ENHANCING STUDENTSÔÇÖ LEARNING OUTCOME IN SPORT CLASS THROUGH STUDENT FACILITATOR AND EXPLAINING (SFE) TEACHING MODEL

Authors

  • Aprizal Aprizal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v20i2.609

Keywords:

Learning outcome, Sport Class, Student Facilitator and Explaining teaching model.

Abstract

An ineffective teaching strategy might have some drawbacks such as studentsÔÇÖ passiveness and┬á lack of opportunities to exercise that cause the students difficult to comprehend rythmic gymnastic movement in Sport class. To improve the condition, the researcher conducts a Classroom Action Research (CAR) consisting of four stages; planning, acting, observing, and reflecting, by┬á implementing a Student Facilitator and Explaining (SFE) teaching model which facilitates the students more chance to learn with peers. The subject of the research was the fourth grade of elementary school students of SDN 23 Koto Gadang Hilir Kecamatan Padang Ganting, Tanah Datar regency, academic year 2016/2017. The instruments of the research were both observation sheet and test. Cycle 1 result shows both the test result: 67% of psycomotoric and 71% cognitive aspects were successfully achieved, and┬á the observasion result showing 83% of the teacher SFE activities┬á and 77% students were active. Meanwhile, in Cycle 2, it is found that the studentsÔÇÖ psycomotor was increased to 88% and their cognition 93%. The teacherÔÇÖs SFE activities were improved to 94% and 95% of the students were active. The results indicate that SFE teaching model could enhance the studentsÔÇÖ learning outcome in Sport class particularly on senam irama subject taught at the fourth grade of SDN 23 Koto Gadang Hilir Kecamatan Padang Ganting Tanah Datar regency.

References

Chaker,M.N., and Abdullah, T.A. (2011). What Accountancy Skill are Acquired at College? International Journal Of Business and Social Science.

Gravoso, R., Pasa, A. and Mori, T. (2002). Influence of student’s prior learning experiences, learning conceptions and approaches on their learning outcomes. Quality conversations: 2002. Annual International Conference. Higher Education Research & Development Society of Australasia. Perth.

Lewis, C. & Tsuchida, I. (1997). Planned educational change in Japan: The shift to student-centered elementary science.Journal of Educational Policy, (12)5, 313-331.

Lewis, C. 2002. Lesson study: A handbook of teacher-led instructional change. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools.

Muhibbin Syah, 2010. Psikologi Pendidikan dengan Pendekatan Baru. Bandung, PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Purwanto, M. Ngalim. 1998. Ilmu Pendidikan Teoretis dan Praktis. Bandung: Remaja Rosda

Podhorsky, C. & Moore, V. 2006. Issues in curriculum: Improving instructional practice through lesson study. Tersedia pada http://www.lessonstudy.net. Diakses tgl 27 Nopember 2013.

Sudijono, A., 2003. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Van den berg et al, 2005. The Impact of Affective and cognitive focus on attitude formation, Journal of Experimental Social Psycology 42. 373 – 379. Elsevier University of Amsterdam, Roetersstaad 15.

Watty, Kim, 2005, Quality In Accounting Education : What Say The Academics?, Quality Assurance in Education, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 120-131, Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., Bingley.

Yoshida, M.(1999). Lesson study: A case study of a Japanese approach to improving instruction through school-based teacher development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.

Published

2017-12-08

How to Cite

Aprizal, A. (2017). ENHANCING STUDENTSÔÇÖ LEARNING OUTCOME IN SPORT CLASS THROUGH STUDENT FACILITATOR AND EXPLAINING (SFE) TEACHING MODEL. Ta’dib, 20(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v20i2.609

Issue

Section

Artikel