ISHLAH DALAM TAKHARUJ MENURUT HANAFIYAH VERSUS ISHLAH DALAM KOMPILASI HUKUM ISLAM (ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN HUKUM)

Authors

  • Elfia Elfia UIN Imam Bonjol Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v17i1.1010

Keywords:

Ishlah, Takharuj, Kebijakan Hukum

Abstract

This study aims at analyzing  the two forms of legal policy in the division of inheritance by using the principle of ishlah. The takharuj practices that develops in the Hanafi school allows the giving of inheritance rights to the heirs before the property is distributed (before the heirs dies) in the presence of the willingness of the other heirs.  The term Ishlah is understood by giving rewards in exchange for the part of the resigned heirs. The principle of ishlah which permits the distribution of inheritance under the agreement of the heirs is also regulated in the Compilation of Islamic Law Article 183. But in that article, the existence of ishlah can be done after the heirs died (after the division of inheritance). This research is a library research by using normative law approach and analyzing the data by content analysis. As the findings from this study, there are several weak points in the completion of the takharuj so that clerics outside Hanafiyah school did not practice it. These weak points potentially violate the qath'i propositions and general principles in muamalah maaliyah. The peace (ishlah) in the Compilation of Islamic Law is easier to follow and does not violate the qath'i proofs in the Qur'an and Hadith.

References

Ahmad, Md Yazid, Amalan Mufakat dan Aplikasi Takharuj dalam Pengagihan Pusaka Menurut Perspektif Undang-undang Pusaka Islam, dalam Jurnal Islamiyyat; Bangi Vol. 39, Iss. 1, (2017): 21-28.ISL.
Ali, Mohammad Daud, Hukum Islam, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum di Indonesia, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2005, hlm. 313.
Efendi, Satria. 2004. Problematika Hukum Keluarga Islam Kontemporer. Jakarta: Kencana. Cet. ke-1
Hasaballah, Ali. 1976. Ushul al-Tasyri’ al-Islami,Mesir: Dar al-Ma’arif. 1976. cet. ke-5
Ibn Abidin. tt. Hasyiyah Radd al-Muhtar ‘ala ad-Durr al-Mukhtar. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyah. Juz. IV dan VI. Cet.ke-2
Ibnu al-Humam. 1970. Syarh Fath al-Qadir. Mesir: Mustafa al-Babiy al-Halabiy. Juz.8
Ibn Qudamah. 1970.al-Mughniy. Kairo: Maktabah al-Qahiriyah. Juz. VI
Ibn Taimiyah. 2001. al-Qawa’id al-Nuraniyah al-Fiqhiyah. Riyadh: Maktabah al-Rusyd. Cet. ke-Juz.II
Musa,Yusuf. 1960.at-Tirkah wa al-Mirast fi al-Islam, Kairo:Dar al-Ma'rifah
Al-Subki, Imam Tajuddin ‘Abd al-Wahab. 1991. al-Asybah wa al-Nazhair. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyah. Cet. ke-1
Syarifuddin, Amir. 2004. Hukum Kewarisan Islam. Jakarta :Prenada Media
_____. 1999. Permasalahan Dalam Pelaksanaan Faraid. Padang: IAIN IB Press
_____. 2004. Hukum Kewarisan Islam, Jakarta: Kencana, Prenada Media. Ed.1. Cet.ke- 1
Tim Redaksi Citra Umbara, Kompilasi Hukum Islam, Bandung : Citra Umbara, 2012: 379
Zahrah, Muhammad Abu, t.t. Ushul al-Fiqh. Kairo: Dar al-Fikr al-Arabiy
Al-Zuhaily,Wahbah. 1997. al-Fiqh al-Islamiy wa Adillatuhu. Damsyiq : Dar al-Fikr. Juz. 8 dan 10

Published

2018-06-30

How to Cite

Elfia, E. (2018). ISHLAH DALAM TAKHARUJ MENURUT HANAFIYAH VERSUS ISHLAH DALAM KOMPILASI HUKUM ISLAM (ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN HUKUM). JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah), 17(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v17i1.1010

Issue

Section

Articles