Afirmasi Hadis terhadap Estetika Uslūb Mufrad dan Jamā‘ dalam al Qur’an: Telaah Linguistik dalam Perspektif Ulūmul Qur’an

Aulya Adhli; Nur Hamidah Pulungan; Muhammad Akbar Rosyidi Datmi; Arwansyah bin Kirin

doi:10.31958/istinarah.v7i2.15896

Authors

Aulya Adhli Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Mandailing Natal
Nur Hamidah Pulungan Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Mandailing Natal
Muhammad Akbar Rosyidi Datmi Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Arwansyah bin Kirin Universitas Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31958/istinarah.v7i2.15896

Keywords:

Qur’anic Sciences, Hadith Studies, Singular Form, Plural Form, Qur’anic Rhetorical Style

Abstract

This study investigates the linguistic significance of singular (mufrad) and plural (jamʿ) forms in the Qur’an by examining nine key lemmas; ard, shams, qamar, ṣirāṭ, dīn, nūr, nafs, rīḥ/riyāḥ, and muslim. These lexical items display notable morphological variation and shifting grammatical functions, reflecting layered semantic distinctions within the Qur’anic discourse. Using a qualitative descriptive method, the research analyzes all Qur’anic verses containing these lemmas through a linguistic–morphological approach and intertextual comparison with prophetic traditions. The analytical framework draws on balāghah, Qur’anic inimitability (iʿjāz al-Qur’an), and lexical exegesis. Findings show that singular forms predominantly express universal, essential, or conceptual meanings, while plural forms convey empirical plurality, contextual diversity, or intensified social nuance. Prophetic hadith affirm and clarify these semantic patterns by offering interpretive guidance that reinforces or refines Qur’anic usage. The integration of Qur’anic and hadith data reveals that morphological variation in the Qur’an functions not merely as stylistic choice but as a coherent theological–aesthetic structure. This study contributes to Qur’anic linguistic scholarship by providing an integrative framework for understanding the semantic and rhetorical interplay between singular and plural forms in the sacred text.

References

Al-Baghawi, A. M. al-H. ibn M. (1997). Ma‘alim at-Tanzil (Cet. 4). Beirut: Dar Tayyibah.

Al-Baqa‘iy, M. F. ‘Abd. (2000). Al-Mu‘jam Al-Mufahras Li Alfaz Al-Qur’an Al-Karim. Jakarta: Maktabah Dahlan.

Al-Hakim, M. bin A. (1411). Mustadrak ala al-Sahihain (1st ed.). Dar al-Kutub al-’Alamiyah.

Al-Jurjānī, A. al-Q. (1992). Dalā’il al-I‘jāz (‘Abd al-Rahmān ‘Iyād, Ed.). Cairo: Dār al-Ma‘ārif.

Al-Qadir, M. al-A. ibn M. al-M. ibn ‘Abd. (1995). Adwa’ al-Bayan fi Idah al-Qur’an bi al-Qur’an (Juz 4). Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.

Al-Qaraḍāwī, Y. (2000). Kayfa Nataʿāmal ma‘a al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah (pp. 1–213). pp. 1–213. Kairo: Dār al-Syurūq.

Al-Qurtubiy, A. ‘Abd A. M. ibn A. ibn A. B. ibn F. al-A. (1985). al-Jami‘ li Ahkam al-Qur’an (20 Juz: Ju). Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāṡ al-`Arabiy.

Al-Suyūṭī, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān. (2008). Al-Itqān fī ʿUlūm al-Qur’ān, (Juz 2). Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah.

Al-Tirmidhī, M. ibn ‘Īsā. (n.d.). al-Jāmi‘ al-Ṣaḥīḥ Sunan al-Tirmidhī (5 Juz; A. M. Shākir, Ed.). Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī.

Al-Tirmiżi Abū ‘Īsā Muḥammad ibn ‘Īsā ibn Saurah ibn Mūsā al-Ḍaḥḥak. (n.d.). Al-Jāmi‘ al-Kabïr wahuwa Sunan al-Tirmiżi (pertama; Basysyār ‘Awad Ma‘rūf, Ed.). Beirut: Dār al-Garb al-Islāmiy, 1998.

