KEBIJAKAN EKONOMI UMAR BIN KHATTHAB

Authors

  • Rizal Fahlefi STAIN Batusangkar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v13i2.1138

Keywords:

Umar bin Khatthab, kebijakan, ekonomi, maslahah jamiÔÇÖiyyah

Abstract

The leadership of Umar bin Khatthab had showed that the implementation the role (syariÔÇÖat) of Islam did not stop a nation leader to be creative and innovative to make his country peace and wealth coming true. He had made a farm economy wish and an economy wish in general impartially, tolerantly, and orientally. He developed the priciples of economy in which every one could get his or her right and obligation based on the Koran (Al-QurÔÇÖan) and its ordinary. It was done by respecting and helping each other. He also took the advantages of some factors such as production, land, employee, capital, and protecting the individual or group domination.

References

Ellis, Rod. 2009. Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, volume 1 2009. Shanghai International Studies and University of Auckland.

Fu, T. (2012). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in a Chinese as a foreign language class: Do perceptions and the reality match? Unpublished master thesis. University of Victoria.

Kagimoto, E., & Rodgers, M. P. H. (2008). Students’ perceptions of corrective feedback. In K. Bradford Watts, T. Muller, & M. Swanson (Eds.), JALT2007 Conference Proceedings. Tokyo: JALT

Kato, M. (2007). Corrective Feedback in oral communication classes at a Japanese senior high school. The Language Teacher, 31(3), 3-8

Li, Liu. 2014. Corrective Feedback in Classrooms at Different Proficiency Levels: A Case Study of Chinese as a Foreign Language. Department of Modern Languages and Classics, Ball State University.

Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. C. and Bhatia, T. K. (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Lyster, R. (2004) Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20 (1), 51-92.

Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19 (1), 37-66

Lyster, R. (1998). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48, 183-218.

Lyster, R., & Mori, H. (2006). Corrective feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 269300

Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (2000). Do learners recognize implicit negative feedback as feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22 (4), 471-497.

Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 573-595.

Schmidt, R. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions of applied linguistics. AILA Review, 11, 11-26.

Sung, K. , Tsai, H. & Sung, K. (2013). Exploring Student Errors, Teachers’ Corrective Feedback (CF), Learner Uptake and Repair, and Learners’ Preferences of CF. The Journal of Language Learning and Teaching, 4(1), 37-54.

Downloads

Published

2018-08-24

How to Cite

Fahlefi, R. (2018). KEBIJAKAN EKONOMI UMAR BIN KHATTHAB. JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah), 13(2). https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v13i2.1138

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2014)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Rizal Fahlefi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).