TINJAUAN ÔÇÿURF TERHADAP BUDAYA EKONOMI DALAM USAHA FOTOKOPI PERANTAU MINANGKABAU DI YOGYAKARTA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v20i1.2849Keywords:
'Urf, Budaya Ekonomi, Usaha Photo CopyAbstract
One of the efforts to meet the needs of the Minangkabau people that they achieve is through migration, as in the economic culture of Minangkabau immigrants from Nagari Atar Batusangkar, Padang Gantiang District, Tanah Datar Regency. About 99% of the imigrants were found in the field involved in Photo Copying businesses scattered in the city of Yogyakarta. The hope is that people's behavior in fulfilling the economy can continue to run well and in accordance with Islamic law. This study aims to explain how Urf's review of the economic culture of Minangkabau migrants in Yogyakarta using a qualitative descriptive research methodology. The results of the study conclude several things, among others: First, according to records in 2015 the number of Minangkabau residents in Yogyakarta reached 10,000 people or around 350 families, and those who run photocopy businesses are 80 families or 155 tablets. Second, the Economic Culture in the photocopy of the Minangkabu Community in Yogyakarta is referred to as 'Urf in Islamic law, because it fulfills several conditions' Urf and the law is mubah. Third, related to economic culture can furthermore be one of the studies that offers siding to the local community's economy which has basically been an economic support since the past in an effort to promote life, as well as' Urf which can then be used as a method and source of Islamic law in its development. economy because it conforms to Islamic principles.
References
Agusta, I. (2003). Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis Techniques. Pusat Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi. Litbang Pertanian, Bogor, 27 Pebruari 2003, 1–11.
Arsad, S., Ahmad, R., Nazjmi, W., Fisol, M., Said, R., & Haji-othman, Y. (2015). Maqasid Shariah in Corporate Social Responsibility of Shari’ah Compliant Companies. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 6(6), 239–248.
Atmadja, A. T. (2013). Methodology and Qualitative Research Struggles in the Domain of Accounting. Jurnal Akuntansi Profesi, 3(2), 122–141. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jap.v3i2
Bahri, E. S., Aslam, M. M. M., Hasan, A. A. H., & Wibowo, H. (2019). Maqasid al-Shariah in Micro-Entrepreneurs Development: an Overview. International Conference of Zakat 2019, 258–267. https://doi.org/10.37706/iconz.2019.182
Bastiar, Y., & Bahri, E. S. (2019). Model Pengkuran Kinerja Lembaga Zakat di Indonesia. ZISWAF : Jurnal Zakat Dan Wakaf, 6(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.21043/ziswaf.v1i1.5609
Čavalić, A. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility in Islam. 6th International Conference on Islam and Liberty, November, 14–15.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method. In Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Dermawan, D., & Deitiana, T. (2014). Factors that influence Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 16(2), 158–165. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34208/jba.v16i2.86
Finarti, A., & Putra, P. (2015). Implementation of Maqashid Al-Syariáh on the Implementation of Islamic Bank CSR: Case Study at PT. BRI Syariah Bank. SHARE, 4(1), 37–66. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/share.v4i1.724
Hadi, A. C. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Zakat in Islamic Economic Law Perspective. Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 16(2), 229–240. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.15408/ajis.v16i2.4453
Hadi, K. (2012). Implementation of Maqashid Syariah as an Indicator of Islamic Companies. Jurnal Al-Azhar Indonesia Seri Pranata Sosial, 1(3), 140–150.
Hadi, N. (2011). Interaction of Social Responsibility, Social Performance, Financial Performance, and Extent of Social Disclosure (Test the Motive Behind Corporate Social Responsibility Going public in Indonesia). MAKSIMUM, 1(2), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.26714/mki.v1i2.247
Hussein, A. (2009). The use of Triangulation in Social Sciences Research: Can qualitative and quantitative methods be combined? Journal of Comparative Social Work, 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31265/jcsw.v4i1.48
Kamil, A., & Herusetya, A. (2012). Effect of Company Characteristics on the Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility Activities. Media Riset Akuntansi, 2(1), 1–17.
