Addressing MSMEs Customer Complaints in IndonesiaÔÇÖs Digital Economy: Insights from Sharia and Consumer Protection Law

Miguna Astuti; Anastasia Bernadin Dwi Mardiatmi; Afrina Sari; Fransisca Iriani Roesmala Dewi

doi:10.31958/juris.v23i2.13216

Authors

Miguna Astuti Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, South Jakarta
Anastasia Bernadin Dwi Mardiatmi Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, South Jakarta
Afrina Sari University of Budi Luhur, South Jakarta
Fransisca Iriani Roesmala Dewi University of Tarumanegara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v23i2.13216

Keywords:

Costumer Complaint, MSMEs, Digital Economy, Consumer Protection Law, Sharia Law

Abstract

This study examines MSME customer segmentation based on complaint behavior and the influence of Recency, Frequency, and Monetary (RFM) metrics. It integrates consumer protection law in Indonesia and sharia principles to address customer complaints. Using a mixed-method approach, quantitative analysis of RFM data and descriptive segmentation were combined with qualitative normative legal analysis. Data collection involved online and offline surveys in the Jabodetabek area using structured questionnaires covering RFM metrics, demographics, and complaint patterns. Findings reveal that 35.57% of MSMEs 4.0 customers belong to the "Faithful Customers" segment, characterized by loyalty despite limited financial contributions, crucial for business sustainability. Most customers, particularly younger and low-income groups, exhibit passive complaint behavior, favoring informal expressions of dissatisfaction over formal mechanisms. This highlights the need for strategies that prioritize emotional engagement and non-confrontational feedback to enhance retention and satisfaction. From the perspectives of Indonesian consumer protection law and sharia law, MSMEs must provide effective complaint channels and uphold fairness, transparency, and deliberation. These principles are vital for maintaining customer trust and ensuring long-term business success, emphasizing the importance of aligning customer engagement with ethical and legal standards.

References

Anggara, Sahya. 2016. Administrasi Keuangan Negara. Bandung: CV. Pustaka Setia.

Audah, Ali. 2016. Ali Bin Abi Thalib Sampai Kepada Hasan Dan Hussein. Jakarta: Timtamas Indonesia.

Dondo, Tesalonika Chrisdianten, Noortje Marsellanie Benu, and Elsa Pauline Manginsela. 2019. “Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Ketimpangan Distribusipendapatan Rumah Tangga Di Kabupaten Minahasa.” Agrirud 1(1): 60–70.

Fahlefi, Rizal. 2014. “Kebijakan Ekonomi Umar Bin Khattab.” Juris 13(2): 126–38.

Hamzah, Saidin, and Hamriana. 2022. “Khulafah Al-Rasyidun: Masa Kepemimpinan Ali Bin Abi Thalib.” CARITA: Jurnal Sejarah dan Budaya 1(1): 129–38. https://ejurnal.iainpare.ac.id/index.php/carita/article/view/3465%0Ahttps://ejurnal.iainpare.ac.id/index.php/carita/article/download/3465/1242.

Holis, Moh. 2016. “Sistem Distribusi Dalam Perspektif Ekonomi Islam.” Masharif al-Syariah 1(2): 1–14. http://journal.um-surabaya.ac.id/index.php/Mas/article/view/759/554.

Ibrahim, Arif, Undang Ahmad Darsa, and Titin Nurhayati Ma’mun. 2019. “Wasiat Rasulullah Kepada Ali Bin Abi Thalib Dalam Naskah Washiyyatu Al-Mustafa (Edisi Teks Dan Terjemahan).” Jumantara: Jurnal Manuskrip Nusantara 10(2): 125–48.

Kalsum, Ummi. 2018. “Distribusi Pendapatan Dan Kekayaan Dalam Ekonomi Islam.” Li Falah: Jurnal Studi Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam 3(1): 41–59.

Kambali, Muhammad. 2021. “Konsep Kepemilikan Dan Distribusi Pendapatan Dalam Sistem Ekonomi Islam.” Jurnal Al-Iqthishod 9(2): 127–50.

Maisyaroh. 2020. “Kepemimpinan ‘Utsmanbin ‘Affan Dan ‘Alibin Abi Thalib.” Ihya Al Arabiyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan sastra Arab 1: 178–80.

Mufid, Abdul. 2020. “Pinangan Ali Bin Abi Thalib Kepada Juwairiyah Binti Abu Jahal: Analisis Fiqh Al-Hadits.” Jurnal Ushuluddin 28(1): 15.

Murtiningsih. 2018. “Tuduhan Nepotisme Terhadap Utsman Bin Affan Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kekhalifahan Ali Bin Abi Thalib.” Jurnal Ilmu Agama: Mengkaji Doktrin, Pemikiran, dan Fenomena Agama 19(1): 159–76.

Mustofa, Zamzam et al. 2021. “Diskursus Alasan-Alasan Nabi Muhammad Saw Melarang Sahabat Ali Bin Abi Thalib Dalam Berpoligami Menurut Iffah Qanita Nailiya.” Inisiasi 10(2): 169–78.

Qoyum, Abdul et al. 2021. Sejarah Pemikiran Ekonomi Islam. Jakarta: Departemen Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah Bank Indonesia.

Rahim, Abdul. 2020. Perkembangan Pemikiran Ekonomi Islam. Makassar: Yayasan Berkode.

Ridwan, and Ihsan Suciawan Nawir. 2021. 6 Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar Ekonomi Publik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Rinawati, Ika, and Hari Basuki. 2020. “Analisis Perbandingan Makro Ekonomi Pemikiran Cendekiawan Muslim Klasik Dan Kontemporer Abu Yusuf, Abu Ubaid, Yahya Bin Adam Dan M.A Mannan, M.Umar Chapra.” Al-Iqtishod : Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah 2(1): 21–36. https://ejournal.iaiskjmalang.ac.id/index.php/iqtis/article/view/142/116.

Rostiana, Ita. 2009. “Dukungan Ali Bin Abi Thalib Terhadap Dakwah Rasulullah.” Dakwah 10(2): 119–42.

Samsir, Andi, and Abdul Rahman. 2018. “Menelusur Ketimpangan Distribusi Pendapatan Kabupaten Dan Kota Jurnal EcceS Abstract : In Search Disparity of Income Distribution of District.” 5: 22–42.

Shallabi, Ali Muhammad Ash. 2018. Biografi Ali Bin Abi Thalib. 5th ed. Jakarta Timur: Pustaka Al-Kautshar.

Suhendra, Indra, and Rah Adi Fahmi Ginanjar. 2021. DISTRIBUSI PENDAPATAN: Konteks PROVINSI Di Indonesia. Bandung: CV. Media Sains Indonesia.

Sumardi, Pip. 2020. “Internalisasi Pendidikan Karakter Melalui Keteladanan Ali Bin Abi Thalib Pada Mata Pelajaran Sejarah Kebudayaan Islam Di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah.” GHAITSA: Islamic Education Journal 1(3): 204–14. https://siducat.org/index.php/ghaitsa/article/view/103.