The Contestation of Legal Authority: Local Criminal Law, State Law, and Islamic Law in Nagari Pasia Laweh, West Sumatra
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v24i2.15092Keywords:
Constitutional Nagari, Criminal Law, Customary Law, Islamic Law, Legal Pluralism, Restorative JusticeAbstract
The enforcement of law in Indonesia reflects a complex interaction between national legislation, Islamic law, and local customary systems, revealing the country’s deeply plural legal landscape. This study aims to examine how legal authority is negotiated among these frameworks within the constitutional nagari of Pasia Laweh in West Sumatra. Employing a qualitative socio-legal method, the research draws on field data collected between 2017 and 2024 through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation to explore how the Kerapatan Adat Nagari (traditional council) resolves criminal cases. Findings indicate that at least seven minor criminal cases—such as theft, assault, and family-related offenses—were resolved through custom-based deliberation rather than formal state procedures. Sanctions typically included fines, public apologies, and reconciliation rituals, which were perceived by the community as more effective in restoring social harmony. From an Islamic perspective, these practices align with the principles of restorative justice and maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, emphasizing the preservation of social order and communal dignity. The study concludes that the customary justice system of Pasia Laweh does not contradict state or Islamic law but demonstrates an active contestation and negotiation of legal authority within Indonesia’s plural legal order. This research, by foregrounding the restorative nature and cultural legitimacy of customary practices, seeks to reposition justice not merely as a legal procedure but as a moral and social endeavor. In doing so, it contributes to the ongoing discourse on decolonizing justice and offers grounded reflections for reforming Indonesia’s criminal justice system in a culturally responsive manner.References
Antons, C. (2010). Customary law and legal pluralism in Indonesia. Journal of Legal Pluralism, 43(2), 127–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2010.10756662
Barendrecht, M., & Kovács, B. (2016). The need for local justice in Southeast Asia. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 11(2), 53–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2016.6
Bedner, A., & Vel, J. A. C. (2010). An analytical framework for empirical research on access to justice. Law, Social Justice & Global Development, 15(1), 1–21.
Benavides, M. (2017). Legal pluralism in Southeast Asia: An analytical framework. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 15(1), 99–121.
Benda-Beckmann, K. von. (2002). Who’s afraid of legal pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 47(1), 37–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2002.10756563
Butt, S. (2017). Traditional dispute resolution and legal pluralism in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 12(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2017.13
Butt, S. (2021). Customary law and the new Indonesian criminal code. Indonesia Law Review, 11(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v11n2.801
Cissé, A. (2020). Legal pluralism and the politics of law. Cambridge University Press.
De Sousa, D. (2018). Legal pluralism in postcolonial Africa. Springer.
Dicey, A. V. (1959). Introduction to the study of the law of the constitution (10th ed.). Macmillan.
Ehrlich, E. (1936). Fundamental principles of the sociology of law (W. L. Moll, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Fauzan, A. (2004). Hukum adat Indonesia. Penerbit Buku.
Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. (2012). Legal pluralism and human rights. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 4(3), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/hus010
Hadjon, P. M. (2005). Pengantar hukum administrasi Indonesia. Gadjah Mada University Press.
Hart, H. L. A. (2012). The concept of law (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Husar, A. (2020). Legal dualism and jurisdictional conflicts in customary land cases in West Sumatra. Indonesia Law Review, 10(3), 299–320. https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v10n3.649
Kelsen, H. (2009). General theory of law and state. Harvard University Press.
Lee, H. K., & Aymonier, G. (2019). The future of legal pluralism. Springer.
Leonard, A. (2022). Customary law, land rights, and legal pluralism in Indonesia. Springer.
Lindsey, T., & Nicholson, P. (2016). Drugs law and legal practice in Southeast Asia. Cambridge University Press.
Macdonald, R. (2017). The legal pluralism debate: Challenges and perspectives. International Journal of Legal Information, 45(3), 1–15.
Mahy, P. (2012). Adat and state law in contemporary Indonesia. Journal of Legal Pluralism, 64(1), 121–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2012.10756605
Mahy, P. (2019). Local customary law and state law in Indonesian villages: Synergy or conflict? Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 20(2), 129–145.
Merry, S. E. (1988). Legal pluralism. Law & Society Review, 22(5), 869–896. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053638
Mertus, J. (2016). Legal pluralism and human rights: Conflicts, politics, and challenges. International Journal of Human Rights, 20(7), 952–973. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2016.1181294
McLeod, D. (2017). The changing landscape of legal pluralism in Southeast Asia. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 48(1), 45–64.
Nader, L., & Todd, H. (2015). Legal pluralism in the twenty-first century. Routledge.
Nurjihad, T. (2021). Dinamika relasi hukum negara dan hukum adat dalam konteks negara hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 18(1), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1817
Peeters, J. (2020). The complexities of legal pluralism in Indonesia. Indonesia Law Review, 12(2), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v12n2.759
Robison, R., & Hadiz, V. R. (2004). Reorganizing power in Indonesia: The politics of oligarchy in an age of markets. Routledge.
Santos, B. de S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Paradigm Publishers.
Saptaningrum, I. (2022). Justice in the margins: Local dispute settlement in Indonesia. Yale Human Rights and Development Journal, 24(1), 77–104.
Schulte-Tenckhoff, I. (2010). Customary law and dispute resolution: The role of local governance in the rule of law. Oxford University Press.
Soares, B. M. (2017). Legal pluralism and human rights in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
Suryadi, S. (2022). Hukum adat dan integrasi dengan hukum negara: Studi kasus di Indonesia. Penerbit Buku.
Syarif, H. A. (2020). Negara hukum dan pengakuan hukum adat. Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat, 22(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.2345/jhm.2020.2201
Tamanaha, B. Z. (2008). Understanding legal pluralism: Past to present, local to global. Sydney Law Review, 30(3), 375–411.
Van den Anker, C. (2012). Critical perspectives on human rights in the 21st century. Routledge.
Weiner, M., & Schouten, P. (2021). Legal pluralism and dispute resolution in Indonesia. Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, D. A. (2014). The politics of legal pluralism. Harvard University Press.
Yulianti, N. P. (2021). The role of local justice systems in legal pluralism. International Journal of Law and Society, 5(1), 25–34.
Yuliana, N. M. (2021). Dispute resolution and the role of customary law in modern societies. Journal of Legal Anthropology, 23(3), 299–315.
Zaman, S. (2019). Dispute resolution and legal pluralism in postcolonial societies. Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Edi Rosman, Aidil Alfin, Miswardi, Bustamar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
