Commercialization of Education and Its Implications for Social Inequality in Indonesia

Penulis

  • Sri Handayani Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta
  • Rustam Ibrahim Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31958/istinarah.v7i2.15881

Kata Kunci:

UKT, PTNBH, Educational Neoliberalism, Access Inequality, Vertical Social Mobility, Indonesian Higher Education

Abstrak

The commercialization of education in Indonesia demonstrates a paradigm shift from education as a basic right of citizens to a traded commodity. This phenomenon is reflected in rising education costs, the growth of business-based educational institutions, and a profit-oriented approach to educational institution management. This research uses a qualitative approach with a literature review method to examine the impact of commercialization on social inequality. The results indicate that the commercialization of education widens the gap in access and quality of education between upper and lower economic groups, and hinders social mobility. While there are positive impacts such as improved educational quality and innovation, the negative impacts are more pronounced, particularly in terms of inequitable access and psychological distress. Therefore, policy interventions that support social justice are needed to ensure education remains a universal right, not simply a market-driven service.

Keywords:  Commercialization of education, social inequality, access to education, and neoliberalism.

Referensi

Altbach, Philip G. et al. 2009. Trends in Global Higher Education : Tracking an Academic Revolution.

Ashari, Muhammad. 2024. “Dampak Komersialisasi Pendidikan Tinggi: UKT Mahal Dan PTNBH.” PikiranRakyat 10(3):1006–11.

firman. 2023. “Pemerintah Alokasikan Anggaran Pendidikan Tahun 2023.” Kementrian Euangan Rebuplik Indonesia. Retrieved (https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/informasi-publik/publikasi/berita-utama/anggaran-pendidikan-tahun-2023-sebesar-rp608,3-t?utm_source=chatgpt.com).

Indicators, Oecd. 2021. Education at a Glance 2021.

Irawati, A. Kahar. 2008. “Konsep Kepemimpinan Dalam Perubahan Organisasi (Organizational Change) Pada Perpustakaan Perguruan Tinggi.” Jurnal Studi Perpustakaan Dan Informasi Vol.4, No.(1):1–7.

Marginson, S. 2016. The Dream of Higher Education.

Mukholil. 2018. “Kecemasan dalam Proses Belajar.” Kecemasan Dalam Proses Belajar 8:1–8.

Mulyadi, Asal Wahyuni Erlin. 2017. “Policy of Inclusive Education for Education for All in Indonesia.” Policy & Governance Review 1(3):201. doi: 10.30589/pgr.v1i3.57.

Olssen, M. Peters, M. A. 2005. “Neoliberalism, Higher Education and the Knowledge Economy: From the Free Market to Knowledge Capitalism.” Journal of Education Policy 3(20).

Parjiyatmi, and Siti Maisaroh. 2024. “Komersial Pendidikan Yang Terjadi Di Indonesia.” Adi Karsa: Jurnal Teknologi Komunikasi Pendidikan 15(1):64–69.

Pipin, and Yelli Eka Sumadhinata. 2024. “Commodification Of Education In Transactional Leadership (A Literature Review Study).” International Journal Of Humanities Education And Social Sciences (IJHESS) 4(1):159–64.

Sari, Tika Nirmala et al. 2022. “Analisis Kualitas Pelayanan Yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Nilai Pelanggan Pada Bisnis Jasa Pendidikan Tinggi.” Warta Dharmawangsa 16(4):981–1001. doi: 10.46576/wdw.v16i4.2449.

Susanto, Teguh Trianung Djoko et al. 2025. “Biaya Tersembunyi Dan Ketimpangan Akses Pendidikan Di Indonesia : Analisis Kebijakan Dan Dampak Sosial-Ekonomi.” Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Dan Riset Pendidikan 3(4):3282–88.

Syekhfani. 2020. Manajemen Pendidikan: Teori Dan Praktik.

Uci Dwi Cahya, Janner Simarmata. 2023. Inovasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Digital Abad 21.

UNESCO. 2024. “Pemantauan Pendidikan Global (GEM).” European Agency. Retrieved (www.european-agency.org/news/2024-gem-report).

##submission.downloads##

Diterbitkan

2025-12-26