From Stewardship to Sustainability: A Comparative Analysis of Islamic Ecological Jurisprudence and Western Anthropocentric Regimes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v25i1.16040Keywords:
Islamic Ecological Jurisprudence, Western Anthropocentrism, Sustainability, Environmental Ethics, Green FinanceAbstract
The escalating global environmental crisis, exemplified by climate-induced displacement and systemic economic loss, necessitates an urgent critical re-evaluation of the ethical foundations of contemporary environmental policy. This study investigates the comparative efficiency of Islamic ecological jurisprudence and Western anthropocentric regimes, evaluating whether a synthesis of these paradigms can enhance global sustainability. To address methodological concerns, the research utilizes a mixed-methods design. The qualitative component employs a thematic content analysis of 675 Qur’anic verses, identified across 84 chapters, which were coded into practical mandates for water conservation, waste reduction, and sustainable resource management. These findings are framed by the theoretical principles of Tawheed (divine unity) and Khalifah (stewardship). The quantitative phase employs descriptive statistics to analyze the growth of Islamic green finance as a practical enforcement mechanism for environmental stewardship. Our analysis demonstrates a significant capital trajectory, with Islamic finance assets rising from $1.2 trillion in 2010 to $3.8 trillion in 2023. Through regional case studies, we examine specific mechanisms such as the implementation of environmental fatwas in Indonesia and Malaysia’s leadership in the Green Sukuk market, contrasting these with the decline of traditional hima protected zones in Saudi Arabia, from over 3,000 in the 1960s to fewer than 12 today. The study reveals that while Islamic principles offer a strong ecocentric alternative to the instrumentalist limitations of Western anthropocentrism, their practical application is often impeded by political and economic prioritization. This article contributes a novel hybrid framework that integrates the moral stewardship of Islamic jurisprudence with the market-driven regulatory mechanisms of Western legal systems to create a legally enforceable sustainability model.References
AbdelZaher, D., Kotb, A., & Helfaya, A. (2016). Eco-Islam: Beyond the Principles of Why and Into the Principles of How. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2016(1), 11024. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2016.11024abstract
Ahmed, H. (2017). Contribution of Islamic finance to the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. High-Level Conference on Financing for Development and the Means of Implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, 1–53. https://static.un.org/esa/ffd/high-level-conference-on-ffd-and-2030-agenda/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2017/11/Background-Paper_Islamic-Finance.pdf
Alam, N., Duygun, M., & Ariss, R. T. (2016). Green Sukuk: An Innovation in Islamic Capital Markets. In A. Dorsman, Ö. Arslan-Ayaydin, & M. B. Karan (Eds), Energy and Finance (pp. 167–185). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32268-1_10
Alibašić, H. (2024). Exploring the influence of Islamic governance and religious regimes on sustainability and resilience planning: A study of public administration in Muslim-majority countries. Public Policy and Administration, 39(4), 556–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767231223282
Alimuddin, A., Haq, I., & Ar, Z. (2025). Analysis of the Urgency of Sharia Fatwas on Zakat Management for Renewable Energy An Islamic Political Perspective in the Context of the Climate Crisis. International Journal of Sharia and Law, 1(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.65211/bn8a7351
Aminzadeh, S. C. (2006). A moral imperative: The human rights implications of climate change. Hastings Int’l & Comp. L. Rev., 30, 231. https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/hasint30§ion=16
Arauf, M. A. (2021). Ecological view from the perspective of quranic verses: Contesting the idea of religion and environment. International Journal of Social Science and Religion (IJSSR), 105–116. http://ijssr.net/index.php/ijssr/article/view/45
Brechin, J. (2013). A Study of the Use of Sharia Law in Religious Arbitration in the United Kingdom and the Concerns That This Raises for Human Rights. Ecclesiastical Law Journal, 15(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956618X13000434
Can, B., & Ahmed, Z. (2023). Do Islamic Values Matter for Environmental Protection? Empirical Evidence and Policy Suggestions Based on a Global Dataset. OPUS Journal of Society Research, 20(Human Behavior and Social Institutions), 881–897. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/opusjsr/issue/80235/1343467
Dewayanti, A., & Saat, N. (2020). Islamic organizations and environmentalism in Indonesia. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/ISEAS_Perspective_2020_117.pdf
Fadhli, A., & Warman, A. B. (2021). ‘Alasan Khawatir’ Pada Penetapan Hukum Dispensasi Kawin Di Pengadilan Agama Batusangkar ‘Reasons for Concern’ on Marriage Dispensation Decisions in Batusangkar Religious Court. Al-Ahwal, 14(2), 146–158. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2021.14203
