Ijtihād Qaḍāʾī under Bureaucratic Governance: Judicial Practice in the Religious Court of Sungai Penuh and Padang Panjang, Indonesia

Asa'ari; Nuzul Iskandar

doi:10.31958/juris.v25i1.16603

Authors

Asa'ari Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci
Nuzul Iskandar Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v25i1.16603

Keywords:

Ijtihād qaḍāʾī, Religious Court, Judicial Reasoning, Judicial Standardization

Abstract

In the context of an increasingly standardized and bureaucratized modern judiciary, judges of Indonesia Religious Court occupy a complex position, as the judicial roles require adherence to state law while simultaneously exercising ijtihād within the Islamic legal tradition. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze how ijtihād qaḍāʾī is practiced by Religious Court judges and how judicial standardization shapes the patterns of legal reasoning. A qualitative socio-legal approach was used to evaluate judicial practice in two first-instance Religious Court in Indonesia, based on interviews, observations, and analysis of twelve divorce decisions issued in 2023. The results showed that ijtihād qaḍāʾī remains present in judicial decisions but tends to be repetitive and standardized. This was reflected in relatively uniform argumentative patterns, the dominance of formal normative references, jurisprudence, and specific qawa’id fiqhiyah, while methodological engagement with fiqh and hadith remained limited. In conclusion, judicial standardization and bureaucratization do not eliminate ijtihād qaḍāʾī but transform it into a constrained and proceduralized mode of legal reasoning. Theoretically, this study reconceptualizes ijtihād qaḍāʾī in contemporary religious court as a form of constrained normative legitimation, shaped by the logics of bureaucratic rationality and legal formalism.

References

Abubakar, F., Subeitan, S. M., Hakimi, A. R., Faisol, M., & Sinay, S. B. (2025). Qadhi Legitimization: Shifting Roles of the Penghulu in Ternate and Tidore Sultanates, Indonesia. Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 25(1), 139–163. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v25i1.139-163

Aisyah, N. (2018). Peranan Hakim Pengadilan Agama dalam Penerapan Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Al-Qadhau: Peradilan Dan Hukum Keluarga Islam, 5(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24252/al-qadau.v5i1.5665

Al-Ghazali, A. H. M. ibn A. (1992). al-Mustashfa min “Ilm al-Ushul Juz” 1. Dar al-Fikr. https://ia600207.us.archive.org/11/items/galerikitabkuningmaktabanakitabtujuh/mustasfa1.pdf

Al-Nadawi, ‘Ali Ahmad. (1994). al-Qawā’id al-Fiqhiyyah; Mafhūmuhā wa Nasy‘atuhā wa Tathawwuruhā wa Dirāsat Muallifatihā wa Adillatuhā wa Muhimmatuhā wa Tathbīquhā. Dār al-Qalam.

Al-Qaththan, M. ibn K. (2008). Mabahits fi Ulum al-Hadits (7th ed.). Maktabah al-Wahbah. https://ia802205.us.archive.org/16/items/WAQmbolqumbolqu/mbolqu.pdf

Al-Zuhaily, W. (1999). Ushul Fiqh Al Islami. Dar al-Fikr. https://www.scribd.com/doc/98395284/Ushul-Fiqh-Al-Islami-Wahbah-Zuhaili

Arifin, I. N. (2024). Peran Yurisprudensi dalam Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum di Indonesia: Kajian atas Putusan Mahkamah Agung. Yudhistira: Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum Dan Peradilan, 2(3), 68–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59966/yudhistira.v2i3.1674

Azni, A., Hafis, M., Zakariah, A. A., Harmanto, A., Miftahuddin, M., & Ihsan, M. (2025). Pseudo-Maṣlaḥah and Epistemological Failure in Marriage Dispensation at Indonesian Religious Court. Jurnal Ilmiah Peruradeun: The Indonesian Journal of the Social Sciences, 13(2), 1399–1420. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v13i2.2047

Barak, A. (2006). The Judge In A Democracy. Princeton University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7szb4

Bilalu, N., Jamal, R., Harun, N., & Subeitan, S. M. (2022). Compilation of Islamic Law as Judge’s Consideration at a Religious Court in North Sulawesi, Indonesia. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 6(2), 514–536. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i2.12441

Bowen, J. R. (2003). Islam, Law, and Equality in Indonesia: An Anthropology of Public Reasoning. Cambridge University Press.

