Law Enforcement Barriers to Cross-Border Cybercrime in Indonesia: A Comparative Study with the Philippines
Keywords:
Law enforcement, Cross-border cybercrime, Budapest Convention, Legal System TheoryAbstract
Cross-border cybercrime poses significant challenges to national law enforcement because digital offenses transcend territorial jurisdictions and rely on volatile electronic evidence. In Indonesia, enforcement remains hindered by fragmented jurisdiction, limited digital forensic capacity, weak mutual legal assistance mechanisms, constrained extradition arrangements, and incomplete harmonization of domestic law with international standards. This article examines these challenges through Lawrence Friedman’s Legal System Theory, focusing on the dimensions of legal structure, legal substance, and legal culture. Employing normative legal research with statute and comparative approaches, the study analyzes primary legal materials, including Law No. 1 of 2024 amending the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, Law No. 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection, Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code, and the 2001 Budapest Convention on Cybercrime, supported by relevant secondary sources. The findings reveal that Indonesia’s enforcement difficulties arise not only from incomplete legal harmonization but also from weak procedural mechanisms for cross-border electronic evidence, limited institutional capacity, inadequate digital forensic resources, and ineffective international cooperation. A comparison with the Philippines, the only ASEAN member state to have ratified the Budapest Convention, shows that ratification facilitates access to international cooperation and capacity-building programs but does not automatically ensure effective enforcement, as significant implementation gaps remain. The study therefore recommends Indonesia’s conditional ratification of the Budapest Convention through reservation mechanisms that safeguard digital sovereignty, particularly regarding Article 32, accompanied by targeted amendments to the Electronic Information and Transactions Law and the Personal Data Protection Law to strengthen domestic enforcement capacity.
References
Abdelkarim, Ya. A. (2025). UN Cybercrime Convention: Implementing the Mutual Legal Assistance in the Digital Age. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law, 3(4), 543–569. https://doi.org/10.21202/jdtl.2025.22
Adinda, F. A., Rahmawati, E., Suparman, E., Arifin, R., & Ezzerouali, S. (2025). The Challenge of Admitting Electronic Evidence in Civil Procedure Law. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 13(3), 656–680. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v13i3.1873
Auliaurrahman, A., Anshari, N., & Firdaus, S. U. (2025). The Existence and Regulation of Cyber Law: The Government’s Role in Combating Digital Crime in Indonesia. Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan Dan Ekonomi Islam, 17(1), 206–223. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v17i1.10612
Bassiouni, C. (2014). International Extradition: United States Law and Practice. Oxford University Press. Oxford University PressNew York.
Billow, J. (2024). No country is an island: Embracing international law enforcement cooperation to reduce the impact of cybercrime. Journal of Cyber Policy, 9(2), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2023.2245417
Boudermine, M. (2025). Finalization Of The United Nations Convention On Combating Cybercrime—Challenges And Opportunities Of Overcoming Them. 62, 156–173.
Brenners, S. W. (2010). Cybercrime: Criminal Threats from Cyberspace. Praeger.
Bunga, D. (2019). Legal Response to Cybercrime in Global and National Dimensions. PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law), 06(01), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v6n1.a4
Casino, F., Pina, C., López-Aguilar, P., Batista, E., Solanas, A., & Patsakis, C. (2022). SoK: Cross-border Criminal Investigations and Digital Evidence (Version 1). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2205.12911
Clough, J. (2014). A World of Difference: The Budapest Convention On Cybercrime And The Challenges Of Harmonisation. Monash University Law Review, 40, 698.
Davies, G., & Kennedy-Mayo, D. (2026). The promise and pitfalls of the Second Protocol to the Budapest Convention: Assessing its impact on EU and UK cross-border criminal investigations. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 17(1), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844261419413
Efendi Tanjung, R., Ansyari Siregar, A., & Siahaan, N. (2026). Legal Analysis of Police Challenges in Facing Transnational Cyber Crime. International Journal of Science and Environment (IJSE), 6(1), 1217–1223. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijse.v6i1.392
ENISA. (2023). Enisa Threat Landscape. European Union Agency For Cybersecurity.
