An Islamic Political Jurisprudence Analysis of Reproductive Health Services under Article 103(4)(e) of Government Regulation No. 28/2024

Authors

  • Yoga Mai Hidayat Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar
  • Khairina Khairina UIN Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar
  • Alfi Husni UIN Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar
  • Yustiloviani Yustiloviani UIN Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar
  • Deri Rizal UIN Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31958/alushuliy.v4i1.15712

Keywords:

Contraception, Adolescents, Reproductive Health, Fiqh Siyasah, , Government Regulation No. 28/2024

Abstract

This study examines the provision of reproductive health services as stipulated in Article 103 Paragraph (4) Letter e of Government Regulation (PP) No. 28 of 2024, focusing specifically on the distribution of contraceptives to school-aged children and adolescents. The research investigates the background and rationale behind the issuance of this regulation and analyzes it through the lens of fiqh siyasah (Islamic political jurisprudence). Employing a qualitative normative approach, this study is based on library research by systematically reviewing relevant literature, including books, scholarly articles, journals, and official publications. The researcher acts as the primary research instrument.The findings suggest that the emergence of this provision is influenced by several urgent social issues: the rise in teenage promiscuity, high rates of abortion among adolescents aged 15ÔÇô19, an increasing number of marriage dispensations due to premarital sexual activity, and efforts to reduce the transmission of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), including HIV/AIDS. From the perspective of fiqh siyasah, the legality of contraceptive distribution depends on the marital status of the recipients. For married adolescents, the use of contraceptives is considered permissible. However, for those who are unmarried, it is deemed impermissible (haram) as it potentially facilitates or legitimizes acts of zina (adultery), which are prohibited in Islamic law.

References

Akinoǧlu, O., & Tandoǧan, R. Ö. (2007). The effects of problem-based active learning in science education on students’ academic achievement, attitude and concept learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75375

Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. In ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report.

Cahyani, V. D., & Pranata, O. D. (2023). Studi Aktivitas Belajar Sains Siswa di SMA Negeri 7 Kerinci. Lensa (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 13(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v13i2.317

Cavanagh, A. J., Aragón, O. R., Chen, X., Couch, B., Durham, M., Bobrownicki, A., Hanauer, D. I., & Graham, M. J. (2016). Student buy-in to active learning in a college science course. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-07-0212

Chi, M. T. H. (2009). Active-Constructive-Interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 73–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Science. Second Edition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Edelson, D. C. (2001). Learning-for-Use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 355–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3<355::AID-TEA1010>3.0.CO;2-M

Fink, L. D. (2013). Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses. Jossey-Bass.

Graham, C., & Longchamps, P. (2022). Transformative Education. A Showcase of Sustainable and Integrative Active Learning. Taylor & Francis Books. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003276203

Hsu, Y.-S. (2015). Development Of Science Teachers’ TPACK: East Asian Practices (Y.-S. Hsu (ed.)). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-441-2_2

Leech, N. L., Barret, K. C., & Morgan, G. A. (2005). SPSS for Intermediate Statistics. Use and Interpretation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. All.

Lombardi, D., Shipley, T. F., Astronomy, T., Biology, T., Chemistry, T., Engineering, T., Geography, T., Geoscience, T., & Physics, T. (2021). The Curious Construct of Active Learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 22(1), 8–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620973974

Michael, J. (2006). Where’s the evidence that active learning works? American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education, 30(4), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00053.2006

Michael, J., & Modell, H. (2003). Active Learning in Secondary and College Science Classrooms. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2004.00432_10.x

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7342

Morgan, G. A., Leech, N. L., Gloeckner, G. W., & Barret, K. C. (2004). SPSS for Introductory Statistics. Use and Interpretation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. All.

OECD. (2018). The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030. In OECD Education Working Papers. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/

Pranata, O. D. (2023a). Enhancing Conceptual Understanding and Concept Acquisition of Gravitational Force through Guided Inquiry Utilizing PhET Simulation. Saintek: Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi, 15(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.31958/js.v15i1.9191

Pranata, O. D. (2023b). Physics Education Technology (PhET) as Confirmatory Tools in Learning Physics. Jurnal Riset Fisika Edukasi Dan Sains, 10(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.22202/jrfes.2023.v10i1.6815

Pranata, O. D. (2024). Students ’ understanding of vector operations : With and without physics education technology simulation. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 4(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/14633

Pranata, O. D., Sastria, E., Ferry, D., & Zebua, D. R. Y. (2023). Analysis of Students’ Emotional Intelligence and Their Relationship with Academic Achievement in Science. Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Science and Education, ICoeSSE, 395–410. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-142-5

Pranata, O. D., Seprianto, S., Adelia, I., Darwata, S. R., & Noperta, N. (2022). Science Outreach at Madrasa Menggunakan Simulasi PhET (Physics Education Technology). RANGGUK: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 02(02), 1–9.

Pranata, O. D., Sundari, P. D., & Sulaiman, D. (2023). Exploring Project-Based Learning : Physics E-Posters in Pre- Service Science Education. KONSTAN (Jurnal Fisika Dan Pendidikan Fisika), 8(2), 116–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20414/konstan.v8i02.387

Pranata, O. D., Yuliati, L., & Wartono. (2017). Concept Acquisition of Rotational Dynamics by Interactive Demonstration and Free-Body Diagram. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 11(3), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v11i3.6410

Putri, A. L., Pranata, O. D., & Sastria, E. (2024). Students Perception of Science and Technology in Science Learning: A Gender Comparative Study. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 19(1), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v19i1.6153

Utami, A. F., Pranata, O. D., & Angela, L. (2024). Analisis Tingkat Kejenuhan Siswa Sebelum , Selama , dan Setelah Pembelajaran Sains. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.8.1.1-9

Wulandari, W., & Pranata, O. D. (2023). Analisis Kecerdasan Emosional Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Sains. Diksains: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Sains, 3(2), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.33369/diksains.3.2.124-133

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Hidayat, Y. M., Khairina, K., Husni, A., Yustiloviani, Y., & Rizal, D. (2025). An Islamic Political Jurisprudence Analysis of Reproductive Health Services under Article 103(4)(e) of Government Regulation No. 28/2024. Al Ushuliy: Jurnal Mahasiswa Syariah Dan Hukum, 4(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.31958/alushuliy.v4i1.15712

Issue

Section

Articles