English Language Teaching Management Strategies to Improve StudentsÔÇÖ Higher Order Thinking Skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31958/jaf.v9i1.2738Keywords:
Higher order thinking skills, learning management system, motivationAbstract
This study aimed to assess, explore and describe management strategies to improve studentsÔÇÖ HOTS in English practice. Research was focused on planning, implementing, and evaluating in improving English learning. This study used descriptive qualitative research, the subjects were owners of the event organizer, students, and volunteer. Data collection techniques used observation, interviews and documentation. The results showed that planning was written in the guidebook and arranged based on need analysis that has been done. Implementation was tuning in planning project, HOTS implementation activities in junior high schools were more concerned on students' confidence level in English communication and the application of HOTS in the real world. Meanwhile, the application of HOTS in Senior high school was more emphasis on critical thinking and problem-solving. The evaluation was divided into two parts, the evaluation of participants was to measure the achievement level of learning and evaluation of activities was measuring for the improvement of the event.
References
Cooper, J. M. & Allen, D. M. (1971). Microteaching: History and present status. California Education Resource Information Centre Clear. Teaching Education.
Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 J.1, 2–18
Ellis, R., Loewen, S. & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and Explicit Corrective Feedback and the Acquisition of L2 Grammar. Stud. Second Lang. Acquis.28, 339–368
Han, Z. H. (2002). Rethinking the Role of Corrective Feedback in Communicative Language Teaching. RELC Journal. 33, 1-34 doi. 10.1177/003368820203300101. Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Rev. Educ. Res.77, 81–112
Liu, N. & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teach. High. Educ.11, 279–290.
Nguyen, T. T. M. (2008). Criticizing in an L2 : Pragmatic strategies used by Vietnamese EFL learners. Intercultural Pragmatics.5, 41–66
Nguyen, T. T. M. (2008). L2 criticisms: How learners do it? Journal of Pragmatics. 40, 1–33
Orlich, D., Harder, R., Callahan, R., Trevisan, M. & Brown, A. (2010). Teaching Strategies: A Guide to Effective Instruction. Wadsworth.
Rahmat, R. B. (2013). Peer Feedback : a Case Study of Assessment for Learning in a Singaporean Classroom. GSE Journal of Education 64-87
Şen, A. I. (2010). Effects of peer teaching and microteaching on teaching skills of pre-service physics teachers Egit. ve Bilim 35, 78–88
Skakunova, V.A. (2017). Microteaching As a Method of Teaching Professional Skills for PreService Language Teachers (on the Example of Professional Course for Bachelor Students). Bull. South Ural State Univ. Ser. "Education. Educ. Sci.9, 97–101
Tracy, K. & Eisenberg, E. (2009). Giving criticism: A multiple goals case study. Res. Language Society Interaction. 24, 37–70
Wilson, G. & I’Anson, J. (2006). Reframing the practicum: Constructing performative space in initial teacher education. Teaching Education
Zher, N. H., Hussein, R. M. R. & Saat, R. M. (2016). Enhancing Feedback via Peer Learning in Large Classrooms. Malaysian Online Journal Educational Technology.4, 1–16
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Mega Selvi Maharani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
