PENGARUH TEMPERATUR ANNEALING TERHADAP SIFAT FISIS BATU BATA LIMBAH SERAT ALAMI

Authors

  • ARTHA NESA CHANDRA Jurusan Tadris Fisika Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan IAIN Batusangkar
  • Djusmaini Djamas Jurusan Fisika FMIPA Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Ramli Ramli Jurusan Fisika FMIPA Universitas Negeri Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31958/js.v8i2.476

Keywords:

bricks waste of natural fibers, annealing temperature, porosity, compressive strength

Abstract

This study aims to determine at what temperature annealing which will produce compressive strength and good porosity in the brick waste natural fiber. This study was an experimental study with dick variables such as the proportion of clay and waste of natural powder that is 90%: 10%, each grain size 0.18 mm material, waste natural powder used is sawdust sawmill. The independent variable is the temperature annealing while the dependent variable is the compressive strength and porosity. And wastes natural clay powder mixed and given 5 liters of water, then in print square shaped measuring 6x6x6 cm by 20 pieces to determine the compressive strength and the cylinder-shaped measuring 10 x 7 cm by 4 units to determine the value of porosity. Each of these samples with variations in-Anneal Annealing temperature 7000C, 7500C, 8000C and 8500C using Electric Furnace. After data collection and data analysis of compressive strength and porosity of the importance of the value of the maximum compressive strength of 89.5 kg / cm2 at a temperature of 8500C and this value meets the standards. While the minimum porosity value was 2.10% at the temperature of 8500C.

References

REFERENCE

Alhmali, J. (2007). Student attitudes in the context of the curriculum in Libyan education in middle and high schools (PhD Thesis). Scotland: The University of Glasgow. Retrieved from http://theses.gla.ac.uk/61/ on November 3, 2016.

Brown, G. & Yule, G. 1983. Teaching the spoken language. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Esposito, Janet M. 2012. Getting Over Stage Fright: Becoming an Effective Public Speaker. Shyness is Nice. Missouri: Love Your Life Publishing, Inc.

Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold Publishers.

Ghazali, S. Setia, R., Muthusamy, C. & Jusoff, K. (2009). ESL students‘ attitude towards texts and teaching methods used in literature classes. English language teaching., 2, 51.

Griffiths, Carol. 2011. The traditional/ communicative dichotomy (ELT Journal volume 65/2). The United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Gupta, Deepti. 2004. CLT in India: context and methodology come together (ELT Journal volume 58/2). United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Hamano-Bunce, Douglas. 2011. Talk or chat? Chat-room and spoken interaction in a language classroom (ELT Journal volume 65/3). The United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Hasbi, Muhamad. 2013. The Attitudes of Students from ESL and EFL Countries to English (Register Journal volume 6 No.1). Salatiga: STAIN Salatiga.

Hiep, Pham Hoa. 2007. Communicative Language Teaching: unity within diversity (ELT Journal volume 61/2). The United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Hunter, James. 2012. ‘Small Talk’: Developing Fluency, Accuracy, and Complexity in Speaking (ELT Journal volume 66/1). The United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Liao, Xiaoqing. 2004. The need for CLT in China (ELT Journal volume 58/2). The United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Loo, M. Van Der. 2008. Podiumangst: de schaamte voorbij. Effectmeting van taakconcentratietraining op podiumangst bij conservatoriumstudenten (Translation). The Netherlands Open University: Faculty of Psychology.

Mak, Peter. 2010. Peak performance and Reducing Stage Fright. The Netherlands: Research Group Lifelong Learning in Music & The Arts.

McCroskey, James C. 1976. The Problem of Communication Apprehension in the Classroom (FSC Journal, Vo. 4, No. 2). Florida: Florida Southern College.

Morar Consulting and Pearson English. 2014. American English vs British English. Online publication: https://www.english.com/blog/inspiredtolearn-american-english-vs-british-english (retrieved on November 3, 2016).

North. B. 2014. The CEFR in Practice. The United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Reid, K. 2003. An evaluation of an out-of-school- project in South Wales. Mentoring and Tutoring. Abingdon: Routledge.

Richards, J. C. 2006. Communicative language teaching today. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sayer, Peter. 2005. An intensive approach to building conversational skills (ELT Journal volume 59/1). The United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

The Council of Europe. 2012. The Common European Framework (CEFR). London: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2017-03-15

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 2 (2016)

Section

Artikel

License

Copyright (c) 2017 ARTHA NESA CHANDRA, Djusmaini Djamas, Ramli Ramli

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.