Fungsi Retoris Istifham dalam Surah Al-Mulk: Analisis Balaghah pada Ayat-Ayat Terpilih

Penulis

  • Pandi Hakimi Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh
  • Misnawati Misnawati Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31958/lathaif.v5i1.17115

Kata Kunci:

Adawat al-Istifham, Surah Al-Mulk, Tahdidi, Taqriri, Uslub Balaghah

Abstrak

Istifham is one of the rhetorical styles (uslub balaghah) frequently employed in the Qur`an. Its use does not always indicate a genuine question; rather, it often serves rhetorical purposes such as affirmation, reproach, warning, and denial. This study aims to analyze the forms of adawat al-istifham (interrogative particles) and their rhetorical functions in Surah Al-Mulk. This research employs a qualitative approach using the library research method. The primary data consist of verses containing istifham in Surah Al-Mulk, while the secondary data are derived from classical and contemporary Qur`anic exegeses, books on Arabic rhetoric (balaghah), and relevant scholarly literature. The analysis was conducted through the identification of adawat al-istifham, examination of Qur`anic interpretations, and rhetorical analysis based on the context of each verse. The findings reveal five forms of adawat al-istifham in the selected verses of Surah Al-Mulk, namely hal, alam, hamzah, awalam, and man. These interrogative particles perform four rhetorical functions: taqriri (affirmation) in verses 3 and 19, taubikhi (reproach) in verse 8, tahdidi (warning or threat) in verse 16, and inkari (denial) in verse 30. The study demonstrates that istifham in Surah Al-Mulk is not employed as a genuine inquiry seeking information, but rather as a rhetorical device that reinforces the messages of monotheism, warning, and reflection upon Allah’s power. Therefore, the meaning and function of istifham in the Qur`an are highly influenced by the context of the verse and the communicative purpose intended.

Referensi

Ahmad, B. (2005). Min Balaghah Al-Qur`an. Jami al-Huquq Mahfuzah.

Al-Husaini, A. Q. (1983). Fann Al-Balaghah. Alim al-Kutub.

Al-Qazawayni, J. A.-D. (1993). Al-Idhah fi ‘Ulum Al-Balaghah. Dar al-Jail.

Al Jeremy, A. A., & Mustofa. (1951). Al-Balaghah Al-Wadhihhah. Dar Al-ma’arif.

Alvino, R., & Isman, N. (2023). Uslūb Al-Istifhām Fī Surah Al-An’ām (Dirāsah Tahlīliyyah Balāghiyyah). Mauriduna: Journal of Islamic Studies, 4 (1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.37274/mauriduna.v4i1.726

Anwar, H., Putri, R. A., Zahrah, I. H., Cahyo, N. A., Nabilah, H., & F, M. A. K. (2025). Analisis Tarjamah Uslub Istifham Dalam Hadis Muslim: Relevansinya Terhadap Nilai-Nilai Ilmu Sosial Islam. Tadris: AL-Arabiyat: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 5 (2), 232–247. https://ejournal.iaida.ac.id/index.php/arabiyat/article/view/3885

Hamidah, A., & Iman, M. D. (2025). A Semantic Analysis of Interrogative Particles ( Istifham ) in Juz 20 of the Qur ’ an. El-Ibtikar: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 14 (2), 276–285.

Hashimi, S. A. (1994). Jawahir Al-Balaghah. Dar al-Fikr.

Hawary, M. S. R., Banjarnaor, R., Ridwan, M., Syah, M. A. F. R., & Agustiar, A. (2025). Exploring the Unique Stylistics and Divine Rhetoric of the Qur`an: Unveiling the Linguistic Miracle of Revelation. Al-Irfan : Journal of Arabic Literature and Islamic Studies, 8 (1), 409–427. https://doi.org/10.58223/al-irfan.v8i1.405

Ismirah, N. N., Zuhriah, & Ridwan, M. (2025). Asalib Istifham dalam Al-Quran Al-Karim Juz 11-12 (Dirasah Tahliliyah Balaghiyyah). Jurnal Sarjana Ilmu Budaya, 05 (01), 58–75.

Katsir, I. (2004). Tafsir Ibnu Katsir. Pustaka Imam Asy-Syafi’i.

Lisana, N., Busri, H., & Irawati, R. P. (2021). Kata Tanya (Istifham ) Dalam Al-Qur`an Juz 20 (Analisis Semantik). Journal of Arabic Learning and Teaching, 10 (1), 15–22. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/laa

Mabruroh, H., Yasmin, A. Z., Ardya, N. S., & Athiroh, Z. (2025). Analisis Macam-Macam Istifham dan Maknanya dalam Surat Al-Baqarah Ayat 1-75 (Studi Analisis Balaghah). Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Bahasa, 4 (3), 145–153. https://prin.or.id/index.php/JURRIBAH/article/view/6573

Mandhur, I. (1996). Lisan Al-‘Arab. Dar Ihya Al-Turath Al-‘Arabi.

Muhsin, W., & Wahab, F. (1983). Pokok-Pokok Ilmu Balaghah. Angkasa.

Mulyadin, A. (2025). Makna Kata Tanya Pada As-Sab’u Ath-Thiwal dalam Alquran. Jurnal Syntax Imperatif: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan, 6 (4), 1037–1045. https://doi.org/10.54543/syntaximperatif.v6i4.815

Nur, R., Ghalib, M. M., Ghany, A., & Arwin, M. (2025). Istifhām in the Phrase Mā Khaṭbu in the Qur ’ an. Al-Fahmu: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur`an Dan Tafsir, 4 (2), 456–469.

Rahim, I. A., & Zulkepli, M. K. A. (2025). a Review of Quranic Rhetoric Studies: Techniques and Linguistic Features. International Journal of Modern Education, 7 (26), 657–674. https://doi.org/10.35631/ijmoe.726044

Rif’ah, L. (2026). Pendekatan Qawa’id Al-Tafsir Terhadap Pola Soal dan Jawab dalam Al-Quran. Al-Muhith ( Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur`an Dan Hadits, 5 (1), 204–218.

Shihab, M. Q. (2002). Tafsir Al-Misbah: Pesan, Kesan dan Keserasian Al-Qur`an. Lentera Hati.

Siregar, I., Diva, R., Nasution, T., & Hasibuan, M. R. (2025). Kalam Insya’ Talabi dalam Surah Al-Alaq: “Kajian Balaghah Terhadap Tuntutan Implisit.” Tafaqquh: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kajian Keislaman, 13 (2), 324–342.

Tahir, N. S. (2022). خطاباتِ الٰہیہ کے فصاحتی اور بلاغتی پہلوEloquent and Rhetorical Aspects of Divine Addresses. Al-Qamar, 5 (1), 213–222.

##submission.downloads##

Diterbitkan

2026-06-30