Brown, N. J. (2009). The Rule of Law in the Arab World: Court in Egypt and the Gulf. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/rule-of-law-in-the-arab-world/97ADF4F061AA630830B7846C79C8F517

Cardozo, B. N. (2005). Nature of The Judicial Process. Cambridge University Press. https://simpus.mkri.id/opac/detail-opac?id=1859

Direktori Mahkamah Agung. (2023). Mahkamah Agung RI. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/search.html

Dworkin, R. (1986). Law is Empire. Harvard University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=WcfmEAAAQBAJ&hl=id&source=gbs_navlinks_s

Elizatun, E., Mujib, A., & Firdaus, M. N. R. C. (2025). An Examination of The Role and Significance of Quranic Arguments in Judicial Decision-Making for Sharia Economic Disputes. Hukum Islam, 25(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/hi.v25i1.37591

Epstein, L., & Weinshall, K. (2021). The Strategic Analysis of Judicial Behavior. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/strategic-analysis-of-judicial-behavior/6C26A1DA1B4EE249B00E201E3E9067C6

Fariq, M. A. M. (2025, May 16). Hakim Sebagai Birokrat: Pergeseran Fungsi Hakim dalam Peradilan Modern Indonesia dan Kritik Terhadapnya. Marinews. https://marinews.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel/pergeseran-fungsi-hakim-dalam-peradilan-modern-indonesia-0hR?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Fitri, A., Bahar, M., Azwar, Z., Ediz, M. H., & Yusrial, Y. (2024). Divorce Lawsuit Due to Impotence Perspective Maslahat Theory: Case study of the Andoolo Religious Court Decision, Southeast Sulawesi. El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 7(1), 220–236. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v7i1.21860

Friedman, L. M. (1975). The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. Russell Sage Foundation. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=pvIWAwAAQBAJ&hl=id&source=gbs_navlinks_s

Hallaq, W. B. (1984). Was the Gate of Ijtihad Closed? International Journal of Middle East Studies, 16(1), 3–41. https://www.jstor.org/stable/162939

Hallaq, W. B. (2004). Authority, Continuity and Change in Islamic Law (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiWlLXlku36AhUMcGwGHRASAF8QFnoECAgQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cambridge.org%2Fcore%2Fbooks%2Fauthority-continuity-and-change-in-islamic-law%2F4B34BC0BBD5E6EBF51CBDA4E86B

Hallaq, W. B. (2009). An Introduction to Islamic Law (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Hamid, A. (2022). Abdullah Saeed’s Progressive Ijtihad in the Application of Rechtsvinding Judges in Religious Court. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law, 5(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35719/ijil.v5i2.824

Harahap, P. H., Asmuni, A., Syahputra, A., Meidina, A. R., & Zein, A. (2023). Religious Court Decisions Regarding the Revocation of Grant (Hibah) in the Perspective of Islamic Jurisprudence. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 17(2), 233–248. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v17i2.9767

Hidayati, N. (2025). Beyond Religious Bureaucracy: Sapta Darma’s Marriage Registration Struggle in Post-constitutional Reform Indonesia. Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 25(2), 305–332. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v25i2.305-334

Hidayatullah, R. P. (2020). Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim Perspektif Maqashid Syariah. Teraju: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 2(1), 83–97. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341401616_Penemuan_Hukum_Oleh_Hakim_Perspektif_Maqashid_Syariah

Hooker, M. B. (2008). Indonesian Syariah: Defining a National School of Islamic Law. ISEAS Publishing. https://simpus.mkri.id/opac/detail-opac?id=8552

