Prohibitive Expressions as Traditional Cultural Dynamics among Muslim

Authors

  • Ahmad Jamin IAIN Kerinci
  • Heri Mudra IAIN Kerinci
  • Jamal Mirdad IAIN Kerinci

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31958/jsk.v8i1.11876

Keywords:

Prohibitive expression, Local wisdom, Muslims, Traditional cultural dynamics

Abstract

It is undeniable that oral traditions such as prohibitive expressions not only lead to careful attitude, but also presents identities as Muslim societies. While their existence remains controversial in Islamic perspectives, more societies believe in their function and contribution over safety, effectiveness, and discipline in a particular situation. Meanwhile, this study investigated oral traditions regarding prohibitive expressions that protect societies from any hazard during pregnancy, babies and child, and marriage. Intensive interviews were employed to collect data from a number of participants selected through purposive sampling. As for results, it is believed that the prohibitive expressions comprised some contexts such as during pregnancy, for babies and child, and marriage. Each expression was a mixture between traditional culture or local wisdom and Islam as a religion with strict rules. Although the expressions were not identified to emerge in Islamic context as a whole, the societies presumably believed in religious supports that allow them to practice the local wisdom without avoiding Islam

References

Ali Imron, Manajemen Peserta Didik Berbasis Sekolah (Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2012).h

Damayanti F.A. (2013). Studi tentang Perilaku Membolo pada Siswa SMA Swasta di Surabaya. Jurnal BK Unesa Vol.3. No.1

Elizabeth B Hurlock. 1999. Child Development. Jakarta: Erlangga

-------------------------. 1978. Perkembangan Anak. Jakarta: Erlangga.

-------------------------. 1980. Psikologi Perkembangan. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Gunarsa, Singgih dan Gunarsa, Singgih Yulia. 2008. Psikologi Perkembangan Anak dan Remaja. Jakarta : Gunung Mulia. Bandung: Angkasa Raya.

Hurlock, Elizabeth B. (1978). Perkembangan Anak Jilid 2. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Ichsani,W. 2007. _studi tentang faktor penyebab dan alternatif penyelesaian masalah perilaku membolos pada siswa_. Surakarta ; Universitas sebelas maret

Suparlan Suhartono. (2008). Filsafat Pendidikan.Yogyakarta: Ar-ruzz Media.

Nani Triani & Amir. (2013). Pendidikan Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus Lamban Belajar.Slow Learner. Jakarta: PT. Luxima Metro.Media.

Khanisa, S. 2012. Pengaruh Layanan Konseling Kelompok dengan Menggunakan Teknik Pendekatan Behavior untuk Mengatasi Perilaku Membolos. Semarang.

Kartono, Kartini. (1985). Bimbingan Bagi Anak dan Remaja yang Bermasalah.Jakarta: CV Rajawali.

Kearney, Christopher A. (2001). School Refusal Behavior In Youth A Functional Approach To Assessment And Treatment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association

Ngalim Purwanto, 1990. Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta

Smet, Bart. (1994). Psikologi Kesehatan. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia

Supriyo. (2008).Olivia R. F. (2017). Hubungan Antara Kontrol Diri dengan Perilaku Membolos Siswa Kelas X SMKN 1 Ngasem Kediri TahunAjaran 2016/2017 [Skripsi].Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri. Semarang: CV. Nieuw Setapak.

Prayitno. (2004). Layanan Konseling Perorangan. Padang: Universitas Negeri Padang Press.

Olivia, R. F. (2017). Hubungan Antara Kontrol Diri dengan Perilaku Membolos Siswa Kelas X SMKN 1 Ngasem Kediri Tahun Ajaran 2016/2017 [Skripsi]. Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri.

Simandjuntak, B. (1983). Latar Belakang Kenakalan Remaja. Bandung: Penerbit Alumni.

Sari, N. K. (2016). Hubungan Antara Peran keluarga dengan Kecenderungan Perilaku Delinkuen pada Remaja [Skripsi]. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Downloads

Published

2024-06-03

How to Cite

Jamin, A., Mudra, H., & Mirdad, J. (2024). Prohibitive Expressions as Traditional Cultural Dynamics among Muslim. Alfuad: Jurnal Sosial Keagamaan, 8(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.31958/jsk.v8i1.11876

Issue

Section

Articles