STUDENTSÔÇÖ PREFERENCES TOWARD LECTURERSÔÇÖ TYPES IN GIVING CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON THEIR SPEAKING

Authors

  • Silfia Rahmi IAIN Batusangkar
  • Sirajul Munir IAIN Batusangkar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v23i1.1364

Keywords:

StudentsÔÇÖ Preferences, Corrective Feedbacks, Speaking

Abstract

The current study aims at investigating the studentsÔÇÖ preferences toward types of corrective feedback applied by the lecturers on their speaking. ┬áThis research used a descriptive method. The participants of this research were 151 non English department students who took English subject. The instruments used to collect the data were questionnaire and interview guide. Those were adapted from Hyang (2010), Katayama (2007), together with Smith. They became the guideline on this research. The data┬á gathered from questionaire were analyzed by using formula suggested by Heaton and Arikunto. Then, the data obtained from interview guide were analyzed by using theory proposed by Miles and Huberman. ┬áThe research findings indicate that most students preferred to receive explicit corrective feedback using metalinguistic correction. It was caused by lack of language exposure due to limited┬á language knowledge they possess.

References

Achmad et al. 2012.Layanan cinta: Perwujudan layanan prima perpustakaan. Jakarta, Sagung Seto.

Arief. 2007. Pemasaran Jasa dan Kualitas Pelayanan (Bagaimana mengelola kualitas pelayanan yang memuaskan pelanggan). Malang: Namyuwangi Publishing.

Asrukin, Mochammad. 2001. Sikap Mahasiswa Terhadap Fasilitas dan Pelayanan Perpustakaan IKIP Malang. Tesis, Universitas Indonesia. Tidak dipublikasikan

Fatmawati, Endang. 2013. Mata Baru Penelitian Perpustakaan dari SERVQUAL ke LIBQUAL. Jakarta, Sagung Seto.

Kotler, Philip dan Keller. 2009. Manajemen Pemasaran. Ed. 13. Jakarta, Erlangga.

Kotler, Philip. 2000. Manajemen Pemasaran. Terjemahan Benjamin Molan. Jil. 1. Jakarta, Prenhallindo.

Novianti, Haning Tri, Mindartati, Lely Indah & Hermintatik. 2018. Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Pengunjung (Syudi pada PErpustakaan Umum dan Arsip Kota Malang). Jurnal Administrasi Publik (JAP), Vol. 3. No. 5, Hal. 789-794. Malang.

Perpustakaan Nasional Republik Indonesia. 2011. Standar Nasional Perpustakaan (SNP): Perpustakaan Provinsi, Perpustakaan Kabupaten/Kota, Perpustakaan Kecamatan, Perpustakaan Desa/Kelurahan, Perpustakaan Khusus Instansi Pemerintah. Jakarta, Perpustakaan Nasional Republik Indonesia.

Rambat, Lupiyadi 2006. Manajemen Pemasaran Jasa:Teori dan Praktek. Jakarta, Salemba Empat.

Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Cet.18. Bandung, Alfabeta.

Sulistyo-Basuki. 1992. Teknik dan Jasa Dokumentasi. Jakarta, Gramedia.

Sutarno, NS. 2004. Manajemen Perpustakaan: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta, Samitra Media Utama.

Zulganef. 2002. Analisis Diskriminan terhadap Factor-faktor yang Membedakan Sering Tidaknya Konsumen Mengkonsumsi Jasa Manajemen Usahawan Indonesia, 31 (3) maret; 22-28.

Zurni, Zahara Samosir. 2005. Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Mahasiswa Menggunakan Perpustakaan USU. Pustaha: Jurnal Studi Perpustakaan dan Informasi, Vol. 1, No. 1, Juni 2005. Universitas Sumatera Utara: Deparment Studi Perpustakaan dan Informasi.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-26

How to Cite

Rahmi, S., & Munir, S. (2020). STUDENTSÔÇÖ PREFERENCES TOWARD LECTURERSÔÇÖ TYPES IN GIVING CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON THEIR SPEAKING. Ta’dib, 23(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v23i1.1364

Issue

Vol. 23 No. 1 (2020)

Section

Artikel

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Silfia Rahmi; Sirajul Munir

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a?áCreative Commons Attribution License?á(CC-BY-NC)?áthat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.