DFT+U Investigation of Electronic Properties of CuO/Fe₂O₃ Heterojunction: Band Gap Engineering and Charge Transfer Mechanism for Photocatalytic Water Splitting

Authors

  • Maulana Reizqy Anughrah Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2352-2533
  • Riri Jonuarti Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia
  • Leni Azius Fitri Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia
  • Eka Susanti Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31958/js.v18i1.17327

Keywords:

DFT U, α-Fe2O3, water splitting, CuO/Fe2O3 heterojunction, band-gap engineering, S-scheme

Abstract

The development of efficient, earth-abundant photocatalysts for solar water splitting remains a central challenge in renewable-energy research. The electronic properties of , a  heterojunction, and the adsorption of water-derived species on the  surface were investigated using spin-polarized first-principles calculations within the DFT+U framework, as implemented in the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP) with the GGA-PBE functional and Hubbard corrections of U = 5.3 eV (Fe-3d) and U=6.5 eV (Cu-3d). The pristine  slab exhibits an indirect band gap of 1.28 eV, with the valence band maximum (VBM) at Γ and the conduction band minimum (CBM) between Y and Γ; the valence band is dominated by O-2p states and the conduction band by Fe-3d states, while symmetric spin channels confirm its antiferromagnetic character. Formation of the  heterojunction widens the indirect gap to 1.61 eV (Δ= +0.33 eV), driven by hybridization of Cu-3d and Fe-3d orbitals that lifts the lower conduction band, with empty Cu-s states appearing near 2.8 eV above the Fermi level. The orbital redistribution is suggestive of an S-scheme charge-transfer mechanism in which CuO acts as the reduction photocatalyst and  as the oxidation photocatalyst. Among the adsorbed species, the interaction strength increases in the order  < • < •, with • showing the strongest Fe–O orbital hybridization. The gap remains below experimental value (2.1 eV). These results point to  as candidate visible-light S-scheme photocatalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction, while a quantitative assessment of the reaction is left for future work.

References

Alamgir, Mushtaq, N., Ahmad, A., Erum, J. K. E., Li, L., Qian, J., Wang, X., & Gao, J. (2025). Shaping the future of solar-driven photocatalysis by reticular framework materials. Journal of Materials Science & Technology, 231, 193–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2025.02.009

Blöchl, P. E. (1994). Projector augmented-wave method. Physical Review. B, Condensed Matter, 50(24), 17953–17979. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.50.17953

Dudarev, S., & Botton, G. (1998). Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+U study. Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 57(3), 1505–1509. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.57.1505

Fujishima, A., & Honda, K. (1972). Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode. Nature, 238(5358), 37–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/238037a0

Gao, R.-T., Zhang, J., Nakajima, T., He, J., Liu, X., Zhang, X., Wang, L., & Wu, L. (2023). Single-atomic-site platinum steers photogenerated charge carrier lifetime of hematite nanoflakes for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Nature Communications, 14(1), 2640. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38343-6

Guo, Y., Tan, X., Yu, T., & Gong, J. (2026). Recent Advances of Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution via Water Vapor Splitting. Advanced Functional Materials, 36(17), e22276. https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/adfm.202522276

Hofmann, O. T., Zojer, E., Hörmann, L., Jeindl, A., & Maurer, R. J. (2021). First-principles calculations of hybrid inorganic-organic interfaces: From state-of-the-art to best practice. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 23(14), 8132–8180. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cp06605b

Huang, X., Ramadugu, S. K., & Mason, S. E. (2016). Surface-Specific DFT + U Approach Applied to α-Fe2O3(0001). The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 120(9), 4919–4930. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b12144

Jiang, Z., , Zhang, L., & Yu, J. (2023). Research Progress on S-Scheme Heterojunction Photocatalyst. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 51(1), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.14062/j.issn.0454-5648.20220459

Kresse, G., & Hafner, J. (1993). Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B, 47(1), 558–561. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.47.558

Kyesmen, P. I., Nombona, N., & Diale, M. (2021). Heterojunction of nanostructured α-Fe2O3/CuO for enhancement of photoelectrochemical water splitting. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 863, 158724. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925838821001316

Low, J., Yu, J., Jaroniec, M., Wageh, S., & Al-Ghamdi, A. A. (2017). Heterojunction Photocatalysts. Advanced Materials, 29(20), 1601694. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201601694

Lv, D., Gao, J., Shao, Y., Wang, Y., Pan, J., Cong, Y., & Lv, S.-W. (2025). Internal electric field triggered charge redistribution in CuO/Fe(2)O(3) composite to regulate the peroxymonosulfate activation for enhancing the degradation of organic pollutants. Environmental Pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987), 367, 125618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125618

Monkhorst, H. J., & Pack, J. D. (1976). Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B, 13(12), 5188–5192. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188

Nallapureddy, R. R., Arla, S. K., Ibáñez, A., Pabba, D. P., Jung, J. H., & Joo, S. W. (2025). Photosensitizer and Charge Separator Roles of g-C₃N₄ Integrated into the CuO-Fe₂O₃ p-n Heterojunction Interface for Elevating PEC Water Splitting Potential. Nanomaterials, 15(7), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15070551

Naveas, N., Pulido, R., Marini, C., Hernández-Montelongo, J., & Silván, M. M. (2023). First-principles calculations of hematite (α-Fe2O3) by self-consistent DFT+U+V. IScience, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.106033

Nørskov, J. K., Rossmeisl, J., Logadottir, A., Lindqvist, L., Kitchin, J. R., Bligaard, T., & Jónsson, H. (2004). Origin of the Overpotential for Oxygen Reduction at a Fuel-Cell Cathode. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B, 108(46), 17886–17892. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp047349j

Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., & Ernzerhof, M. (1996). Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett., 77(18), 3865–3868. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865

Sivula, K., Le Formal, F., & Grätzel, M. (2011). Solar Water Splitting: Progress Using Hematite (α-Fe2O3) Photoelectrodes. ChemSusChem, 4(4), 432–449. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201000416

Tanwar, K., Lo, C., Eng, P., Catalano, J., Walko, D., Brown, G., Waychunas, G., Chaka, A., & Trainor, T. (2007). Surface diffraction study of the hydrated hematite (1-102) surface. Surface Science, 601, 460–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2006.10.021

Walter, M. G., Warren, E. L., McKone, J. R., Boettcher, S. W., Mi, Q., Santori, E. A., & Lewis, N. S. (2010). Solar Water Splitting Cells. Chemical Reviews, 110(11), 6446–6473. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr1002326

Wang, V., Xu, N., Liu, J.-C., Tang, G., & Geng, W.-T. (2021). VASPKIT: A user-friendly interface facilitating high-throughput computing and analysis using VASP code. Computer Physics Communications, 267, 108033. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108033

Xu, Q., Zhang, L., Cheng, B., Fan, J., & Yu, J. (2020). S-Scheme Heterojunction Photocatalyst. Chem, 6(7), 1543–1559. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2020.06.010

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

Issue

Section

Artikel