Culturally Responsive Community-Based Inquiry to Enhance Basic Scientific Literacy in Indigenous Papua Border Elementary Schools

Authors

  • Aisyah Ali Universitas Cenderawasih, Indonesia
  • Akhmad Kadir Universitas Cenderawasih
  • Ria Ristiani Universitas Cenderawasih

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v28i2.15908

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of a community-based, culturally responsive science learning model in improving basic scientific literacy among elementary students in the Indonesia–Papua New Guinea border region. The research addresses the persistent problem of low scientific literacy, which is largely caused by instructional practices that overlook the ecological and cultural contexts of Indigenous Papuan communities. Using a one-group pretest–posttest design, the study involved 89 students from three Indigenous community schools. A culturally adapted 12-item instrument was employed to assess five dimensions of scientific literacy: conceptual knowledge, scientific processes, scientific ethics, attitudes toward science, and scientific behaviors. Data were analyzed using Shapiro–Wilk tests, paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, N-Gain scores, and effect sizes. Results demonstrated statistically significant improvements across all dimensions (p < 0.001). N-Gain values ranged from 0.31 to 0.36, indicating moderate learning gains, while effect sizes fell within the small-to-moderate range. These findings show that integrating local ecological practices—particularly through sago-based inquiry activities—and involving Indigenous community members meaningfully enhanced students’ engagement, conceptual understanding, and reflective scientific behaviors. The study concludes that a culturally grounded community-based instructional approach contributes to more equitable, contextually relevant, and sustainable science education in Indigenous and borderland school settings.

References

AAAS, A. A. for the A. of S. (1989). Science for all Americans. Oxford University Press.

Aberšek, M. K., Dolenc, K., Flogie, A., & Koritnik, A. (2015). New natural science literacies of online research and comprehension: To teach or not to teach. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(4), 460–473. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/15.14.460

Ali, A., & Kulimbang, E. (2025). Efektivitas Bahan Ajar Tematik Terintegrasi Kearifan Lokal Khombow Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Selolah Dasar di Kecamatan Sentani Timur Kabupaten Jayapura. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(01), 370–387.

Anderson, E. (2024). Local Knowledge in Institutional Epistemology1. Australasian Philosophical Review, 1–23.

Ballard, H. L., Calabrese Barton, A., & Upadhyay, B. (2023). Community-driven science and science education: Living in and navigating the edges of equity, justice, and science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(8), 1613–1626. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21880

Bang, M., & Medin, D. (2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94(6), 1008–1026.

Bang, M., Warren, B., Rosebery, A. S., & Medin, D. (2013). Desettling expectations in science education. Human Development, 55(5–6), 302–318.

Bauer, M. W. (2015). Science literacy and beyond. In Public understanding of science (Vol. 24, Issue 3, pp. 258–259). SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England.

Bektiarso, S., Walukow, A. F., Narulita, E., & Ali, A. (2024). Khombouw in Science Learning: Development of Teaching Materials based on Local Wisdom Guided Inquiry Model to Improve Students’ Interpersonal Skills. Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education, 5(4), 669–686.

Børsen, T., Serreau, Y., Reifschneider, K., Baier, A., Pinkelman, R., Smetanina, T., & Zandvoort, H. (2021). Initiatives, experiences and best practices for teaching social and ecological responsibility in ethics education for science and engineering students. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(2), 186–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1701632

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research methods in education. routledge.

Collet-Sabé, J., & Ball, S. J. (2023). Beyond School. The challenge of co-producing and commoning a different episteme for education. Journal of Education Policy, 38(6), 895–910. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2022.2157890

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research designs. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.

Fetters, M. D., & Tajima, C. (2022). Joint Displays of Integrated Data Collection in Mixed Methods Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221104564

Freire, P. (1970). The adult literacy process as cultural action for freedom. Harvard Educational Review, 40(2), 205–225.

Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. teachers college press.

Gumbo, M. T., Nnadi, F. O., & Anamezie, R. C. (2021). Amalgamating western science and african indigenous knowledge systems in the measurement of gravitational acceleration. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(5), 729–739. https://doi.org/10.33225/JBSE/21.20.729

Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores. AREA-D. American Education.

Idrus, F., & Sohid, M. (2023). Teachers’ Expectations and Challenges in Using Culturally Responsive Teaching (CRT) Strategies in the ESL Classroom. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(3), 629–635. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1403.10

Johnson, A. P. (2022). Culturally responsive teaching in higher education. The International Journal of Equity and Social Justice in Higher Education, 1(1), 9.

Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press.

Kumblathan, T., Borg, G. C., Morrissette, C., Clark, W. I., Le, X. C., & Li, X.-F. (2025). Advancing equity and empowering science students from indigenous communities. Analytical Chemistry, 97(2), 1041–1046.

Medina-Jerez, W. (2008). Between local culture and school science: The case of provincial and urban students from Eastern Colombia. Research in Science Education, 38(2), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9044-y

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. 3rd. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Miller, H. T., & Fox, C. J. (2001). The epistemic community. Administration and Society, 32(6), 668–685. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953990122019613

Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (2006). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. In Funds of knowledge (pp. 71–87). Routledge.

Mumba, F., Chabalengula, V. M., & Hunter, W. (2006). A Quantitative Analysis Of Zambian High School Physics Textbooks, Syllabus And Examinations For Scientific Literacy Themes. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 10.

Ningrum, E. (2016). Learning Model Based on Local Wisdom to Embed the Ethics Land for Students. https://doi.org/10.2991/icse-15.2016.88

Nugraha, A. E., Wibowo, D., & Hendrawan, B. (2024). Paulo Freire’s Critical Pedagogy Analysis Of Educational Transformation. MSJ : Majority Science Journal, 2(2), 220–228. https://doi.org/10.61942/msj.v2i2.157

Opoku, M. J., & James, A. (2021). Pedagogical model for decolonising, indigenising and transforming science education curricula: A case of south africa. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(1), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.93

Osborne, J., & Allchin, D. (2024). Science literacy in the twenty-first century: informed trust and the competent outsider. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2331980

Ramos, S. C. (2022). Understanding Yurok traditional ecological knowledge and wildlife management. Journal of Wildlife Management, 86(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22140

Sharifian, A., Fernández-Llamazares, Á., Wario, H. T., Molnár, Z., & Cabeza, M. (2022). Dynamics of pastoral traditional ecological knowledge: a global state-of-the-art review. Ecology and Society, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12918-270114

Sotero, M. C., Alves, Â. G. C., Arandas, J. K. G., & Medeiros, M. F. T. (2020). Local and scientific knowledge in the school context: Characterization and content of published works. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-020-00373-5

UNESCO. (2020). Education for sustainable development: a roadmap. Education for Sustainable Development: A Roadmap. https://doi.org/10.54675/yfre1448

Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.

You. (2023). WVI sebut hanya 36,1 persen siswa kelas 3 SD di Papua memiliki keterampilan literasi. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/may/09/india-accuses-pakistan-drones-attack-cities-bases

Downloads

Published

2025-12-11

How to Cite

Ali, A., Kadir , A., & Ristiani , R. (2025). Culturally Responsive Community-Based Inquiry to Enhance Basic Scientific Literacy in Indigenous Papua Border Elementary Schools. Ta’dib, 28(2), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v28i2.15908

Issue

Section

Artikel