KEBIJAKAN PEMBERDAYAAN WAKAF UANG DI KABUPATEN TANAH DATAR

Elimartati Elimartati

doi:10.31958/juris.v16i2.976

Authors

Elimartati Elimartati Fakultas Syariah Islam IAIN Batusangkar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v16i2.976

Keywords:

wakafuang, kebijakan, pemberdayaan

Abstract

This research analyzes the policy of local government and people of Tanah Datar Regency in exploiting its potential, opportunity, human resources and challenges in increasing money waqf empowerment. The research method used was qualitative. The techniques used in collecting empirical data in the field were interviews and documentation. The findings of the research indicate that the guidelines for implementation of waqf and can be used as a foothold in the management and empowerment of money waqf. The potential of empowerment of money waqf in Tanah Datar Regency can be enhanced by strengthening the wakaf regulation in the regions, establishment of business partners, strengthening the quality of human resources with sharia insight, and adequate financial support. Policy can be done by cooperating with various parties, such as local government, syariah financial institutions (LKS), non-governmental organizations (NGOs), companies and others.

References

Zhang, D., Zhao, J. L., Zhou, L., & Nunamaker Jr, J. F. (2004). Can elearning replace classroom learning?. Communications of the ACM, 47(5), 7579.

Carlile, O., & Jordan, A. (2005). It works in practice but will it work in theory? The theoretical underpinnings of pedagogy. Emerging Issues in the Practice of University Learning and Teaching. Dublin: AISHE, 11-26.

Woolfolk, A.E. (1998). Educational psychology (7th ed.) United State: Allyn & Bacon.

Mager, R. F., & Peatt, N. (1962). Preparing instructional objectives (Vol. 962). Belmont, CA: Fearon Publishers.

Gagné, R. M., & Medsker, K. (1996). The conditions of learning. New York: Harcourt Brace.

Shuell, T. J. (1986). Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review of educational research, 56(4), 411-436.

Anderson, J.R. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications (4th ed.), New York: Freeman.

Bandura, D. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [9] Farnham-Diggory, S. (1994). Paradigms of knowledge and instruction. Review of Educational Research, 64, 463-477.

Piaget, J. (19630. Origins of intelligence in children. New York: Norton.

Carlile, O., Jordan, A., & Stack, A. (2004). Learning by Design: Learning Theory for the Designer of Multimedia Educational Materials. WIT/BBC Online: Waterford, Ireland.

Buzan, T. (1996). Use your head, 1974. BBC Publication, London.

Lunsford, A. (2003). Cognitive development and the basic writer. Crosstalk in comp theory: A reader, 299-310.

Odell, L. (1973). Teaching reading: An alternative approach. English Journal, 454-488.

Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. Vygotskian approaches to second language research, 33456.

Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.

Chang, S. L., & Ley, K. (2006). A learning strategy to compensate for cognitive overload in online learning: Learner use of printed online materials. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 5(1), 104-117.

Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1992). The split‐ attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62(2), 233-246.

Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A duel coding approach. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Koretsky, M. D., Amatore, D., Barnes, C., & Kimura, S. (2008). Enhancement of student learning in experimental design using a virtual laboratory. Education, IEEE Transactions on, 51(1), 76-85.

Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education Next, 12(1), 82-83.