AN AN AUDIT IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURES FOR ACCOUNT RECEIVABLE AT PT XYZ BY YANISWAR PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT AND PARTNER
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31958/jaksya.v5i2.16364Abstract
This study aims to analyze the procedures for auditing accounts receivable at PT XYZ conducted by KAP Yaniswar and Rekan Pekanbaru, with particular emphasis on compliance with Auditing Standards (SA) 300, SA 315, SA 320, SA 330, and SA 505. The research employs a descriptive qualitative approach using interviews, observations, and documentation techniques. The findings indicate that the audit process was carried out systematically, encompassing audit planning, risk assessment, substantive testing, and external confirmation, and was supported by a layered audit quality control system involving review by junior auditors, supervisors, and audit partners. Although the overall implementation of the audit procedures complied with the applicable Auditing Standards and provided reasonable assurance regarding the fairness of accounts receivable balances, this study identifies certain limitations, particularly in the depth of risk analysis and the suboptimal response rate to external confirmations. Therefore, this study recommends strengthening the risk-based audit approach and enhancing the effectiveness of external confirmation procedures to improve audit quality, especially within small and medium-sized public accounting firms.
References
Arens, A. A. (2017). Auditing and Assurance Services. Pearson Education.
Alzeban, A., & Sawan, N. (2015). The impact of audit committee characteristics on the implementation of internal audit recommendations. International Journal of Auditing, 19(2),110–127.
Amran, E. F., Angrariani, A., Rahmi, M., & Candra, R. (2024). Analisis Perencanaan Audit Laporan
Keuangan Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik (KAP) Griselda, Wisnu Dan Arum. TAMWIL: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 10(1), 29-41.
Glover, S. M., Taylor, M. H., & Wu, Y. J. (2017). Current practices and challenges in auditing revenue and related accounts. The Accounting Review, 92(4), 155–178.
Gunawan, I. (2015). Prinsip dan Praktik Audit Keuangan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
IAPI. (2024). Standar Audit (SA) 300–505. Jakarta: Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia.
Kieso, D. E., Weygandt, J. J., & Warfield, T. D. (2019). Intermediate Accounting. Wiley.
Messier, W. F., Martinov-Bennie, N., & Eilifsen, A. (2019). Auditors’ judgment and decision making.Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 38(4), 1–26.
Mulyadi. (2016). Auditing. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Putra, R. A., & Nugroho, P. I. (2021). Kualitas audit dan penerapan standar audit pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 12(2), 265–282.
Putri, A. (2016). Efektivitas Prosedur Audit terhadap Pengendalian Piutang Usaha. Jurnal Akuntansi Indonesia, 8(2), 55–67.
Sari, D. P., & Fitriani, A. (2020). Pengaruh pengendalian internal terhadap risiko salah saji material dalam audit laporan keuangan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, 24(1), 45–58.
Sinaga, F. (2024). Etika Audit dan Akuntabilitas dalam Perspektif Syariah. Jurnal Akuntansi Syariah, 12(1), 23–34.
Budianto, R. (2024). Penerapan SPAP pada Audit Keuangan Syariah. Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 14(2),112–125.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fadhlil Azhim Alda, Elsa Fitri Amran, Elfina Yenti

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.





