KEMUNDURAN DAN KEHANCURAN DINASTI ABBASIYAH SERTA DAMPAKNYA TERHADAP DUNIA ISLAM KONTEMPORER

Authors

  • Muhammad Amin Dosen UIN Raden Fatah Palembang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31958/jeh.v1i1.340

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of the destruction of the Abbasid dynasty to the contemporary Islamic world. Abbasid dynasty setbacks caused by two factors, namely internal and external. Internal factors are the most dominant influence on deterioration of the Abbasid dynasty, which for Muslims to leave their religion. While external factors are the most dominant influence on deterioration of the Abbasid dynasty, namely: the Crusades and the Mongol army raid into the torritery of Islam. The impact of the destruction of the Abbasid dynasty to the contemporary Islamic world seen from the aspect of science, politics and economics. In the aspect of science, after the fall of the Abbasid Muslims are always behind in the field of science against the West. In the political aspect, when the Muslims led by a king who was a Syamanism (worshipers of sun) is Khulagu Khan, and the contemporary period the loss of the power of Islam as a superpower. Muslims are fragmented, Muslims colonized by the West, there is no caliphate. Meanwhile, in the economic field, after the fall of the Abbasid Muslims suffered poverty and the economy dominated by Western nations today.

Keywords: Collapse, Abbasid Dynasty, Conteparary Islamic world

Author Biography

Muhammad Amin, Dosen UIN Raden Fatah Palembang

Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Batusangkar

 

References

Afwah, Neneng. (2010) “Teologi

Transformatif Upaya Membebaskan Kaum Tertindas (Studi atas Pemikiran Moeslim Abdurrahman)”. Antologi Kajian Islam. Vol. 15, No. 1.

A’la, Abd. (2007). “Konflik Kekerasan; Antara Politisasi Agama, Etnisitas, dan Politik Kekuasaan”. Paramedia. Vol. 8, No. 3.

Awwas, Irfan S. (ed.). (2001). Risalah Kongres Mujahidin dan Penegakan Syari’ah Islam. Yogyakarta: Wihdah Press.

Bagir, Zainal Abidin. (2010). et al. Laporan Tahunan Kehidupan Beragama di Indonesia 2010. Yogyakarta: CRCS.

Bagir, Zainal Abidin. (2012). et al. Laporan Tahunan Kehidupan Beragama di Indonesia 2011. Yogyakarta: CRCS.

Bertrand, Jacques. (2004). Nationalism and Ethnic Conlict in Indonesia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Coser, Louis. (1956). The Functions of Social Conlict. New York: Free Press. Dwi R, Agnes. (2011). et al. Laporan Kondisi Kebebasan Beragama/ berkeyakinan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Pustaka Masyarakat Setara, 2012.

Effendi, Djohan. (1994). “Konsep-Konsep

Teologis” dalam Budhy MunawarRachman (ed.) Kontekstualisasi Doktrin Islam dalam Sejarah. Jakarta: Paramadina.

Fauzi, Ihsan Ali (2009). et al., Laporan Penelitian Pola-pola Konlik Keagamaan di Indonesia (1990-2008). Jakarta: Yayasan Wakaf Paramadina (YWP), Magister Perdamaian dan Resolusi Konflik, Universitas Gadjah Mada (MPRKUGM), The Asia Foundation (TAF).

Francis, Diana. (2005). Teori Dasar

Transformasi Konlik Sosial. Yogyakarta: Quilis.

Hamdi, Ahmad Zainul. (2012). “Klaim

Religious Authority dalam Konflik SunniSyi’i Sampang Madura”. ISLAMICA.

Vol. 6, No. 2.

Handoko, Imam Priyo. (2006). “Upaya

Menjadikan Dunia Lebih Indah”. Kompas. Rabu 15 Februari 2006. Hasani, Ismail. (2010). Wajah Para Pembela Islam. Jakarta: Pustaka Masyarakat Setara.

Ja’far, Suhermanto. (2005). “Agama, Konflik, Integrasi dan Masyarakat Komunikatif”. dalam Thoha Hamim. Khoirun Niam dan Akh. Muzakki (ed.), Resolusi Konlik Islam Indonesia. Yogyakarta: LKiS dan LSAS IAIN Sunan Ampel. Liliweri, Alo, Prasangka & Konlik: Komunikasi Lintas Budaya Masyarakat Multikultur, Jogjakarta: LKiS.

Miall, Hugh, Oliver Rombos. (1999). Tom Tom Woodhouse, Contemporary Conlict Resolution. USA: Polity Press. Rahman,

Fazlur. (1993). “Hukum dan Etika dalam Islam”. Al-Hikmah, No. 9.

Rahman, Fazlur. (1994). “Prinsip Syura dan Peranan Umat Islam”. dalam Mumtaz Ahmad (ed.). Masalah-Masalah Teori

Politik Islam, terj. Erni Hadi, ceta. ke-2. Bandung: Penerbit Mizan.

Ridwan. (2009). “Piagam Madinah dan Resolusi Konflik: Model Penataan Hubungan Antar Umat Beragama”. HARMONI Jurnal Multikultural &

Multireligius. Vol. VIII, No. 30.

Ritzer, George. (1985). Sosiologi Ilmu Pengetahuan Berparadigma Ganda. terj. Alimandan, Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Rubin, Jeffrey Z, Dean G. (1994). Pruit dan Sung Hee Kim, Social Conlict: Escalation, Stalemate and Settlement. United States of America: McGraw-Hill, Inc.

Shofan, Moh. (2006). Jalan Ketiga Pemikiran Islam: Mencari Solusi Perdebatan Tradisionalisme dan Liberalisme.

Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD.

Susanto, Astrid S. (1985). Pengantar Sosiologi dan Perubahan Sosial. Jakarta: Binacipta.

Tacci, Nathalie. (2004). “Conflict Resolution in the European Neigborhod: The Role the EU as a Framework and as an Actor”. EUI Working Paper, Italy: Ueropean University Institute.

Tim Penyusun. (2010). Laporan Kebebasan Beragama/ Berkeyakinan dan Toleransi. Jakarta: the Wahid Institute.

------- (2011). Lampu Merah Kebebasan Beragama: Laporan Kebebasan Beragama dan Toleransi di Indonesia 2011. Jakarta: The Wahid Institute.

Veerger, K. J. (1993). Realitas Sosial: Releksi

Filsafat Sosial atas Hubungan IndividuMasyarakat dalam Cakrawala Sejarah

Sosiologi; Seri Filsafat Atma Jaya. cet. ke-

Jakarta: Gramedia.

Windu, I Marsana. (1992). Kekuatan dan Kekerasan menurut John Galtung. Yogyakarta: Kanisius. Yusuf, Slamet Effendy. (2011) “Review 5 Tahun Kehidupan Umat Beragama di Indonesia:

Perspektif MUI”. Makalah pada Kongres FKUB di Jakarta, 21-22 November.

Published

2016-12-28

How to Cite

Amin, M. (2016). KEMUNDURAN DAN KEHANCURAN DINASTI ABBASIYAH SERTA DAMPAKNYA TERHADAP DUNIA ISLAM KONTEMPORER. El -Hekam, 1(1), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.31958/jeh.v1i1.340

Issue

Section

Articles