, S. (2008). Enhancement of student learning in experimental design using a virtual laboratory. Education, IEEE Transactions on, 51(1), 76-85.
[21] Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education Next, 12(1), 82-83.

Downloads

Published

2018-02-13

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2017): PROCEEDING 2nd INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON EDUCATION FAKULTAS TARBIYAH DAN ILMU KEGURUAN INSTITUT AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI BATUSANGKAR. ISBN : 978-602-329-071-0

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.