INTERACTION OF MACROECONOMIC VARIABLE SHOCKS AND MONETARY POLICY INTERVENTIONS ON THE PROFITABILITY OF SHARIA COMMERCIAL BANKS IN INDONESIA
Abstract
Background. Economic growth and financial development in Indonesia are supported by developments in the Islamic banking industry. The business continuity of Islamic banking is determined by financial performance, which is measured by the level of profitability. The profitability of Islamic commercial banks is thought to be influenced by macroeconomic variables and monetary policy interventions.
Purpose. This study aims to analyze the effect of shocks on macroeconomic variables, including the real effective exchange rate and consumer price index, and monetary policy intervention through the policy instrument of the Indonesian central bank's benchmark interest rate, namely the BI Rate, and the effect of the capital adequacy ratio on the profitability of Islamic commercial banks in Indonesia in the short and long term.
Method. This study employs error-correction model analysis to completely utilize secondary data from January 2015 to May 2022. Data gathered from the Financial Services Authority's (OJK) Sharia Banking Statistics and Fred Economic Data (FED)
Results. The research results show that the real effective exchange rate and consumer price index affect the profitability of Indonesian commercial banks in the long term but do not have a significant effect on the profitability of Islamic commercial banks in the short term. Monetary policy does not have a significant effect in the short or long term. Meanwhile, the capital adequacy ratio has a significant influence on the profitability of Islamic commercial banks in the short and long term.
Conclusion. Macroeconomic variable shocks have the ability to disrupt banking performance in the short term, and this situation shows that banking management has not put flexible policies and a strategic approach to short-term changes in place. Short-term changes are still managed from the standpoint of handling internal conditions, however management is fairly effective at controlling capital adequacy.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Azad, A. S. M. S., Azmat, S., & Hayat, A. (2023). What determines the profitability of Islamic banks: Lending or fee? International Review of Economics & Finance, 86(May), 882–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2019.05.015
Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Merrouche, O. (2013). Islamic vs. conventional banking: Business model, efficiency and stability. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(2), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.09.016
Chen, Q., Katagiri, M., & Surti, J. (2022). Monetary surprises and bank equity valuation with prolonged low interest rates. Finance Research Letters, 47, 102608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102608
Dang, V. D., & Dang, V. C. (2020). The conditioning role of performance on the bank risk-taking channel of monetary policy: Evidence from a multiple-tool regime. Research in International Business and Finance, 54, 101301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101301
Dang, V. D., & Huynh, J. (2022). Monetary policy and bank performance: The role of business models. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 59, 101602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2021.101602
Hussain, M., Bashir, A., Wang, C., & Wang, Y. (2023). World uncertainty, natural resources, consumer prices, and financial development in high-income countries. Resources Policy, 81, 103302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103302
İncekara, A., & Çetinkaya, H. (2019). Liquidity Risk Management: A Comparative Analysis of Panel Data Between Islamic And Conventional Banking In Turkey. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 955–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.136
Jan, A., Marimuthu, M., & @ Mat Isa, M. P. bin M. (2019). The nexus of sustainability practices and financial performance: From the perspective of Islamic banking. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 703–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.208
Joaqui-Barandica, O., Manotas-Duque, D. F., & Uribe, J. M. (2022). Commonality, macroeconomic factors and banking profitability. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 62, 101714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2022.101714
Mamatzakis, E., & Bermpei, T. (2016). What is the effect of unconventional monetary policy on bank performance? Journal of International Money and Finance, 67, 239–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2016.05.005
Mensi, W., Hammoudeh, S., Tiwari, A. K., & Al-Yahyaee, K. H. (2020). Impact of Islamic banking development and major macroeconomic variables on economic growth for Islamic countries: Evidence from panel smooth transition models. Economic Systems, 44(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2019.100739
Nguyen, H., Le, Q., Vu, T., Nguyen, H., & Schinckus, C. (2022). Heliyon Bank lending behaviour and macroeconomic factors : A study from strategic interaction perspective. Heliyon, 8(August), e11906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11906
Ramlan, H., & Adnan, M. S. (2016). The Profitability of Islamic and Conventional Bank: Case Study in Malaysia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 359–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00044-7
Shahmi, M. A., & Aimon, H. (2020). The Intervention of Macroeconomic Variables on Monetary Stability in Indonesia : Error – Correction Model Approach. Proceedings of the 4th Padang International Conference on Education, Economics, Business and Accounting (PICEEBA-2 2019), 124, 244–248.
Tho’in, M. (2019). Profitability of Islamic Commercial Banks in Indonesia. Management and Economic Journal, 3(3), 277–288. http://dx.doi.org
Trad, N., Trabelsi, M. A., & Goux, J. F. (2017). Risk and profitability of Islamic banks: A religious deception or an alternative solution? European Research on Management and Business Economics, 23(1), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2016.09.001
Trinugroho, I., Risfandy, T., & Ariefianto, M. D. (2018). Competition, diversification, and bank margins: Evidence from Indonesian Islamic rural banks. Borsa Istanbul Review, 18(4), 349–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2018.07.006
Wang, L. (2023). Central bank asset purchases, banks’ risky security holdings and profitability: Macro and micro evidence from Japan and the U.S. International Review of Economics & Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.04.022
Yanikkaya, H., Gumus, N., & Pabuccu, Y. U. (2018). How profitability differs between conventional and Islamic banks: A dynamic panel data approach. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 48(July 2017), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2018.01.006
Yuliana, adah, & Bashir, A. (2017). International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues Comparative Analysis of Profit Sharing Financing Between Islamic Banks (BUS) and Islamic Rural Bank (BPRS) in Indonesia. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(2), 266–270.
Zuwardi, Padli, H., & Shahmi, M. A. (2019). Analisis Pengaruh Dana Pihak Ketiga (DPK), Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), dan Non Performing Financing (NPF) Terhadap Pembiayaan (Studi Pada BUS dan UUS di Indonesia Periode 2014-2018). Jurnal Imara.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31958/imara.v7i1.9360
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 MOHAMMAD ALIMAN SHAHMI

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
INDEX BY:
Journal Imara distribute under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License