Progressive Legal Reasoning in Contemporary Islamic Legal Reform: Negotiating the Maqāṣid and Hermeneutic Approaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v24i2.16123Keywords:
Contextual Ijtihad, Hermeneutic, Islamic Legal Reform, Maqāṣid, Progressive Legal ReasoningAbstract
This research aims to negotiate and integrate two schools of progressive legal thought in Islamic legal reform: the maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah-institutional model proposed by Asrorun Niam Sholeh, and the hermeneutic-individual model developed by Abdullah Saeed. Both emphasize the urgency of Islamic law's responsiveness to the dynamics of the times, but they depart from different epistemological frameworks. In addition, this research aims to identify the fundamental similarities and differences between the two, as well as their integration. This research employs a qualitative method, utilizing a literature review and critical discourse analysis of Asrorun's legal framework, as presented in his works and his influence on the Fatwa Commission of the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI), as well as Saeed's academic works on contextual hermeneutics. The analysis reveals that Asrorun established a legal framework grounded in maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah through a collective institutional authority framework, emphasizing reform from within the MUI by recontextualizing the classical fiqh normative framework, while remaining open to social change. Meanwhile, Saeed promotes epistemological reform through a contextual hermeneutic approach that challenges traditional epistemological structures (literal authority over texts) and provides ample space for ethical rationality for universal ethical values in ijtihad. The integration of these two approaches yields an epistemological negotiation model that bridges institutional structures and hermeneutic interpretive dynamics in the context of Islamic legal renewal. The implications of this comparison reveal both tensions and opportunities for dialogue between the internal reform model (insider reform) and a more radical methodological transformationReferences
Abdullah, A. B., Ramli, M. A., Jamaludin, M. A., & Marinsah, S. A. (2013). Postmodernism Approach in Islamic Jurisprudence (Fiqh). Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 13(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.13.1.1756
Al-Jabiri, M. (1990). Bunyah al-‘Aql al-‘Arabi. Center for Arab Unity Studies.
Anshori, A. Y., & Abdurrahman, L. T. (2025). History of the Development of Mażhab, Fiqh and Uṣūl Al-Fiqh: Reasoning Methodology in Islamic Law. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v9i1.25355
Ansori, A. (2022). Position of fatwa in Islamic law: The effectiveness of MUI, NU, and Muhammadiyah fatwas. Ijtihad : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 22(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v22i1.53-72
Asroni, A. (2021). Penafsiran Kontekstual Al-Qur’an: Telaah atas Pemikiran Abdullah Saeed. Living Islam: Journal of Islamic Discourses, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.14421/lijid.v4i1.2782
Auda, J. (2007). Maqasid al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. The International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Azra, A. (2013). Contemporary Islamic Law in Indonesia: Shari’a, Legal Pluralism, and National Law. Studia Islamika, 20(1).
Belhaj, A. (2013). The Reform Debate: Al-Marzūqī and al-Būtī on the Renewal of Usūl al-Fiqh. Ilahiyat Studies, 4(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2013.41.68
Bowen, J. R. (2003). Islam, Law, and Equality in Indonesia: An Anthropology of Public Reasoning (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615122
Bush, R. (2009). Nahdlatul Ulama and the Struggle for Power within Islam and Politics in Indonesia. ISEAS Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789812308795
Dahlan, M. (2018). The Hermeneutics of Authentic Jurisprudence Of Gus Dur In Indonesia. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 17(01), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v17i01.18
Duderija, A. (2014). Constructing a Religiously Ideal Believer and Woman in Islam. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780
Duderija, A., & Zonneveld, A. O. (2021). Transnational Progressive Islam: Theory, Networks, and Lived Experience. In Handbook of Contemporary Islam and Muslim Lives (Vol. 2, pp. 1189–1210). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32626-5_100
El Fadl, K. A. (2001). Speaking in God’s Name: Islamic Law, Authority, and Women. Oneworld Publications.
El-Mesawi, M. E.-T. (2012). From al-Shatibi’s legal hermeneutics to thematic exegesis of the Quran. Intellectual Discourse, 20(2), 189–214.