Irianto, S., Putro, W. D., Nursyamsi, F., Azhar, I., Manan, M., Hidayat, N., Faiz, E., Sukmono, H., Ilham, M., & Fatmawati, N. A. (2017). Problematika Hakim dalam Ranah Hukum, Pengadilan, dan Masyarakat di Indonesia: Studi Sosia-Legal. In Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia. Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Indonesia. https://www.komisiyudisial.go.id/storage/assets/uploads/files/Problematika-Hakim-dalam-Ranah-Hukum-Pengadilan-Masyarakat-di-Indonesia.pdf

Isnantiana, N. I. (2017). Legal Reasoning Hakim dalam Pengambilan Putusan Perkara di Pengadilan. Islamadina: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 8(2), 41–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30595/islamadina.v18i2.1920

Jalili, I., & Syukri, I. (2025). Utilizing Qawa’idh Fiqhiyah in Legal Analysis: A Review of Their Evolution and Application in Indonesian Islamic Jurisprudence. Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Dan Ekonomi Islam, 24(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20414/ijhi.v24i1.776

Kennedy, D. (1986). Freedom and Constraint in Adjudication: A Critical Phenomenology. Critical Legal Studies, 36(4), 518–562.

Khalaf, A. W. (2010). ’Ilm Uhsul al-Fiqh. Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyah.

Khori, A., Said, B., & Qulyubi, M. M. (2025). Dynamics of Islamic Legal Thought: Comparison of the Concept of Maqashid Al- sharī’ah in Madhhab Zaidiyah and Ja’fariyah. Suhuf: International Journal of Islamic Studies, 37(2), 439–447. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23917/suhuf.v37i2.11814

Langbroek, P. M. (2010). Quality Management in Court and in The Judicial Organizations in 8 Council of Europe Member States (Issue Sept). https://www.coe.int/en/web/cepej/gt-qual-tools

MacCormick, N. (1994). Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory. The Harvard Law Review Association. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/legal-reasoning-and-legal-theory-9780198763840

Merryman, J. H., & Pérez-Perdomo, R. (2018). The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin America, Fourth Edition. Stanford University Press. https://www.sup.org/books/law/civil-law-tradition

Mudzhar, M. A. (1993). Fatwa-Fatwa Majlis Ulama Indonesia: Sebuah Studi tentang Pemikiran Hukum Islam di Indonesia 1975-1988 (S. Soekarno (Ed.); Dwibahasa). INIS.

Nasution, H., & Muchtar, A. R. (2024). Negotiating Islamic Law: The Practice of Inheritance Distribution in Polygamous Marriages in Indonesian Islamic Court. 18(1), 125–144. https://doi.org/Maulana Lestari, Hadri Kusuma, Sunaryati DOI: https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v18i1.10921

Nelken, D. (2004). Using The Concept of Legal Culture. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 11(July), 1–26. https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AUJlLegPhil/2004/11.html

Nishigai, K. (2022). Two Types of Formalism of the Rule of Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 42(2), 495–520. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab039

Nurhartanto, A. (2023). Metode Penafsiran Kontekstual Al-Qur’an Dalam Perspektif Ushul Fiqih: Kajian Terhadap Ayat-Ayat Keadilan. Jurnal Pedagogy, 16(2), 1–15.

Pengadilan Agama Padang Panjang. (2024). PA Padang Panjag. https://www.pa-padangpanjang.go.id/

Pengadilan Agama Sungai Penuh. (2024). PA Sungai Penuh. https://pa-sungaipenuh.go.id/kepaniteraan/perkara/penelusuran-perkara

Posner, R. A. (2010). How Judges Think. Harvard University Press. https://simpus.mkri.id/opac/detail-opac?id=9378

Ramadhan, S., & Muslimin, J. (2022). Indonesian Religious Court Decisions on Child Custody Cases: Between Positivism and Progressive Legal Thought. Juris: Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah, 21(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v21i1.5723

Resnik, J. (1985). Managerial Judges: The Potential Costs. Public Administration Review, 45(Nov), 686–690. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3135021

