Transformasi dan Fragmentasi Gerakan Islam Indonesia Pasca Pemilu 2024
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31958/pi.v5i1.16772Kata Kunci:
Gerakan Islam, Struktur Peluang Politik, Fragmentasi dan Transformasi , Pemilu 2024Abstrak
Artikel ini menyelidiki transformasi dan fragmentasi gerakan Islam di Indonesia pasca Pemilu 2024. Meskipun studi yang ada sebagian besar berfokus pada puncak mobilisasi Islamis selama 2016–2019, terutama gerakan 212, perhatian akademis terhadap perkembangan di periode pasca-2024 masih terbatas. Menggunakan metodologi kualitatif dengan desain studi kasus kolektif, penelitian ini mengacu pada dokumen organisasi, liputan media, materi digital, dan sumber sekunder yang mencakup periode 2014–2025. Kerangka analitis menggabungkan Struktur Peluang Politik, Teori Mobilisasi Sumber Daya, Teori Pembingkaian, Institusionalisasi, dan Pasca-Islamisme. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa gerakan Islam setelah 2024 tidak mengalami penurunan secara langsung; sebaliknya, mereka menunjukkan proses transformasi struktural dan fragmentasi internal. Konsolidasi elit politik nasional dan penyempitan ruang politik oposisi telah secara signifikan mengurangi mobilisasi berbasis identitas skala besar. Sebagai tanggapan, aktor-aktor gerakan telah menyesuaikan kembali strategi mereka, beralih dari demonstrasi jalanan yang konfrontatif menuju bentuk-bentuk keterlibatan yang lebih pragmatis, termasuk aktivisme digital, advokasi yang berorientasi pada kebijakan, dan integrasi selektif ke dalam partai politik dan lembaga negara. Selain itu, pembingkaian isu telah bergeser dari identitas agama dan keluhan moral ke keprihatinan sosial-ekonomi, tata kelola, dan moralitas publik yang lebih luas. Studi ini berpendapat bahwa periode pasca-2024 mewakili konfigurasi ulang yang lebih luas dari aktivisme Islam dalam demokrasi elektoral Indonesia yang semakin terkonsolidasi. Alih-alih menghilang, gerakan-gerakan Islam telah melakukan diversifikasi secara adaptif, menandai transisi menuju lingkungan pasca-polarisasi yang lebih pragmatis dan terdiferensiasi secara internal.
Referensi
Aspinall, E., & Mietzner, M. (2019). Democracy in Indonesia: From stagnation to regression? ISEAS Publishing.
Bayat, A. (2007). Making Islam democratic: Social movements and the post-Islamist turn. Stanford University Press.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Bush, R. (2009). Nahdlatul Ulama and the struggle for power within Islam and politics in Indonesia. ISEAS Publishing.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (2006). Social movements: An introduction (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishing.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Hadiz, V. R. (2016). Islamic populism in Indonesia and the Middle East. Cambridge University Press.
Hefner, R. W. (2018). Islam and institutional religious freedom in Indonesia. Studia Islamika, 25(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v25i1.6755
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
McAdam, D. (1996). Conceptual origins, current problems, future directions. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings (pp. 23–40). Cambridge University Press.
McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212–1241. https://doi.org/10.1086/226464
Mietzner, M. (2013). Money, power, and ideology: Political parties in post-authoritarian Indonesia. NUS Press.
Mietzner, M., & Muhtadi, B. (2018). Explaining the 2016 Islamist mobilisation in Indonesia: Religious intolerance, militant groups and the politics of accommodation. Asian Studies Review, 42(3), 479–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2018.1473335
Muhtadi, B. (2019). Populisme Islam dan dinamika elektoral Indonesia 2019. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 16(2), 123–140.
Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197–217.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications.
Tarrow, S. (2011). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Wiktorowicz, Q. (2004). Islamic activism: A social movement theory approach. Indiana University Press.
Yavuz, M. H. (2003). Islamic political identity in Turkey. Oxford University Press.
Zed, M. (2014). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
##submission.downloads##
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Kharisma Firdaus, Muhammad Mukhobbir Risalah, S.Sos., M.IP., Dr. Hj. Arzeti Bilbina Setyawan, S.E., M.A.P.
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a?áCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License?á(CC BY-NC 4.0)?áthat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See?áThe Effect of Open Access).