Haider, A. (2025). The Impact of Islamic International Law on Contemporary Global Conflicts. International Journal of Sharia and Law, 1(1), 1–28. https://journal.qiyam.or.id/index.php/sharia-law/article/view/5
Halkis, M., & Waldani, I. (2024). Rethinking Nature’s Rights: An Ethical Framework for Sustainable Coexistence. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(7), 4660–4668. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mhd-Halkis-2/publication/385654335_Rethinking_Nature's_Rights_An_Ethical_Framework_for_Sustainable_Coexistence/links/672e1ea7db208342def342ea/Rethinking-Natures-Rights-An-Ethical-Framework-for-Sustainable-Coexistence.pdf
Hamidullah, M. (2024a). Islamic Environmental Ethics: A Comparative Analysis with Western Philosophies. International Journal of the Universe and Humanity in Islamic Vision and Perspective, 1(1), 77–87. https://researchcorridor.org/index.php/IJUHIVP/article/view/67
Hamidullah, M. (2024b). Islamic Environmental Ethics: A Comparative Analysis with Western Philosophies. International Journal of the Universe and Humanity in Islamic Vision and Perspective, 1(1), 77–87. https://researchcorridor.org/index.php/IJUHIVP/article/view/67
Hay, P. R. (2002). Main currents in western environmental thought. Indiana University Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=bzV1obaQ7fYC&oi=fnd&pg=PP12&dq=Western+environmental+thought+is+largely+anthropocentric&ots=STmMKSM39T&sig=okC2YL4cv6E5OuwT_J0VHQGmv98
Idllalène, S. (2021). Rediscovery and Revival in Islamic Environmental Law: Back to the Future of Nature’s Trust. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=6XUfEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR11&dq=Samira+Idllal%C3%A8ne+environmental+law.+steward,+waqff&ots=vnlTYo1tta&sig=7W10TJKITL40eXs81EyisnNsXC4
Intra-Muslim Debates on Ecology: Is Shari’a Still Relevant? In: Worldviews Volume 16 Issue 3 (2012). (2012). https://brill.com/view/journals/wo/16/3/article-p218_3.xml
Iskandar, I., & Sofuoğlu, H. (2025). Islamic environmentalism in Indonesia: An analytical study of MUI fatwas on environmental protection. Bulletin of Islamic Research, 3(2), 177–202. http://birjournal.com/index.php/bir/article/view/168
Ismail, R., Abdullah, K., & Abd Ghani, L. (2024). Biodiversity conservation efforts among muslim countries: Evidence from the organization of islamic cooperation countries. Journal of International Studies (JIS), 20(1), 83–114. https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/31250/
Kamali, M. H. (2020). Actualization (Taf’il) of the Higher Purposes (Maqasid) of Shariah. International Institute of Advanced Islamic Studies (IAIS).
Kilani, H., Serhal, A., & Llewlyn, O. (2007). Al-Hima: A way of life. IUCN West Asia Regional Office, Amman Jordan–SPNL Beirut, Lebanon. http://increate.med-ina.org/static/assets/uploads/share/Step5-tools/IUCN-and-SPNL-Al-Hima-2007.pdf
Kurtiç, E. (2022). Criminalizing environmental activism in Turkey. Middle East Briefs, 147, 1–9. https://www.academia.edu/download/94243672/Criminalizing_Environmental_Activism_in_Turkey_Kurtic2022.pdf
Liu, F. H., & Lai, K. P. (2021). Ecologies of green finance: Green sukuk and development of green Islamic finance in Malaysia. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 53(8), 1896–1914. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X211038349
Mangunjaya, F. M. (2023). How Islamic tradition benefits nature and climate change action. The Journal of the Siam Society, 111(2), 253–264. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/pub_jss/article/view/266952
Mangunjaya, F. M., & Praharawati, G. (2019a). Fatwas on boosting environmental conservation in Indonesia. Religions, 10(10), 570. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/10/570
Mangunjaya, F. M., & Praharawati, G. (2019b). Fatwas on boosting environmental conservation in Indonesia. Religions, 10(10), 570. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/10/570
Mangunjaya, F. M., & Praharawati, G. (2024). Consumption Ethics for Wild Animals: An Islamic Practice. TAFHIM: IKIM Journal of Islam and the Contemporary World, 17(1), 57–90. https://tafhim.ikim.gov.my/index.php/tafhim/article/view/224
Martin, J.-L., Maris, V., & Simberloff, D. S. (2016). The need to respect nature and its limits challenges society and conservation science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(22), 6105–6112. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525003113
Mazzaro, M. (2021). The Green Political Thought. https://unitesi.unive.it/handle/20.500.14247/8381
Moghul, U. F., & Safar-Aly, S. H. (2014). Green sukuk: The introduction of Islam’s environmental ethics to contemporary Islamic finance. Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev., 27, 1. https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/gintenlr27§ion=5
Morrison, L. (2017). Western environmental discourse in the corporate report [PhD Thesis, University of Tasmania]. https://figshare.utas.edu.au/articles/thesis/Western_environmental_discourse_in_the_corporate_report/23239511/1
Muhamad, A., Syihab, A. H., & Ibrahim, A. H. (2020). Preserving Human–Nature’s Interaction for Sustainability: Quran and Sunnah Perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(2), 1053–1066. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00192-7