Rodliyah, N., Murdiana, E., & Andreas, R. (2024). Judicial Ijtihad in Religious Court for Achieving Substantive Justice in Indonesia. Journal of Law and Regulation Governance, 2(12), 372–380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.57185/jlarg.v2i12.79

Rofii, A. (2014). Whither Islamic Legal Reasoning? The Law and Judicial Reasoning of The Religious Court. Journal of Indonesian Islam, 8(02), 235–262. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2014.8.2.235-262

Rohmawati, R., & Siddik, S. (2022). Legal Protection for Children Born out of Wedlock: Ensuring the best Interests of Children through Judge Decisions. Al-’Adalah, 19(2), 315–338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v19i2.11761

Samsarina, S., Setyawan, R., Witro, D., Ansari, P., Hariyanto, A., & Wahyudi, M. A. (2025). Dynamics of Different Religious Inheritance Decisions: The Case Study of the Religious Court Judges Ijtihad. Syariah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pemikiran, 25(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18592/sjhp.v25i1.15717

Santoso, L., Amaliyah, A., & Huda, M. (2023). Refusal of Polygamy Permit in Religious Court Decision: Criticism of Gender Justice Against Judge’s Legal Reasoning. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 23(2), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v23i2.1474

Schauer, F. (2009). Thinking Like a Lawyer: A New Introduction to Legal Reasoning. Harvard University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=xZVw0EcmYh8C&printsec=frontcover&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

Segal, J. A., & Spaeth, H. J. (2012). The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/supreme-court-and-the-attitudinal-model-revisited/5982FCCD061EB38DBB870DBC5E9A3197

Smith, S., Askew, R., Lang, E., & Smith, J. (2019). Courthouse Size and Its Impact on Judicial Performance: Insights from Weber’s Theory of Rationality. Journal of Law and Court, 7(2), 215–240. https://doi.org/10.1086/702742

Supardin, M. I., Mubarok, J., Muslimin, J., Nasril, M., & Amir, R. (2025). Legal Reasoning by Judges in the Decision of the Religious COurt in the DKI Jakarta Area Regarding Sharia Financing. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 10(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v10i1.10917

Supriyadi, S., & Suriyati, S. (2022). Judges’ Legal Culture in Dealing with High Number of Applications for Child Marriage Dispensation during Covid-19 Pandemic at the Kudus Religious Court. Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial, 17(1), 136–161. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.19105/al-Ihkam.v17i1.6060 Judges’

Suyuti, J. A. (1983). al-Asybah wa al-Nazhair fi Qawa’id wa Furu’ Fiqh al-Syafi’i. Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyah. 978-602-17662-9-3

Tamanaha, B. Z. (2017). Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global. In M. Del Mar & M. Giudice (Eds.), Legal Theory and the Social Sciences: Volume II (1st ed., pp. 447–483). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315091891

Vauchez, A. (2014). Judicialization: A sociohistorical perspective (Lessons and Questions from the French Fifth Republic). In M. R. Madsen & C. Thornhill (Eds.), Law and the Formation of Modern Europe (pp. 96–116). Cambridge University Press.

Weber, M. (2019). Economy and Society: A New Translation (K. Tribe (Ed.)). http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv24trdzh.7.

Yin, R. K. (2017). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (L. Fargotstein (Ed.); 6th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/case-study-research-and-applications/book250150

Yusuf, N., Azizah, N., & Hasan, F. (2023). Feminism Analysis of Judges’ Considerations for Post-Divorce Domestic Violence Victims in Medan and Banda Aceh Religious Court. Al-’Adalah, 20(2), 283–308. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v20i2.16177

Zaidan, A. K. (1996). al-Wajiz fi Ushul al-Fiqh. Muassasah al-Risalah. https://psqdigitallibrary.com/pustaka/index.php?p=show_detail&id=608

Zuhaily, W. M. (1986). Uhsul al-Fiqh al-Islami (1st ed.). Dar al-Fikr. https://ia600502.us.archive.org/20/items/maktabana_kutubammah3/book15.pdf