Multi-Platform Strategies of Populis Figur in West Sumatra
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31958/semantik.v3i1.15725Keywords:
Affective Publics, Digital Morality, Islamic Populism, , Symbolic Convergence, West SumatraAbstract
This article explores the digital strategies of Islamic populism in West Sumatra by examining how key figures such as Fauzi Bahar and Jel Fathullah systematically leverage social media platforms to disseminate moral discourses grounded in the local religious-philosophical paradigm of Adat Basandi SyaraÔÇÖ, SyaraÔÇÖ Basandi Kitabullah (ABS-SBK). Drawing on a descriptive qualitative approach through digital observation, the study reveals a multi-platform orchestration in which Facebook functions as a site for constructing long-form religious narratives and symbolic continuity, while Instagram Reels and TikTok are deployed for affective mobilization through short, emotionally charged content featuring themes such as hijrah, almsgiving, and Islamic virtue. The interplay of symbolic messaging and technical affordances across platforms illustrates what scholars have termed symbolic convergenceÔÇöa synchronization of religious rhetoric with platform-specific features to consolidate affective publics. The analysis demonstrates how figures like Jel Fathullah transform short-form visual content into emotional gateways that channel followers toward deeper ideological engagements via Facebook Live or digital sermons. User engagement through likes, shares, and comments is interpreted by followers as a form of "digital charity," signaling a shift in the mediation of moral authority from religious institutions to platform architectures and algorithms. This study argues that Islamic digital populism in West Sumatra constitutes a form of vernacular, platformized politics wherein local identity, digital aesthetics, and moral claims coalesce. It advances the understanding of how emotional resonance, identity performance, and religious legitimacy are orchestrated through hybrid media systems.
References
Brubaker, R. (2017). Why populism?. Theory and society, 46, 357-385. https://doi.org/10.22515/albalagh.v7i2.5643
Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2018). The affordances of social media platforms. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T. Poell (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Media (pp. 233–253). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473984066.n14
Campbell, H. A., & Evolvi, G. (2020). Contextualizing current digital religion research on emerging technologies. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.149
Chadwick, A. (2013). The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759477.001.0001
De la Torre, C. (Ed.). (2019). Routledge handbook of global populism (p. 1). London: Routledge.
Franzia, E. (2017). Cultural Wisdom of Minangkabau Ethnic Community for Local–Global Virtual Identity. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 325–332. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2017.v8n1p325 jati.um.edu.my+9richtmann.org+9researchgate.net+9.
Febrian, H. (2024). Visualizing Authority: Rise of the Religious Influencers on the Instagram. Social Media+ Society, 10(4), 20563051241286850.
Furedi, F. (2018). How Fear Works: Culture of Fear in the Twenty-First Century. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Gerbaudo, P. (2017). The Digital Party: Political Organisation and Online Democracy. Pluto Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1zrvhbz
Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. Yale University Press.
Hadiz, V.R. and Robison, R. (2017). “Competing Populisms in Post-authoritarian Indonesia.” International Political Science Review, 38:4, 488-502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512117697475
Heryanto, G. G. (2015). Konvergensi simbolik di media online: studi perbicangan netizens tentang polemik kasus century di era pemerintahan SBY-Boediono.
Hew, W. W. (2018). The Art of Dakwah: Social Media, Visual Persuasion and the Islamist Propagation of Felix Siauw. Indonesia and the Malay World, 46(134), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2018.141675
Husein, F., & Slama, M. (2018). Online Piety and its Discontents: Facebook as an alternative public sphere in Indonesia. Indonesia and the Malay World, 46(134), 61–79.
Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. Verso.
Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Oktavianus, O. (2023). Minangkabau Language as Ethnic Identity in the Digital Era. Humanis, 27(3), 248–257. https://doi.org/10.24843/JH.2023.v27.i03.p01
Papacharissi, Z. (2014). Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199999736.001.0001
Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics and structures of storytelling: Sentiment, events and mediality. Information, Communication & Society, 19(3), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1109697
Solahudin, D., & Fakhruroji, M. (2020). Internet and islamic learning practices in Indonesia: Social media, religious populism, and religious authority. Religions, 11 (1), 1–12
Yilmaz, I., & Morieson, N. (2021). A systematic literature review of populism, religion and emotions. Religions, 12(4), 272.
Yilmaz, I., & Morieson, N. (2022). Civilizational populism: Definition, literature, theory, and practice. Religions, 13(11), 1026.
Yilmaz, I., Morieson, N., & Bachtiar, H. (2022). Civilizational Populism in Indonesia: The Case of Front Pembela Islam (FPI). Religions, 13(12), 1208.
Yılmaz, İ., & Morieson, N. (Eds.). (2023). Religions and the Global Rise of Civilizational Populism. Palgrave Macmillan
Yilmaz, I. (2023). The nexus of digital authoritarianism and religious populism. Religions, 14(6), 747.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yayuk Lestari, Diego, Vannyora Okditazeini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under?áa Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License?áthat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
