Religious Court Judges’ Ratio Decidendi on Excessive Murabahah Penalties: A Rawlsian Analysis

Authors

  • Aji Saifulloh Aji Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
  • Muhammad Fakhril Umam Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31958/alushuliy.v5i1.16878

Keywords:

Ratio Decidendi, John Rawls, murabahah financing, substantive justice

Abstract

This study analyzes the judges’ ratio decidendi in Decision Number 156/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Smn concerning the imposition of late-payment penalties exceeding the principal amount in a murabahah financing contract and examines its conformity with John Rawls’ theory of justice. This normative legal research employs case and conceptual approaches. The primary legal material is Decision Number 156/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Smn, while secondary materials consist of DSN-MUI Fatwas and relevant scholarly literature. Data were analyzed qualitatively through legal interpretation of the judges’ reasoning and the principles of justice underlying the decision. The findings show that the judges’ ratio decidendi was based on the principle of pacta sunt servanda, emphasizing contractual legal certainty and the binding force of agreements. Consequently, the court ordered the payment of the remaining financing obligation of Rp209,700,000 and a late-payment penalty of Rp226,800,000. However, from the perspective of John Rawls’ theory of justice, the decision does not fully reflect substantive justice because it inadequately considers the defendants’ economic hardship caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. The decision therefore reflects legal-formal justice and highlights the need to balance legal certainty, proportionality, and protection of vulnerable parties in resolving Islamic economic disputes.

References

Audrey Adyuta Putri, & Elisatris Gultom. (2025). John Rawls’ Theory of Justice in the Perspective of Shareholder Rights Protection. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Dan Pendidikan, 4(1), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.55606/inovasi.v4i1.4326

Azami, T., & Kustanto, A. (2025). Penerapan Prinsip Pacta Sunt Servanda dalam Hubungan Kontrak Bisnis. SOSIO DIALEKTIKA, 10(2), 264–283. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31942/sd.v10i2.14826

Bachsin, A., Adiyaksa, A. F., Fathi, H., & Ekoputro, H. (2025). Peran Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda dalam Menjamin Kepastian Hukum Kontrak di Indonesia. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(3), 2531–2539. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i3.1665

Belista, S., & Pratama, R. A. (2025). Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim mengenai Wanprestasi dalam Perkara Perjanjian Kredit di Tiga Tingkatan Peradilan. Jurnal Media Justitia Nusantara, 15(2), 289–298. https://doi.org/10.30999/mjn.v15i2.3728

Dali, M. W., Mahmud, Y. I., & Hasan, E. R. (2025). Eksistensi dan Implementasi Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda dalam Sistem Hukum Perjanjian. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmiah, 2(12), 2226–2233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62335/cendekia.v2i12.2125

Elvia, E. E., Mujib, A., Nor, A., & Akbar, M. I. (2023). Basyarnas As a Place for Dispute Resolution of Musyarakah Financing in Sharia Banking in the Disruption Era. El-Mashlahah, 13(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.23971/el-mashlahah.v13i1.5345

Fajrin, Z. A. (2024). Ratio Decidendi Putusan Pengadilan Agama Jember Tentang Wanprestasi Akad Murabahah Tinjauan Teori Keadilan Murtadha Muthahhari. Journal of Islamic Business Law, 8(4), 37–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18860/jibl.v8i4.5806

Ismah, J. D., Aulia, J. I., & Mauridania, I. winda. (2025). Relevansi Prinsip Welfare State terhadap Perlindungan Hukum Kreditur dan Debitur Kredit Macet Akibat Force Majeur Gempa Palu 2018. Rewag Rencang: Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(10), 1–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v6i10.2276

Khalidin, B., Musa, A., & Kiawan, A. (2023). Murabahah financing of the Indonesian Islamic banks Under an Islamic Economic Law and the Fatwa DSN MUI. Petita: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 8(2), 203–218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v8i2.238

Khilmi, F. M., & Triana, N. (2025). Force Majeure dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Iqtishaduna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 7(1), 403–411. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24252/iqtishaduna.v7i1.61278

Khomayny, M., & Badullah, M. W. (2020). Perlakuan Denda Pembiayaan Berbasis Konsep Al-Adl Dalam Menjaga Eksistensi Bisnis Bank Syariah. Jurnal Iqtisaduna, 6(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.24252/iqtisaduna.v6i2.18117

Kinasih, K. S., & Huda, M. (2024). Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Permohonan Poligami Dengan Sebab Hasrat Libido Tinggi Perspektif Teori Keadilan Hukum John Rawls (Studi Putusan Nomor 1330/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Lmj). Al-Fattah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial, 1(2), 76–102. https://doi.org/https://journal.stai-almujtama.ac.id/index.php/al-fattah/article/view/112

Madung, O. G. N. (2022). Konsep Liberalisme Politik John Rawls sebagai Jawaban terhadap Tantangan Masyarakat Plural dan Kritik Atasnya. DISKURSUS, 18(2), 218–237. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36383/diskursus.v18i2.327