Fadel, M. (2011). Is historicism a viable strategy for Islamic law reform? The case of “never shall a folk prosper who have appointed a woman to rule them.” Islamic Law and Society, 18(2), 131–176. https://doi.org/10.1163/156851910X537793
Fahrudin. (2021). Nalar Konstruktif Maqashid Syariah Dalam Studi Hukum Islam (Sebuah Studi Pengantar dalam Ilmu Maqashid Syariah). Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum, 6(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.22515/alahkam.v6i1.3744
Faiz, M. F., Dakhoir, A., Ali, Z. Z., & Amal, M. K. (2024). Living Ihya and Harmonizing the Spiritual Essence: Sheikh Washil’s Fiqh-Sufistic as the Bedrock of Spiritually-Based Islamic Law in Nusantara. El-Mashlahah, 14(2), 431–450. https://doi.org/10.23971/el-mashlahah.v14i2.8551
Fauziah, N. (2023). The Evaluation of Maqāṣid Asy-Syarī’ah on Discourses of the Islamic Family Law. El-Usrah, 6(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v6i1.13035
Fina, L. I. N. (2011). Interpretasi Kontekstual: Studi Pemikiran Hermeneutika Al-Qur’an Abdullah Saeed. ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin, 12(1), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.14421/esensia.v12i1.707
Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and Method. Sheed & Ward. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=96qIQAAACAAJ
Hakim, M. L., Prasojo, Z. H., Masri, M. S. B. H., Faiz, M. F., Mustafid, F., & Busro, B. (2023). Between Exclusivity and Inclusivity of Institutions: Examining the Role of the Indonesian Ulema Council and Its Political Fatwa in Handling the Spread of COVID-19. Khazanah Hukum, 5(3), 230–244. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v5i3.30089
Hallaq, W. B. (2009). Sharīʿa: Theory, Practice, Transformations. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815300
Hasyim, S. (2015). Majelis Ulama Indonesia and pluralism in Indonesia. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 41(4–5), 487–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453714566547
Hefni, W., Mustofa, I., & Ahmadi, R. (2025). Looking for Moderate Fiqh: The Thought of Mohammad Hashim Kamali on the Reformation of Rigidity and Inflexibility in Islamic Law. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 10(1), 30–57. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v10i1.10694
Helmy, Y. (2022). From Islamic Modernism to Theorizing Authoritarianism: Bin Bayyah and the Politicization of the Maqāṣid Discourse. American Journal of Islam and Society, 38(3–4), 36–70. https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v38i3-4.2934
Hosen, N. (2004). Behind the Scenes: Fatwas of Majelis Ulama Indonesia (1975-1998). Journal of Islamic Studies, 15(2), 147–179. https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/15.2.147
Huda, B., Wicaksono, R. A., Agustianto, M. A., & Fadllan, F. (2025). Assessing the Legality of Cryptocurrency Trading in Indonesia’s Commodity Market: An Analytical Study Based on Maqāṣid Al-Sharīʿah. Syariah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pemikiran, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.18592/sjhp.v25i1.16759
Ifandy, T., & Hasanah, I. (2024). Maslahat (Benefits) in Fiqh Awlāwiyāt: A Comparison between Yūsuf al-Qarādhawī’s View and Abdus Salam Alī al-Karbulī’s. Al-’Adalah, 21(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v21i1.21316
Ismail, I., Salleh, N., & Nawawi, S. N. A. M. (2021). Sa’diyya Shaikh’s progressive Islamic thought and the Islamic perspective. In Gender Equality: Past, Present and Future Perspectives (pp. 103–129). Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85125022443&partnerID=40&md5=d30ba3dfc2f09e9135441cf236a50cd5
Kamali, M. H. (2003). Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence. The Islamic Texas Society.
Kamali, M. H. (2008). Shari’ah Law: An Introduction. Oneworld Publications.
Kamali, M. H. (2021). History and Jurisprudence of the Maqāṣid: A Critical Appraisal. American Journal of Islam and Society, 38(3–4), 8–34. https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v38i3-4.3110
M. Asrorun Niam Sholeh, Muhammad Fauzinudin Faiz, & Moh. Muhlis Anwar. (2022). A Critical Analysis of Islamic Law and Fatwa of MUI (Majlies Ulama Indonesia) & NU (Nahdlatul Ulama’) on A Gold-Backed Cryptocurrency (OneGram). AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial, 17(2), 506–530. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v17i2.6511
Makhlouf, A. G. (2020). Evolution of islamic law in the 20th century: The conception of collective ijtihad in the debate between muslim scholars. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 9(1), 157–178. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwaa019
Maulana, D. F., Makhrus, M., & Hasanah, H. (2022). The Urgency of MUI Halal Fatwa about Food, Beverage, Medicine, and Cosmetic Products for Consumer Protection. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 199–214. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v5i2.6421
Moustafa, T. (2013). Islamic Law, Women’s Rights, and Popular Legal Consciousness in Malaysia. Law and Social Inquiry, 38(1), 168–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2012.01298.x
Muhajir, M., Nisa’, I. S., Munawar, A., & Karimullah, S. S. (2023). Agus Moh Najib’s Thoughts on the Interconnection of Islamic Law and National Law. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, 21(1), 86. https://doi.org/10.30984/jis.v21i1.2321
MUI. (2023). Kompilasi Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia. Sekretariat MUI. https://fatwamui.com/data-fatwa
Ningsih, A. S. (2025). Reforming Islamic Family Law: The Relevance of Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah’s Concept of Legal Change. Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani, 12(1), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v12i1.7087
Nur, I., Wakhid, A. A., & Handayani, L. (2020). A Genealogical Analysis of the Concept and Development of Maqashid Syarī‘ah. Al-’Adalah, 17(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v17i1.6211
Oktiviana, N. (2023). Al-Jam’u Wa Al-Taufiq dan Naskh dalam Penyelesaian Kontradiksi Hukum Islam. JURNAL PAI: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Agama Islam, 2(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.33507/pai.v2i1.1074
Qardhawi, Y. (2001). Fiqh al-Maqasid. Dar al-Shuruq.
