Neoliberalisme dan Komersialisasi Pendidikan Tinggi: Ancaman Mobilitas Sosial di Indonesia

Authors

  • Sri Handayani Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta
  • Rustam Ibrahim Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31958/istinarah.v7i2.15881

Keywords:

UKT, PTNBH, Educational Neoliberalism, Access Inequality, Vertical Social Mobility, Indonesian Higher Education

Abstract

The commercialization of education in Indonesia reflects a shift toward neoliberal educational governance, where education is increasingly treated as a market commodity. This trend is evident in significant tuition increases—UKT rates in public universities have risen by 200–400% over the past five years—and the expanding adoption of PTNBH governance models that emphasize financial autonomy and market logic. Drawing on a qualitative literature review, this study examines how commercialization shapes inequality of access and vertical social mobility within Indonesian higher education. Findings indicate that commercialization exacerbates structural disparities, as reflected in the low representation of students from the lowest-income groups—approximately 12% in top-tier public universities (SUSENAS 2024). Such dynamics weaken education’s role as a vehicle for mobility. Policy reforms ensuring affordability and redistributive mechanisms are urgently required.

References

Altbach, Philip G. et al. 2009. Trends in Global Higher Education : Tracking an Academic Revolution.

Ashari, Muhammad. 2024. “Dampak Komersialisasi Pendidikan Tinggi: UKT Mahal Dan PTNBH.” PikiranRakyat 10(3):1006–11.

firman. 2023. “Pemerintah Alokasikan Anggaran Pendidikan Tahun 2023.” Kementrian Euangan Rebuplik Indonesia. Retrieved (https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/informasi-publik/publikasi/berita-utama/anggaran-pendidikan-tahun-2023-sebesar-rp608,3-t?utm_source=chatgpt.com).

Indicators, Oecd. 2021. Education at a Glance 2021.

Irawati, A. Kahar. 2008. “Konsep Kepemimpinan Dalam Perubahan Organisasi (Organizational Change) Pada Perpustakaan Perguruan Tinggi.” Jurnal Studi Perpustakaan Dan Informasi Vol.4, No.(1):1–7.

Marginson, S. 2016. The Dream of Higher Education.

Mukholil. 2018. “Kecemasan dalam Proses Belajar.” Kecemasan Dalam Proses Belajar 8:1–8.

Mulyadi, Asal Wahyuni Erlin. 2017. “Policy of Inclusive Education for Education for All in Indonesia.” Policy & Governance Review 1(3):201. doi: 10.30589/pgr.v1i3.57.

Olssen, M. Peters, M. A. 2005. “Neoliberalism, Higher Education and the Knowledge Economy: From the Free Market to Knowledge Capitalism.” Journal of Education Policy 3(20).

Parjiyatmi, and Siti Maisaroh. 2024. “Komersial Pendidikan Yang Terjadi Di Indonesia.” Adi Karsa: Jurnal Teknologi Komunikasi Pendidikan 15(1):64–69.

Pipin, and Yelli Eka Sumadhinata. 2024. “Commodification Of Education In Transactional Leadership (A Literature Review Study).” International Journal Of Humanities Education And Social Sciences (IJHESS) 4(1):159–64.

Sari, Tika Nirmala et al. 2022. “Analisis Kualitas Pelayanan Yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Nilai Pelanggan Pada Bisnis Jasa Pendidikan Tinggi.” Warta Dharmawangsa 16(4):981–1001. doi: 10.46576/wdw.v16i4.2449.

Susanto, Teguh Trianung Djoko et al. 2025. “Biaya Tersembunyi Dan Ketimpangan Akses Pendidikan Di Indonesia : Analisis Kebijakan Dan Dampak Sosial-Ekonomi.” Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Dan Riset Pendidikan 3(4):3282–88.

Syekhfani. 2020. Manajemen Pendidikan: Teori Dan Praktik.

Uci Dwi Cahya, Janner Simarmata. 2023. Inovasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Digital Abad 21.

UNESCO. 2024. “Pemantauan Pendidikan Global (GEM).” European Agency. Retrieved (www.european-agency.org/news/2024-gem-report).

Downloads

Published

2025-12-26