Flora, H. S., Thuong, M. T. H., & Erawati, R. D. (2023). The Orientation and Implications of New Criminal Code: An Analysis of Lawrence Friedman’s Legal System. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 11(1), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v11i1.1169
Friedman, L. M. (1975). Legal System, The: A Social Science Perspective. Russell Sage Foundation. JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/9781610442282
Hamzah, A. (2013). Aspek-aspek Pidana di Bidang Komputer. Sinar Grafika.
Malikzada, T. (2026). Assessing the Role of International Law in Regulating the Fight Against Cybercrime in the Digital Environment. Futurity Economics&Law, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2026.03.25.01
Marcén, A. G. (2024). The Budapest Convention and the UN Cybercrime Convention negotiations. In A. Segura Serrano, Global Cybersecurity and International Law (1st ed., pp. 174–192). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003344124-10
Moeso Novianto & Nur Arfiani. (2025). KEJAHATAN SIBER DAN PERDAGANGAN DATA GELAP (DARK WEB): TANTANGAN HUKUM INDONESIA DALAM KONTEKS BUDAPEST CONVENTION. Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge, 5(7), 8249–8268. https://doi.org/10.53625/jirk.v5i7.11929
Moise, A. C. (2024). Procedural Aspects of the Second Additional Protocol to the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov. Series VII: Social Sciences • Law, 189–196. https://doi.org/10.31926/but.ssl.2023.16.65.3.23
N. A. Luhina, & O. M. Paliukh. (2025). Legal Challenges of International Cooperation in Combating Cybercrime: Prospects for Improving the Regulatory Framework. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.15080178
Nicholas L Tobing, A., & Fitria, A. (2025). Jurisdiction and Locus Delicti of Transnational Cybercrime: A Normative Study Of International Law and Indonesian Telematics Law. Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 5(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.55324/iss.v5i1.951
Peters, A., & Jordan, A. (2022). Countering the Cyber Enforcement Gap: Strengthening Global Capacity on Cybercrime. Center On National Security.
Ramadanti, N. K. (2024). Strategi Pemberantasan Cybercrime Lintas Batas: Implementasi Mekanisme Mutual Legal Assistance berdasarkan Permenkumham Nomor 12 Tahun 2022. Padjadjaran Law Review, 12(2), 184–195. https://doi.org/10.56895/plr.v12i2.1829
Sari, M. N. (2024). Cybercrime in Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Journal of Information Policy, 14, 568–598. https://doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.14.2024.0016
Sarkar, G., & Shukla, S. K. (2026). Policing Transnational Cybercrime: A Critical Assessment of the Anticipated Impact of the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime in India and Worldwide. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5899223
Sitompul, J. (2020). Cross-border Access to Electronic Evidence: Improving Indonesian Law and Practice in Investigating Cybercrime. Eleven International Publishing.
Situmeang, S. M. T., Kamilia, E. R., Lutfiyah, N., & Aurora, D. M. (2026). Enforcement of the universality principle in combating cybercrime as a transnational crime. Sortuz: Oñati Journal of Emergent Socio-Legal Studies, 16(1), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.35295/sz.iisl.2411
Suseno, S., Ramli, A. M., Mayana, R. F., Safiranita, T., & Aurellia Nathania Tiarma, B. (2025). Cybercrime in the new criminal code in Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 11(1), 2439543. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2439543
Tobing, A. N. L., & Fitria, A. (2026). LEGAL JURISDICTION AND PLACE OF OCCURENCE IN TRANSNATIONAL CYBERCRIME: A NORMATIVE ANALYSIS OF GLOBAL LAW AND INDONESIAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATIONS. Awang Long Law Review, 8(2), 530–538. https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v8i2.1894
UNODC. (2013). Comprehensive Study on Cybercrime. UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME.
Velázquez, H. L. C. (2025). Strengthening Global Cooperation: International Legal Frameworks for Combatting Emerging Cyber Threats and Cybercrime. Unpublished. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33288.94720
Wicki-Birchler, D. (2020). The Budapest Convention and the General Data Protection Regulation: Acting in concert to curb cybercrime? International Cybersecurity Law Review, 1(1–2), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1365/s43439-020-00012-5
Yiu-Chung Lau, L. (2025). Cybercrime in Asia: Policing, Technological Environment, and Cyber-Governance in China and Vietnam. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-80213-3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fadhli Muhaimin Ishaq
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a?áCreative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License?áthat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See?áThe Effect of Open Access).
?á
?á
