PEMAHAMAN PENDIDIK TENTANG HAKEKAT KEMANUSIAAN DAN APLIKASINYA DALAM LINGKUNGAN PSIKOLOGIS DALAM PROSES PEMBELAJARAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v18i2.283Abstract
This research generally aims to get brief description of teachersÔÇÖ understanding aboutnstudents and its implication in learning process. Specifically, the purpose of this research are to get description about: 1) teachers understanding about students and its defferences among variables, 2) the implementation of high touch unsure in learning process according to teachersÔÇÖ and students and defferences among them, 3) the contribution of teachers, understanding about student toward high touch applied in learning process and, the different response between teachers and students about high touch implementation. This research is conducted by descriptive quantitative method.┬á The population is all teachers and students at senior high school in Padang. Samples are taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The percentage, correlation and t test. The results of this research reveal that: 1) everall, teachers understanding is in middle category, so is with the implementation toward learning process, 2) five observable variables about the nature of man are valid and can be used to explain teachersÔÇÖ understanding about the nature of man as laten variable, and six observable variables about high touch implementation as implication of teachersÔÇÖ understanding about student in learning process. Therefore, teachers understanding about student┬á has positive and significant correlation with implementation┬á of teachersÔÇÖ understanding about nature of man toward learning process trough high touch┬á implementation, and 3) teachersÔÇÖ opinion about high touch implementation as implication of teachersÔÇÖ understanding toward learning process differ significantly with studentsÔÇÖ opinion. In general, teachersÔÇÖ opinion score is higher compared with studentÔÇÖs opinion score.
Kata kunci: Pemahaman dan Persepsi Pendidik, Hakekat Kemanusiaan, Lingkungan Psikologis dalam PembelajaranReferences
Bacon, S. M. (1992). Authentic listening in Spanish: How learners adjust their strategies to the difficulty of the input. Hispania, 75(2), 398-412.
Burns, R. B. (1995). Introduction to Research Methods. Melbourne: Longman Australia Pty Ltd.
Carrier, K. A. (2003). Improving high school English language learners second language listening through strategy instruction. Bilingual Research Journal, 27(3), 383-411.
Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112-130.
Chen, Y. (2007). Learning to learn: the impact of strategy training. ELT Journal, 61(1), 20-29.
Cross, J. (2009). Effect of listening strategy instruction on news videotext comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 13(2), 151-176.
Field, J. (1998). Skills and strategies: towards a new methodology for listening. ELT Journal, 52(2), 110-118.
Field, J. (2000). Not waving but drowning: a reply to Tony Ridgway. ELT Journal, 54(2), 186-195.
Gay, L.R., and Airasian, P. (2000). Educational reseacrh; Competencies for Analysis and Application. six edition. New Jersey: MERRILL
Goh, C., & Taib, Y. (2006). Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners. ELT Journal, 60(3), 222-230.
Goh, C. C. M. (1998). How ESL learners with different listening abilities use comprehension and tactics. Language Teaching Research, 2(2), 124-147.
Liu, X., & C.M.Goh, C. (2006). Improving second language listening: Awareness and involvement. In T. S. C. Farrell (Ed.), Language teacher research in Asia. Alexandria, Virginia: TESOL, Inc.
Moleong, L. J. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
O'Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., & Kuper, L. (1989). Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition Applied Linguistics, 10(4), 418-437.
Oanh, D. T. H. (2006). Learner autonomy in an Asian context: Independent learning and independent work at the university level. In T. S. C. Farrell (Ed.), Language teacher research in Asia. Alexandria, Virginia: TESOL, Inc
Oxford, R., & Crookall, D. (1989). Research on language learning strategies: Methods, findings and instructional issues. The Modern Language Journal, 73(4), 404-419
Ridgway, T. (2000). Listening strategies- I beg your pardon? ELT Journal, 54(2), 179-185.
Rubin, J. (1994). A review of second language listening comprehension research The Modern Language Journal, 78(2), 199-221.
Sheerin, S. (1987). Listening comprehension: teaching or testing? ELT Journal, 41(2), 126.
Syamsudin, & Damajanti, V. S. (2006). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Thompson, I., & Rubin, J. (1996). Can strategy instruction improve listening comprehension? Foreign Language Annals, 29(3), 332-343.
Vandergrift, L. (1999). Facilitating second language listening comprehension: acquiring successful strategies. ELT Journal, 53(3), 168-176.
Vandergrift, L. (2004). Listening to learn or learning to listen? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 3-25.
Vogely, A. (1998). Listening comprehension anxiety: Students' reported sources and solution. Foreign Language Annals, 31(1), 67-80.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Ida Umami
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a?áCreative Commons Attribution License?á(CC-BY-NC)?áthat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