Rahman, F. (1982). Islam and Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition. The University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/I/bo41314165.html
Rohmanu, A., & Rofiah, K. (2023). Ṭāhā ‘Abd al-Raḥmān’s Philosophical Contribution to Theorize Ethical Maqāṣid. Al-Ahkam, 33(2), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2023.33.2.17527
Rusli, R. (2014). Progressive Salafism in online fatwa. Al-Jami’ah, 52(1), 205–229. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2014.521.205-229
Saeed, A. (2005a). Interpreting the Qur’an (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203016770
Saeed, A. (2005b). Interpreting the Qur’an: Towards a Contemporary Approach. Routledge.
Saeed, A. (2006). Islamic Thought: An Introduction. Routledge.
Saeed, A. (2017). Freedom of Religion, Apostasy and Islam (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315255002
Saeed, A. (2018). Human Rights and Islam. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784716585
Sholeh, A. N. (2024). Menghidupkan Fatwa Dinamisasi Fatwa untuk Kemaslahatan Bangsa (1st ed.). Sekretariat Komisi Fatwa.
Sholeh, M. A. N. (Ed.). (2018). Peran fatwa MUI dalam berbangsa dan bernegara: Pandangan akademisi terhadap fatwa MUI. Komisi Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI). https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/55534
Sholeh, M. A. N. (2020). Towards a Progressive Fatwa: MUI’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 20(2). https://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/ahkam/article/view/17391
Sholeh, M. A. N. (2024). Menghidupkan Fatwa Dinamisasi Fatwa Untuk Kemaslahatan Bangsa. Sekretariat Komisi Fatwa.
Takim, L. (2014). Maqāṣid al-sharī‘a in contemporary Shī’ī jurisprudence. In Maqasid Al-Shari’a and Contemporary Reformist Muslim Thought: An Examination (pp. 101–125). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137319418_5
Taufiq, M., Faiz, M. F., & Ravaşdeh, Z. (2025). Between Sharia and State: Fatwa Authority and Pandemic Responses in Indonesia, Turkey, and Morocco. De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah, 17(1), 377–394. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v17i1.31433
Tayeb, A. (2020). Islamic Education in Indonesia and Malaysia: Shaping Minds, Saving Souls. Routledge.
Whyte, S. (2023). Are Fatwas Dispensable? Examining the Contemporary Relevance and Authority of Fatwas in Australia. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 11(2–3), 314–342. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwac015
Wimra, Z., Huda, Y., Bunaiya, M., & Hakimi, A. R. (2023). The Living Fiqh: Anatomy, Philosophical Formulation, and Scope of Study. JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah), 22(1), 185. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v22i1.9491
Yusuf, N., Harun, N., & Mursyid, S. (2024). EXAMINING THE BASIS OF MAQASHID SHARIA IN RENEWAL OF ISLAMIC LAW IN INDONESIA. Petita: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah, 9(1), 357–375. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v9i1.258
Zahari, N. A. M., & Safiai, M. H. (2025). Maqasid Sharia and the Biomedical Ethics of E-Cigarettes: A Contemporary Islamic Legal Assessment. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 4(1), 295–318. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10398
Zaim, M. A., & Eldeen, A. B. (2024). Maqashid Sharia and Harmonizing Law in Indonesia: Impact on the Global Context of the SDGs. In Studies in Systems, Decision and Control (Vol. 517, pp. 745–759). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50939-1_60
Zaini, A. (2014). Model Interpretasi al-Qur’ân Abdullah Saeed. ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 6(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.15642/islamica.2011.6.1.25-36
Zayd, N. H. A., Amirpur, K., Setiawan, M. N. K., & Regeringsbeleid, W. R. voor het. (2006). Reformation of Islamic Thought: A Critical Historical Analysis. Amsterdam University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt46mt56
Zulfa, F. A., Achmad, M., Soylu, D., & Fadhil. (2025). MAPPING CONTEMPORARY ISLAMIC LEGAL THOUGHT IN INDONESIA: A DIALOG BETWEEN FIQH AND THE CULTURE OF THE ARCHIPELAGO. Al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum (JSYH), 7(1), 177–202. https://doi.org/10.20885/mawarid.vol7.iss1.art10
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Husnul Fatarib, Zezen Zainul Ali, Nur Aziz Arifin, Abdul Najib, Muhammad Nur Fathoni

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).




