The JudgeÔÇÖs Considerations in Refusing an Application for Marriage Dispensation in Respect of Very Urgent Reasons
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31958/jeh.v8i1.9181Keywords:
JudgeÔÇÖs Considerations, Marriage Dispensation, Urgent ReasonsAbstract
The stateÔÇÖs indecisiveness in defining a very urgent reason clause on a marriage dispensation application at the Religious Court opens opportunities for judges to have different views in granting or rejecting a case. The essence of the very urgent reasons regulated in Law Number 16 of 2019 concerning Marriage should ideally be a barometer for judgesÔÇÖ considerations to determine the readiness of children to enter into marriage. This study aims to reveal the judgesÔÇÖ considerations in defining the very urgent reasons for the determination of law in the Bukittinggi Religious Court which are contradictory between one judge and another judge. This research departs from normative legal research based on legal documents. The approach used is a statute approach which is side by side with a qualitative approach by emphasizing on the analysis of data obtained through legal documents in the form of copies of the case for the determination of the legal dispensation of marriage at the Bukittinggi Religious Court. The results of this study prove that the judgeÔÇÖs powers and considerations in a marriage dispensation request with very urgent reasons produce a different output in the form of a legal determination. The judge granted case Number 26/Pdt.P/2023/PA.Bkt and rejected case Number 22/Pdt.P/2023/PA.Bkt. This phenomenon shows that the basic considerations of judges depart from various legal sources while still taking into account juridical, philosophical and sociological aspects based on the values that live in society
References
Budyatmojo, Penegakkan Hukum Tindak Pidana Illegal Loging (Antara Harapan Dan Kenyataan), Jurnal Yustisia Volume.2 Nomor 2 Mei - Agustus 2013.
Romli Atmasasmita, Reformasi Hukum, Hak Asasi Manusia & Penegakan Hukum, Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2001, hlm. 55
Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro, Perspektif Sosial dalam Pemahaman Masalah-Masalah Hukum, CV Agung, Semarang, 1989, hlm. 23
Suteki, Rekonstruksi Politik Hukum Tentang Hak Menguasai Negara Atas Sumber Daya Air Berbasis Nilai Keadilan Sosial (Studi Privatisasi Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Air), Disertasi pada Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Universitas Diponegoro Semarang, 2008
Soerjono Soekanto, Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2008, hlm. 8
Sudarto, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, Penerbit P.T. Alumni, Bandung, 2010, Hlm.113
Wawan Muhwan Hairi, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Pustaka Setia, Bandung, 2012, hlm. 22
Winarno Budiatmodjo. Penegakkan Hukum Tindak Pidana Illegal Loging (Antara Harapan Dan Kenyataan), Jurnal. Yustisia Volume 2 Nomor 2 Mei - Agustus 2013
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ashabul Fadhli
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:?á
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