Almunawar, A. W., Islamiyah, Setyawan, R., Qatrunnada, S., Afrianto, R., & Fiy, M. S. F. (2024). Kaidah Mufrad d an Jama ’ dalam Menafsirkan Al- Qur ’ an. Wahana Islamika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 10(2), 31–47.

An-Naisaburiy, A. I. A. ibn M. ibn I. as-S. (2002). al-Kasyf wa al-Bayan (10 Juz; J. 5, Ed.). Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāṡ al-`Arabiy.

Indarto, D. (2010). Rangkuman Pengetahuan Alam Lengkap (Cet. 1). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Widyatama.

Jamil, S., & Alwizar. (2025). Kaidah Bahasa dalam Menafsirkan Al-Qur’an. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pemikiran, 20(1), 1895–1904.

Kementrian Agama RI. (2001). Al-Qur’an & Tafsirnya: Edisi Yang Disempurnakan. Jakarta: Kementerian Agama RI.

Khalid, M. R. (2012). Kaidah-Kaidah Untuk Menafsirkan Al-Quran. Jurnal Al-Hikmah, XIII(1), 59–82.

Mahmood, H. (2014). The Qur’ān’s Communal Ideology: Rhetoric and Representation In Scripture and Early Historiography. New York: Cornell University.

Mahmud, A. H. (1975). Al-Balāghah al-Qur’āniyyah. Cairo: Maktabah al-Nahḍah.

Muhammad ʿAjjāj al-Khaṭīb, U. al-Ḥadīth. (1989). ʿUlūmuhu wa Muṣṭalaḥuhu. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.

Mursyid, A. (2019). Sisi-Sisi Keindahan Bahasa Al- Qur’an. Misykat, 04(2), 23–60.

Muslim ibn Ḥajjāj, A. al-Ḥasan. (2001). Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. Kairo: Dar ibn al-Haitsam.

Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd, M. al-N. (1998). Dirāsah fī ʿUlūm al-Qur’ān. Beirut: Al-Markaz al-Thaqāfī al-ʿArabī.

Nurfazri, N. E., Firjatullah, F., Alhadi, A. H., & Dahlan, A. (2025). Analisis Komparatif I’rab dalam Dua Aspek: Studi Perbandingan Antara I’rab Lafzhi dan I’rab Taqdiri. Al-Furqan : Jurnal Agama, Sosial, Dan Budaya, 4(3), 389–403.

Nurkhatiqah, A., Fitri, C., & Rahmatina, D. (2022). Bedah Makna , Unsur dan Aspek Ijaz Al-Quran. MUSHAF JOURNAL : Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran Dan Hadis, 2(2), 150–158.

Poniran, & Brata, P. D. (2005). Sains. Yogyakarta: ANDI, Lembaga Pendidikan Primagama dan Forum Pengkajian Primagama.

Rizqi, P. S., & Kultsum, U. (2025). Menelusuri Integrasi Fungsi Estetika dan Etika dalam Membaca Al- Qur ’ an Konsep Estetika dalam Membaca Al- Qur ’ an. Jurnal Budi Pekerti Agama Islam, 3(5), 15–30.

Sa‘id, ‘Abd ar-Rahman ibn Abi al-Wafa Muhammad ibn ‘Ubaid Allah ibn Abi.’ (1995). Asrar Al-‘Arabiyyah (F. S. Qadarah, Ed.). Beirut: Dār al-Salām.

Subakir, F., Uswatunnissa, N., Hidayatullah, E. A., Agustono, I., & Silmiy, A. N. (2023). الفروق اللغوية بين كلمتي “أعين وعيون” في القرآن الكريم الدراسة الدلالية القرآنية. AL-AFKAR: Journal for Islamic Studies, 6(1), 415–425. doi: 10.31943/afkarjournal.v6i2.504.

Toriyono, M. D., Sibilana, A. R., Ahmad, Z., & Salsabila, A. J. (2025). Linguistic Culture in Classical Arabic : Aesthetic Perspectives on Ḥadẓ and Ziyādah in the Qur ’ an. MIMBAR AGAMA DAN BUDAYA, 42(1), 181–197.