Increasing Student Argumentative Speech through Basic Debate Training
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31958/marawa.v3i1.12316Abstract
This article aims to show the impact of basic debate training on their ability to perform argumentative speech. This training was conducted at SMAN 3 Batusangkar with 14 participants. The training used the Asian Parliamentary Debate System because it is the most widely used debate system in high school. After the training was conducted four times, it was found that their abilities improved both in terms of the quality of their public speaking, their intelligence in arguing, and their confidence. It is hoped that after this debate training, students will be able to compete well in the world of debate.
References
Anggraini, T., & Marlina, L. (2014). The Implementation of RTDA (Read to Debate Activity) in Motivating Senior High School Students to Speak English. Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(2), 137–150. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/jelt/article/view/3717
Asif, S., Ain, N. U., & Siddiqua, A. (2023). Traditional versus Social Media News Coverage: An Analysis of the Topic Selection Priorities. Global Social Sciences Review, VIII. humapub.com. Retrieved from https://www.humapub.com/admin/alljournals/gssr/papers/fnnp0HsFRu.pdf
Asra, S., Saputra, N., Isda, I. D., Fadlia, F., & Diani, W. R. (2023). L1 in L2: Indonesian towards English in Public Speaking Class. English Teaching and Linguistics Journal (ETLiJ), 4(1), 10–16. Retrieved from https://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/ETLiJ/article/view/12953
Calista, C. (2019). The Implementation of Arel in Argument on Asian Parliamentary Debate System at English Debate Club of SMK PGRI 2 Kediri. simki.unpkediri.ac.id. Retrieved from http://simki.unpkediri.ac.id/detail/14.1.01.08.0130
Chaira, S. (2020). Strategi Guru Dalam Meningkatkan Self-Efficacy Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris Melalui Asian Parliamentary Debate. In PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL PENDIDIKAN AKSELERASI PEMBELAJARAN DI MASA PANDEMIC. STKIP Bina Bangsa Getsempena. repository.bbg.ac.id. Retrieved from https://repository.bbg.ac.id/handle/916
Dunn, M. W., & Pogrund, R. (2020). The ARGUE Mnemonic: A Strategy to Improve Argumentative Essay Writing with Students who have Visual Impairments. The Canadian Journal of Action Research, 21(2), 91–108. Retrieved from https://journals.nipissingu.ca/index.php/cjar/article/view/512
Gyetvai, L., Lovas, B. V, Kiss, M., & Talas, M. (2022). Development of a Negotiation-based Serious Game in Virtual Reality to Help Teach Responsible Consumption and Production. In 2022 1st IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Aspects of Virtual Reality (CVR) (pp. 21–26). ieeexplore.ieee.org. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9967488/
Hidayati, W., Saun, S., & Fitrawati, F. (2013). Using the Asia Parliamentary Debate in writing a Hortatory Exposition Text of Grade XI Students at Diniyyah Puteri Padang Panjang. Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(1), 388–399. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/jelt/article/view/2627
Hidayoza, P., Amri, Z., & Wahyuni, D. (2019). Level of Public Speaking Anxiety and Coping Strategy Used by English Debaters at Unit Kegiatan Bahasa Asing in Dealing with English Debate. Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(1), 51–60. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/jelt/article/view/103271
Kristanti, M., & Basuni, M. (2021). Modified Asian Parliamentary Debate Impact On Students’english Speaking Ability And Critical Thinking. In Proceeding of Conference on English Language Teaching, Applied Linguistics, and Literature (pp. 77–82). prosiding.iainponorogo.ac.id. Retrieved from https://prosiding.iainponorogo.ac.id/index.php/celtall/article/view/528
Putri, D. R. (2021). An analysis of students’ argumentative essay writing skill of third semester of english language education-UIR. repository.uir.ac.id. Retrieved from http://repository.uir.ac.id/id/eprint/12810
Qin, J. (2013). Applying Toulmin model in teaching L2 argumentative writing. The Journal of Language Learning and Teaching. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jltl/issue/22505/240598
Rasyid, A., & Namrullah, Z. (2021). Asian Parliamentary Debate Simulation in EFL Classroom. ASELS_2021. Retrieved from https://amcapress.amca2012.org/index.php/asels2021/article/view/5
Sanjaya, R., Nurweni, A., & Hasan, H. (2014). The Implementation of Asian-parliamentary Debate in Teaching Speaking at Senior High School. U-JET. core.ac.uk. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/291530248.pdf
Siregar, R. N., Syarif, H., & Amri, Z. (2021). An analysis of argument of students’ argumentative essay by using Toulmin Model. Eighth International Conference on …. Retrieved from https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icoelt-8-20/125960876
Solihati, S., & Narius, D. (2016). Teaching Speaking by Using Australia–Asia Debate Strategy at Senior High School. Journal of English Language Teaching. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/jelt/article/view/7329
Teich, N. (1987). Rogerian problem-solving and the rhetoric of argumentation. Journal of Advanced Composition. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/20865615
Tigris, S. L. (2021). Speech Acts and Argumentative Resources in the Speeches Given in Front of the European Parliament by King Juan Carlos I and by King Felipe VI. Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences. Retrieved from https://dpublication.com/journal/JARSS/article/view/639
Turmudi, D. (2020). Investigating The Indonesian Efl Students’argument In Argumentative Essay. Premise: Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 251–276. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/dedi-turmudi/publication/345101440_investigating_the_indonesian_efl_studentsa_argument_in_argumentative_essay/links/5f9db417458515b7cfad85a3/investigating-the-indonesian-efl-studentsa-argument-in-argumentative-essay.pdf
Volkova, I. S., Mishlanov, V. A., & Salimovskii, V. A. (2019). Argumentative speech in mass media interactive communication. dspace.spbu.ru. Retrieved from https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/16714/1/164-179.pdf
White, F., & Billings, S. (2013). The Well-Crafted Argument. scholarcommons.scu.edu. Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/faculty_books/120/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Suswati Hendriani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with?áMARAWA:?áJurnal Masyarakat Religius dan Berwawasan?áagree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a?áCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License?á(CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See?áThe Effect of Open Access).









