A STUDY OF STUDENTSÔÇÖ PLANNING OF METACOGNITIVE STRATEGIES IN LISTENING COMPREHENSION

Authors

  • ELFI ELFI Jurusan Tadris Bahasa Inggris IAIN Batusangkar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v17i1.260

Abstract

The students have a problem in comprehending the text in listening comprehension. It was prompted by the idea that metacognitive stratetegies is the crucial important to solve the problem in listening comprehension. By using these strategies, it helped students to plan, monitor, solve, and evaluate their learning to foster their listening comprehension. One of strategy in metacognitive is planning strategies.  This article is intendedto find out what planning  of metacognitive strategies used by students and  the way they apply it in listening comprehension.Based on the research has conducted by the researcher, The students had applied metacognitive strategies but some of them did not do it in the correct ways in listening comprehension.  It can be concluded that the result of the study indicated that the planning of metacognitive strategies used by the students in listening comprehension need to be develop and increase in to the correct ways to get better comprehension in listening.

Key words:    metacognitive strategies, planning strategies, listening comprehension.

References

Alwasilah, A. Chaidar. 2009. Filsafat Bahasa dan Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Bara, Bruno G. 2010. Cognitive pragmatics. Cambride: Library of Congress.

Barnadib, Imam.1994. Hand Out Filsafat Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: PPs UGM

Chapman, Siobhan & Routledge, Christopher (Eds). 2009. Key Ideas in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hidayat, Asep Ahmad. 2009. Filsafat Bahasa. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya

Kaelan M.S. 2002. Filsafat Bahasa Masalah dan Perkembangannya. Yogyakarta: Paradigma

Leech, Geoffrey. 1993. Prinsip-Prinsip Pragmatik. Diterjemahkan oleh M.D.D. Oka. Jakarta: Indonesia University Press

Nababan, P.W.J. 1987. Ilmu Pragmatik (Teori dan Penerapannya). Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Noddings, Nel (Lee L. Jacks). 1998. Philosophy of Education.Colorado: Westview Press.

Patzam, Julizar. 2011. Pragmatik Bahasa Indonesia, (Online), http://jpzx1. blogspot.com/2011/01/pragmatik-bahasa-indonesia.html. diakses 7 Januari 2013.

Subuki, Makyun. 2006. Mengapa Pragmatik Perlu Dipelajari dalam Program Studi Linguistik?, (Online), http://www.scribd.com/doc/14548085/pragmatik. diakses 7 Januari 2013.

Surajiyo. 2005. Ilmu Filsafat Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Suyitno, Y. 2009.Landasan Filosofis Pendidikan.Bandung: FP UPI

Titus, Harold H. dkk. 1984. Persoalan-persoalan Filsafat. Diterjemahkan oleh H.M. Rasyidi. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.

Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatik. Diterjemahkan oleh Indah Fajar W dan Rombe Mustajab. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Published

2016-10-17

How to Cite

ELFI, E. (2016). A STUDY OF STUDENTSÔÇÖ PLANNING OF METACOGNITIVE STRATEGIES IN LISTENING COMPREHENSION. Ta’dib, 17(1), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v17i1.260

Issue

Section

Artikel