Kara, M. (2012). Al-Syatibi’s Thoughts on Maslahah and Its Implementation in Sharia Economic Development. Jurnal Assets, 2(2), 173–184.
Kriyantono, R. (2015). Public Relations and Corporate Social Responsibility in Mandatory Approach Era in Indonesia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211(September), 320–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.041
Kusumo, J. M. T., & Juniarti. (2015). Pengaruh Corporate Social Reponsibility Terhadap Respon Investor Dalam Sektor Industri Barang Konsumsi. Business Accounting Review, 3(1), 212–222.
Maqbool, S., & Zameer, M. N. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: An empirical analysis of Indian banks. Future Business Journal, 4(1), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbj.2017.12.002
Marnelly, T. R. (2012). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Tinjauan Teori dan Praktek di Indonesia. Jurnal Aplikasi Bisnis, 2(2), 49–59.
Masoud, N. (2017). How to win the battle of ideas in corporate social responsibility : the International Pyramid Model of CSR. Masoud International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-017-0015-y
Mihriban, C. A., & Harun, K. (2017). The Corporate Sustainability Solution: Triple Bottom Line. The Journal of Accounting and Finance, July, 18–34.
Mitra, N., & Schmidpeter, R. (2020). Mandated Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from India. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24444-6 ©
Nayenggita, G. B., Raharjo, S. T., & Resnawaty, R. (2019). Praktik Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) di Indonesia. Jurnal Pekerjaan Sosial, 2(1), 61–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24198/focus.v2i1.23119
Nugroho, L., Utami, W., Sanusi, Z. M., & Setiyawati, H. (2018). Corporate Culture and Financial Risk Management in Islamic Social Enterprises (Indonesia Evidence). International Journal of Commerce and Finance, 4(2), 12–24.
Purwanto, A. (2011). Effect of Industry Type, Company Size, Profitability on Corporate Social Responsibility. Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing, 8(1), 12–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/jaa.8.1.12-29
Putri, A. K., Sudarma, M., & Purnomosidhi, B. (2016). Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Company Value with Company Size and Number of Board of Commissioners as Moderating Variables (Study of Manufacturing Companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange). Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen (JAM), 14(2). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10. 18202/ jam23026332.14.2.16
Putri, R. A., & Christiawan, Y. J. (2014). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Likuiditas, dan Leverage terhadap Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility (Studi pada Perusahaan-Perusahaan yang Mendapat Penghargaa ISRA dan Listed (Go-Publik) di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) 2010-2012). Business Accounting Review, 2(1), 61–70.
Saifi, M. (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility Manufaturing Company in Indonesia. Journal of Applied Management (JAM), 18(2), 383–390. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10. 21776/ub.jam.2020.018.02.19
Salman, S. (2014). Ethics & Governance (Issue July). Chartered Islamic Finance Professional (CIFP) INCEIF – The Global University of Islamic.
Schurink, W. J. (2003). Qualitative Research In Management And Organisational Studies With Reference To Recent South African Research. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 1(3), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v1i3.25
Syafii, M., Sanrego, Y. D., & Taufiq, M. (2012). An Analysis of Islamic Banking Performance : Maqashid Index Implementation in Indonesia and Jordania. Journal of Islamic Finance, 1(1), 12–29.
Tarique1, K. M., Ahmed, M. U., Hossain, D. M., & Momen, M. A. (2017). Maqasid al-Shariah in CSR Practices of the Islamic Banks: A Case Study of IBBL. Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking and Finance, 13(3), 47–63.
Türker, D. (2015). Contrasting Instrumental Views on Corporate Social Responsibility: Short-term Versus Long-term Profit Orientation Approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 568–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.128
Wuttichindanon, S. (2017). Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences Corporate social responsibility disclosure d choices of report and its determinants: Empirical evidence from fi rms listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(2), 156–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.07.002
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Mahlil Bunaiya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
