PROSES BERPIKIR MAHASISWA QUITTER DALAM MENYELESAIKAN MASALAH GEOMETRI DENGAN PEMBERIAN SCAFFOLDING DI JURUSAN PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA IAIN BUKITTINGGI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31958/js.v9i1.618Keywords:
Process of Thinking, Student Quiter, Problem Solving and GeometryAbstract
The role of lecturers to improve students  mathematical errors and to lead students to achieve higher potential developments is by (1) facilitating students to connect their  current knowledge to the previous ones, (2) encouraging students to continue learning, (3) providing sufficient assistance (scaffolding) to the students toward independence, (4) trigger students to always think so that the development of the scheme is always increasing, and (5) help students internalize the knowledge so that ultimately can construct his knowledge. Scaffolding is one way to assist students in overcoming difficulties solving geometry problems. The purpose of this research is to describe quitter students' thinking process in solving geometry problem by giving scaffolding in Mathematics Education Department of IAIN Bukittinggi. This research employs qualitative research that seeks to express in depth the process of thinking of quitter students in solving geometry problem by giving scaffolding, by using study process of student mathematics concept and its diagnosis through cognitive map. The results showed that quitter students' thinking process in solving geometry problem with scaffolding was unique and interesting. Each student has different ways of solving problems. Problem of difficulty are also experienced by quitter students. Scaffolding provided varies according to the needs of each student to develop his thinking process. By providing scaffolding in general, the process of thinking the subject of research to develop in line with the structure of the problem.
References
Anthony, L. (1997). “Preaching to Cannibals: A look at Academic Writing in Engineering”.In The Japan Conference on English for Specific Purposes Proceedings. January 31st, 1998.
Basturkmen, H. (2006). Ideas and Options in English for Specific Purposes.London andNew Jersey: ESL and Applied Linguistic Professional Series: Eli Hinkel, Edition.
Bracaj, Morena. (2014). Teaching English for Specific Purposes and Teacher Training. European Scientific Journal January 2014 edition vol.10, No.2 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431
Carver, D. (1983). Some propositions about ESP. The ESP Journal, 2, 131-137.
Chams, Eddine. (2016).An Introduction ToEnglish For SpecificPurposes(Esp):Online Lectures For Third Year ‘Licence’ Level. Abou Bekr Belkaid University – Tlemcen, Faculty Of Arts And Languages, Department Of English
Dudley, E. and St Johns. (1998).Developments in ESP a Multi-Disciplinary Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hutchison, T. & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: a learner-centredapproach. England: Cambridge University Press.
Johns A.M and Dudley, E. (1991) “English for Specific Purposes: International in ScopeSpecific in Purpose”. TESOL Quarterly Vol. 25. no 2: pp 297-314.
Kashani, S. (2007) “Freire‟s Bottom-up Bridges Student Centeredness” inAsian ESPJournal. Vol 5. Issue 1. Article n°6.
Long, M. (2005). A Rationale for Needs Analysis Research.Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.
Mackay, R. and Mountford, A. (1978).English for Specific Purposes: A case StudyApproach.London: Longman.
Miliani, M. (1994) English for Specific Purposes. Seminar presented in MagisterCourse.I.L.E:Tlemcen.
Robinson, P (1980). ESP today.UK: Prentice Hall International ltd.
Soriano, F. I. (1995), Conducting needs assessments: A multidisciplinary approach.University of Michigan, School of Social Work Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.
Strevens, P. (1977).New Orientations in the Teaching of English.Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.
_____(1988) “The Learner and the Teacher of ESP”. in ESP in the classroom: Practiceand evaluation. Chamberlain and Baumgardener. vol. 6; pp 39-44.
Swales, J. (1985). Episodes in ESP. Prentice Hall.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 M.Imamuddin M.Imamuddin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
