Culturally Responsive Community-Based Inquiry to Enhance Basic Scientific Literacy in Indigenous Papua Border Elementary Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v28i2.15908Abstract
This study investigates the effectiveness of a community-based, culturally responsive science learning model in improving basic scientific literacy among elementary students in the Indonesia–Papua New Guinea border region. The research addresses the persistent problem of low scientific literacy, which is largely caused by instructional practices that overlook the ecological and cultural contexts of Indigenous Papuan communities. Using a one-group pretest–posttest design, the study involved 89 students from three Indigenous community schools. A culturally adapted 12-item instrument was employed to assess five dimensions of scientific literacy: conceptual knowledge, scientific processes, scientific ethics, attitudes toward science, and scientific behaviors. Data were analyzed using Shapiro–Wilk tests, paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, N-Gain scores, and effect sizes. Results demonstrated statistically significant improvements across all dimensions (p < 0.001). N-Gain values ranged from 0.31 to 0.36, indicating moderate learning gains, while effect sizes fell within the small-to-moderate range. These findings show that integrating local ecological practices—particularly through sago-based inquiry activities—and involving Indigenous community members meaningfully enhanced students’ engagement, conceptual understanding, and reflective scientific behaviors. The study concludes that a culturally grounded community-based instructional approach contributes to more equitable, contextually relevant, and sustainable science education in Indigenous and borderland school settings.
References
AAAS, A. A. for the A. of S. (1989). Science for all Americans. Oxford University Press.
Aberšek, M. K., Dolenc, K., Flogie, A., & Koritnik, A. (2015). New natural science literacies of online research and comprehension: To teach or not to teach. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(4), 460–473. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/15.14.460
Ali, A., & Kulimbang, E. (2025). Efektivitas Bahan Ajar Tematik Terintegrasi Kearifan Lokal Khombow Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Selolah Dasar di Kecamatan Sentani Timur Kabupaten Jayapura. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(01), 370–387.
Anderson, E. (2024). Local Knowledge in Institutional Epistemology1. Australasian Philosophical Review, 1–23.
Ballard, H. L., Calabrese Barton, A., & Upadhyay, B. (2023). Community-driven science and science education: Living in and navigating the edges of equity, justice, and science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(8), 1613–1626. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21880
Bang, M., & Medin, D. (2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94(6), 1008–1026.
Bang, M., Warren, B., Rosebery, A. S., & Medin, D. (2013). Desettling expectations in science education. Human Development, 55(5–6), 302–318.
Bauer, M. W. (2015). Science literacy and beyond. In Public understanding of science (Vol. 24, Issue 3, pp. 258–259). SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England.
Bektiarso, S., Walukow, A. F., Narulita, E., & Ali, A. (2024). Khombouw in Science Learning: Development of Teaching Materials based on Local Wisdom Guided Inquiry Model to Improve Students’ Interpersonal Skills. Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education, 5(4), 669–686.
Børsen, T., Serreau, Y., Reifschneider, K., Baier, A., Pinkelman, R., Smetanina, T., & Zandvoort, H. (2021). Initiatives, experiences and best practices for teaching social and ecological responsibility in ethics education for science and engineering students. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(2), 186–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1701632
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research methods in education. routledge.
Collet-Sabé, J., & Ball, S. J. (2023). Beyond School. The challenge of co-producing and commoning a different episteme for education. Journal of Education Policy, 38(6), 895–910. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2022.2157890
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research designs. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.
Fetters, M. D., & Tajima, C. (2022). Joint Displays of Integrated Data Collection in Mixed Methods Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221104564
Freire, P. (1970). The adult literacy process as cultural action for freedom. Harvard Educational Review, 40(2), 205–225.
Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. teachers college press.
Gumbo, M. T., Nnadi, F. O., & Anamezie, R. C. (2021). Amalgamating western science and african indigenous knowledge systems in the measurement of gravitational acceleration. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(5), 729–739. https://doi.org/10.33225/JBSE/21.20.729
Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores. AREA-D. American Education.
Idrus, F., & Sohid, M. (2023). Teachers’ Expectations and Challenges in Using Culturally Responsive Teaching (CRT) Strategies in the ESL Classroom. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(3), 629–635. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1403.10
Johnson, A. P. (2022). Culturally responsive teaching in higher education. The International Journal of Equity and Social Justice in Higher Education, 1(1), 9.
Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press.
Kumblathan, T., Borg, G. C., Morrissette, C., Clark, W. I., Le, X. C., & Li, X.-F. (2025). Advancing equity and empowering science students from indigenous communities. Analytical Chemistry, 97(2), 1041–1046.
Medina-Jerez, W. (2008). Between local culture and school science: The case of provincial and urban students from Eastern Colombia. Research in Science Education, 38(2), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9044-y
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. 3rd. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Miller, H. T., & Fox, C. J. (2001). The epistemic community. Administration and Society, 32(6), 668–685. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953990122019613
Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (2006). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. In Funds of knowledge (pp. 71–87). Routledge.
Mumba, F., Chabalengula, V. M., & Hunter, W. (2006). A Quantitative Analysis Of Zambian High School Physics Textbooks, Syllabus And Examinations For Scientific Literacy Themes. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 10.
Ningrum, E. (2016). Learning Model Based on Local Wisdom to Embed the Ethics Land for Students. https://doi.org/10.2991/icse-15.2016.88
Nugraha, A. E., Wibowo, D., & Hendrawan, B. (2024). Paulo Freire’s Critical Pedagogy Analysis Of Educational Transformation. MSJ : Majority Science Journal, 2(2), 220–228. https://doi.org/10.61942/msj.v2i2.157
Opoku, M. J., & James, A. (2021). Pedagogical model for decolonising, indigenising and transforming science education curricula: A case of south africa. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(1), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.93
Osborne, J., & Allchin, D. (2024). Science literacy in the twenty-first century: informed trust and the competent outsider. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2331980
Ramos, S. C. (2022). Understanding Yurok traditional ecological knowledge and wildlife management. Journal of Wildlife Management, 86(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22140
Sharifian, A., Fernández-Llamazares, Á., Wario, H. T., Molnár, Z., & Cabeza, M. (2022). Dynamics of pastoral traditional ecological knowledge: a global state-of-the-art review. Ecology and Society, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12918-270114
Sotero, M. C., Alves, Â. G. C., Arandas, J. K. G., & Medeiros, M. F. T. (2020). Local and scientific knowledge in the school context: Characterization and content of published works. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-020-00373-5
UNESCO. (2020). Education for sustainable development: a roadmap. Education for Sustainable Development: A Roadmap. https://doi.org/10.54675/yfre1448
Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
You. (2023). WVI sebut hanya 36,1 persen siswa kelas 3 SD di Papua memiliki keterampilan literasi. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/may/09/india-accuses-pakistan-drones-attack-cities-bases
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aisyah Ali, Akhmad Kadir, Ria Ristiani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a?áCreative Commons Attribution License?á(CC-BY-NC)?áthat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.