Maghfiroh, L., Hidayat, M. R., Salsabila, S. M., & Putri, Sy. S. (2025). An Analytical Study on the Application of Justice Theory in the Perspective of Legal Philosophy: A Case Study of the Aggravated Assault on David Ozora. Media Hukum Indonesia, 3(4), 308–315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17483522

Martinelli, I., Arifin, V. A., & Nikijuluw, P. T. E. (2026). Pertimbangan Hukum Mahkamah Agung dalam Putusan Nomor 5035 K/PDT/2025 tentang Wanprestasi sebagai Instrumen Penegakan Kepastian Hukum dalam Perjanjian Perdata di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah Dan Riset Sosial Humaniora, 5(3), 92–100. https://doi.org/https://ejournal.penerbitjurnal.com/index.php/humaniora/article/view/1440

Mukhsin, M. (2024). The Renewal of Islamic Economic Law Studi Komparatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Murabahah Antara. The Renewal of Islamic Economic Law, 5(2), 90–99.

Patingki, F., Katili, A. Y., & Virmansah, B. (2026). Teori Keadilan John Rawls dan Tantangannya dalam Kebijakan Publik di Era Ketimpangan Sosial. Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik, 3(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.69623/j-emspol.v3i1.226

Prima, N., Bianda, R., & Rochim, A. (2026). Implementasi Denda Keterlambatan Nasabah pada Akad Murabahah di Perbankan Syariah Berdasarkan Fatwa DSN-MUI. AL-AFKAR : Journal for Islamic Studies, 9(2), 591–609. https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v9i2.3355.Implementation

Rahma, A. A. (2021). Praktik Penerapan Denda Keterlambatan Pada Pembiayaan Akad Murabahah. Journal of Islamic Business Law, 5(3), 24–38. https://doi.org/https://urj.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/jibl/article/view/859

Rasyid, M. (2021). Problematics of Implementation of the Mudhārabah Contract on Sharia Banking in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Law, 2(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v2i1.135

Salsabila, W. S., & Halili, H. (2026). Dualisme Kewenangan Pengadilan Negeri dan Pengadilan Agama terkait Penetapan Pengampunan Ditinjau dari Asas Kepastian Hukum. Viva Justicia : Journal of Private Law, 2(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.22146/vj.29572

Sigit, P., Saepudin, A., Bahri, S., & Purnama, Y. (2021). Implementasi Denda Pada Akad Murabahah Dalam Perspektif Ekonomi Syariah Di BMT Purwakarta Amanah Sejahtera ( PAS ). EKSISBANK (Ekonomi Syariahh Dan Bisnis Perbankan, 05(1), 131–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37726/ee.v5i1.113

Sunaryo, S. (2022). Konsep Fairness John Rawls, Kritik dan Relevansinya. Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1911

Susilo, E., & Negara, D. S. (2025). Ratio Decidendi dan Obiter Dictum : Evolusi Konseptual Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Putusan Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Negara Hukum, 16(2), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v16i2.5049

Syamsiah, D., Bao, R. M., & Yuliana, N. F. (2023). Dasar Penerapan Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda dalam Perjanjian. Jurnal Das Sollen, 9(2), 841–848. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32520/das-sollen.v9i2.2988

Tektona, R. I., Susanti, D. O., & Iskliyono, S. E. (2020). Jurnal Supremasi ,. Jurnal Supremasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 10(2), 52–65.

Tsalitsah, I. M. (2024). Internalisasi Nilai-Nilai Maqasid Syariah dalam Psikoterapi Keluarga Muslim. MAQASID : Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam, 13(2), 189–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30651/mqs.v13i2.27444

Widjaja, A., Idrus, A. M., Maulidah, T. A., Asti, M. J., & Nurjannah. (2023). The Implementation of E-Commerce Consumer Option Rights (Khiyar) in Realizing Transaction Justice: A Study of Maqasid Al-Shariah. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 17(1), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v17i1.7673

Wihelmus Jemarut, I Gusti Agung Andriani, & Pahrur Rizal. (2023). Penetapan Upah Minimum dalam Perpektif Teori Keadilan John Rawls. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 4(1), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.4.1.6457.133-144

Yuanita, A. C. (2022). Menelaah Konsep Keadilan Hukum Teori John Rawls dalam Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja secara Sepihak terhadap Pekerja Migran Indonesia di Luar Negeri. IDJ, 3(2), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.19184/idj.v3i2.34553

Zuhrah. (2023). Urgensi Independensi Hakim dalam Berbagai Disparitas Putusan Perkara Korupsi. Sangaji: Jurnal Pemikiran Syariah Dan Hukum, 7(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52266/sangaji.v6i2.1259

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Aji, A. S., & Muhammad Fakhril Umam. (2026). Religious Court Judges’ Ratio Decidendi on Excessive Murabahah Penalties: A Rawlsian Analysis. Al Ushuliy: Jurnal Mahasiswa Syariah Dan Hukum, 5(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.31958/alushuliy.v5i1.16878

Issue

Section

Articles