Muhammad Yaseen Gada. (2024). Islam and Environmental Ethics. https://www.cambridge.org/core/elements/abs/islam-and-environmental-ethics/12DC55D258E6E49A8B4F68E5BB0A2DC3
Nasution, K. (2005). Women’s Right in the Islamic Family Law of Indonesia. Unisia, 28(56), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.20885/unisia.vol28.iss56.art10
Ndubuisi, O. G., & FNisafetyE, F. (2025). Assessing the Effectiveness of Environmental Law and Regulation: A Review of the Impacts on Environmental Degradation, Climate Change and Biodiversity Loss. https://www.seahipublications.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/IJILPS-M-10-2025.pdf
Özen, H. (2022). Interpellating ‘the people’against environmentalists: The authoritarian populist response to environmental mobilizations in Turkey. Political Geography, 97, 102695. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629822001093
Pelizzon, A., & Ricketts, A. (2015). Beyond anthropocentrism and back again: From ontological to normative anthropocentrism. Australasian Journal of Natural Resources Law and Policy, 18(2), 105–124. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/ielapa.760974676134958
Rahman, A., Hanife, M. A., Ab Halim, A. H., & Markom, R. (2022). The challenges of green sukuk policy implementation for achieving sustainable environment. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(11), e001987–e001987. https://mail.msocialsciences.com/index.php/mjssh/article/view/1987
Ramadhan, I. A. (2020). Green Sukuk issuance as an investment instrument for sustainable development. International Conference on Law, Governance and Islamic Society (ICOLGIS 2019), 95–98. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icolgis-19/125936124
Rizvi, A. M. (2010). Islamic environmental ethics and the challenge of anthropocentrism. American Journal of Islam and Society, 27(3), 53–78. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=wHI3DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA53&dq=Western+tradition+of+environmental+thought,+which+has+always+been+anthropocentric,+and+the+Islamic+ecological+jurisprudence,+which+proposes+an+alternative+way+of+thinking+about+human+and+nature.+&ots=QcKZck9Iku&sig=Z0FPXISWHkslngkffMckjFd8F5U
Rusmiati, E. T., Maryasih, N. L. K., Hutasoit, B. M., & Widoyo, H. (2023). ECOTHEOLOGY IN RELIGIOUS TEXTS: ISLAMIC, CHRISTIAN, HINDU, AND BUDDHIST PERSPECTIVES ON RESPONDING TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL CRISIS. Moestopo International Review on Social, Humanities, and Sciences, 3(2), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.32509/mirshus.v3i2.126
Saha, S. (2025). A call for transitioning to an ecocentric approach to further the sustainability paradigm focusing on nature–human relationship. Jindal Global Law Review, 16(1), 335–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41020-025-00270-6
Serhal, A., Saidi, A. R., Khatib, B., Jawhary, D., Farah, N., & Khatib, T. (2011). The Hima: An ancient conservation system from the Arabian Peninsula for the future. Culture and Wetlands in the Mediterranean: An Evolving Story, 21. https://www.academia.edu/download/97135195/Compressed_Culture_wetlands_Mediterranean_An_evolving_story.pdf#page=369
Silviana, M. P., Hartiwiningsih, & Karjoko, L. (2025). Fiqh al-Bīʾah and Restorative–Ecological Justice in Corporate Environmental Crimes. JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah), 24(2), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v24i2.16415
Smith, S. C. (2011). Crowdsourcing sharia: Digital fiqh and changing discourses of textual authority, individual reason, and social coercion. Georgetown University.
Sundus Serhan Ahmed. (2025). The Evolving Role of Sustainable Development in Shaping Political Progress: A Contemporary Islamic Perspective on Human Rights and Civil Institution | MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review. https://www.e-journal.ejournal.metrouniv.ac.id/milrev/article/view/10128
Ten Have, H., & Patrão Neves, M. D. C. (2021). Anthropocentrism (See Biocentrism; Ecocentrism; Zoocentrism). In H. Ten Have & M. D. C. Patrão Neves, Dictionary of Global Bioethics (pp. 123–124). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54161-3_58
Wani, N. H. (2024). Harmony with creation: Exploring Islamic ecological principles and environmental ethics. Journal of Novel Research in Innovation and Development, 2(5), a259–a268.
Wisesha, P. (2025). Analysis of Majelis Ulama Indonesia Fatwa on Deforestation: Implications and Relevance in the Context of Environmental Conservation. KnE Social Sciences. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&jrnl=2518668X&AN=185431778&h=aXWQfvPLfGYZ41jtaJ3Oid7Fsld1S68QwdAz6p4n2UBltpq7IyKFXpfzFe1p%2FEObWN2Nabtpu3k46McbukjQIA%3D%3D&crl=c
Yildirim, A. K. (2016). Between anti-westernism and development: Political Islam and environmentalism. Middle Eastern Studies, 52(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/00263206.2015.1124414
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aftab Haider, Naim Mathlouthi, Mahmud Zuhdi Mohd Nor, Musda Asmara, Asif Khan, Ramadhita
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
