Peran Imajinasi Sosiologis dalam Tindakan Sosial Literasi Digital Kritis Mahasiswa Menghadapi Disinformasi Media Sosial

Authors

  • Dalfah Aulia Nisa Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • Yustika Irfani Lindawati Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31958/istinarah.v8i1.16807

Keywords:

Sociological Imagination,, Social Action,, Critical Digital Literacy,, Disinformation,, Social Media

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role of sociological imagination in shaping students ' social actions in the face of disinformation on social media through critical digital literacy. The method used is qualitative with a case study approach. The Data were collected through in-depth interviews with six students of the Sociology Education Study Program Class 2023 of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University who were selected using purposive sampling techniques. Data analysis was conducted using interactive models through the stages of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion, then interpreted using Max Weber's theory of social action and the concept of sociological imagination Peter L. Berger. The results showed that students' critical digital literacy develops through three main stages, namely exposure to disinformation, reflection and verification processes, and the formation of critical social actions. Students will not only be able to verify, but also be able to understand the social context behind the content received and build critical discussions in academic and social environments. These findings confirm that critical digital literacy is not just a technical skill, but rather a social process that involves reflection, structural awareness, and collective responsibility in dealing with the flow of disinformation in the digital age.

References

Alam, A. S., Nur, M., Arisnawawi, A., & Akhmad, M. A. (2025). Persepsi mahasiswa pendidikan sosiologi terhadap urgensi literasi sosial dalam meningkatkan kesadaran kritis mahasiswa sebagai generasi muda [Students’ perceptions of the urgency of social literacy in enhancing critical awareness among sociology education students as young adults]. Al-Ihtiram: Multidisciplinary Journal of Counseling and Social Research, 4(2), 557–586. https://doi.org/10.59027/al-ihtiram.v4i2.1119

Berger, P. L. (1963). Invitation to Sociology. A Humanistic Perspective. Harmondsworth: (Penguin).

Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research design pendekatan metode kuantitatif, kualitatif dan campuran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.

Darmawan, D., Fauzi, A., & Siregar, H. (2024). Pengembangan Kompetensi Literasi Digital Warga Belajar Pendidikan Kesetaraan dalam Menghadapi Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat, 9(2), 397–404. https://doi.org/10.30653/jppm.v9i2.730

Kuntari, S. (2022). Pentingnya budaya literasi digital di masa pandemi. Dalam Prosiding Seminar Nasional Inovasi Pendidikan (Seminar Nasional I). Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan IAIN Palangka Raya. https://e-proceedings.iainpalangkaraya.ac.id/index.php/PSNIP/article/view/755

Lewandowsky, S., & Van Der Linden, S. (2021). Countering misinformation and fake news through inoculation and prebunking. European Review of Social Psychology, 32(2), 348–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2021.1876983

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. Sage.

Nisa, K. (2024). Peran literasi di era digital dalam menghadapi hoaks dan disinformasi di media sosial. Impressive: Journal of Education, 2(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.61502/ijoe.v2i1.75

Pratama, F. R., Komariah, N., & Rodiah, S. (2022). Hubungan antara kemampuan literasi digital dengan pencegahan berita hoaks di kalangan mahasiswa. Information: Journal of Library and Information Science, 2(3), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.24198/inf.v2i3.43792

Risdiana, R., Setiawan, R., & Afrizal, S. (2024). Partisipasi Netizen pada Kesadaran Literasi Digital di Kecamatan Ciledug. EDU SOCIATA (JURNAL PENDIDIKAN SOSIOLOGI), 7(1), 400–411. https://doi.org/10.33627/es.v7i1.2032

Roozenbeek, J., Maertens, R., Herzog, S. M., Geers, M., Kurvers, R., Sultan, M., & Van Der Linden, S. (2022). Susceptibility to misinformation is consistent across question framings and response modes and better explained by myside bias and partisanship than analytical thinking. Judgment and Decision Making, 17(3), 547–573. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500003570

Setiawan, R. (2020). Karakteristik dasar literasi digital dan relasi sosial generasi milenial banten. Sosioglobal: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Sosiologi, 4(2), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.24198/jsg.v4i2.27540

Setiawan, R., Yulianto, Y., Hidayat, S., Asmawati, L., & Afrizal, S. (2025). Contextual Sociology Learning Design: Integration of Dick and Carey and Angkringan Pedagogy to Develop Sociological Imagination. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 15(2), 1290–1309. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v15i2.pp1290-1309

Tracy, S. J. (2020). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policymaking (Vol. 27). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

We Are Social & Kepios. (2025). Digital 2025: Indonesia. https://datareportal. com/reports/digital-2025-indonesia

Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (Vol. 2). University of California Press.

Wera, M. (2020). Meretas makna post-truth: analisis kontekstual hoaks emosi sosial, dan populisme agama. Societas Dei: Jurnal Agama Dan Masyarakat, 7(1), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.33550/sd.v7i1.141

Published

2026-06-02