The Implementation of Diversion for Juvenile Offenders in Indonesia on Fiqh Jinayah Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31958/jisrah.v7i02.16987Abstrak
This study examines the implementation of diversion for juvenile offenders from
the perspective of fiqh jināyah. Diversion is a mechanism for resolving juvenile
criminal cases by transferring the settlement process from the formal criminal justice
system to alternative processes outside the court system. The increasing number of children
involved in criminal offenses necessitates special attention regarding their criminal
responsibility. This research employed a qualitative method with a sociological approach.
Data were collected through interviews with law enforcement officers and social institutions,
as well as through the examination of legal documents and relevant scholarly articles. The
findings indicate that the implementation of diversion is consistent with the concept of
criminal responsibility for children in fiqh jināyah. However, its implementation has not
yet been optimal. This is reflected in the relatively low rate of case resolution through
diversion mechanisms. The limited effectiveness of diversion is influenced by several factors,
including the low level of public understanding, the unequal availability of facilities and
infrastructure such as LPKA, LPKS, and Rehabilitation Centers, as well as the
insufficient understanding of diversion among law enforcement officials. Therefore,
comprehensive evaluation and public education across various sectors are necessary to
enhance understanding and improve the success rate of diversion implementation.
Referensi
Adi, K. (2014). Kebijakan Kriminal dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Pustaka Pelajar.
Afini, A. (2025). Mengupas Esensi Diversi Partisipasi Masyarkaat dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.
Kemenimipas.Go.Id.
Amalin, H., & Widjajanti, E. (2025). Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Anak Melalui Penerapan
Restorative Justice di Indonesia. Locus Journal of Academic Literatirue Review, 4(2), 69–79.
Artadi, I. (2007). Dekonstruksi Pemahaman Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Melalui Prosedur
Perdamaian Menuju Proses Peradilan Pidana Rekonsiliatif. Jurnal Hukum Pro Justisia, 25(1), 30
Audah, A. Q. (2007). Ensiklopedi Hukum Pidana Islam (At-Tasyri’ al-Jina’i al-Islami) (T. T. Tsalis (ed.);
Jilid I). Tsalis.
Darmawan, J. B., Suhariadi, F., Widjojo, S., Amiati, M., & Abdullah, A. H. (2025). Incorporating Islah
Principles into Restorative Justice: Bridging Contemporary Legal Practice and Islamic Values.
Milrev: Metro Islamic Law Reiew, 4(1), 269–294.
Dawud,
A.
(2009).
Sunan
Abi
Dawud:
https://hadeethenc.com/id/browse/hadith/58148
Kitab
al-Hudud.
Hadits.Id.
Djamil, M. N. (2015). Anak Bukan untuk Dihukum : Catatan Pembahasan UU Sistem Peradilan Pidana
Anak (UU-SPPA ) (ketiga). Sinar Grafika.
Erlangga, G., Marlina, & Affan, I. (2023). Analisis Teori Pemidanaan Terhadap Anak Yang
Berkonflik Dengan Hukum Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Dan Kemasyarakatan Al-Hikmah, 4(1),
–193.
Friedman, L. M. (1975). The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. Russel Sage Foundation.
Hanifah, A., Nasa, R., & Hafiz, M. A. (2025). Analisis Madzhab Syaf ’ i Dan Hanafi Tentang Batasan
Usia Perkawinan. Al Muqaranah : Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum Dan Mazhab, 3(1), 14–29.
Janah, K. (2020). Sanksi Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan Oleh Anak Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana
Islam. Ta’zir: Jurnal Hukum Pidana, 4(2), 75–94.
Kartono, K. (2009). Patologi Sosial 2: Kenakalan Remaja. Rajawali Press.
Muladi. (1995). Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Pertiwi, & Andaryuni, L. (2024). Faktor Penyebab Anak Menjadi Pelaku Kejahatan. Bulletin of
Community Engagement, 4(3), 710–717.
Politis, S., Sivasubramaniam, D., Gogan, T., & Papalia, N. (2025). Lay understanding and perceptions
of child protection: Limited awareness of restorative principles. Child Protection and Practice, 4,
–12.
Purba, Y. Y., Silalahi, J. A. S., Nasution, M. F., & Purba, V. L. (2025). Peran Restorative Justice Dalam
Penyelesaian Kasus Tindak Pidana Anak di Indonesia. Peshum: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial Dan
Humaniora, 4(2), 1923–1930. http://digilib.iblam.ac.id/id/eprint/1225
Sabiq, S. (1988). Fiqh al-Sunnah (terj. Kama). PT. Al-Ma’arif.
Subekti. (1955). Dasar-Dasar Hukum dan Pengadilan. Soeroengan.
Sugama, F., Rahmad, Y., Az, M. R., Ridwan, M. A., Rozi, F., Azis, A., & Jum’ah, J. (2024). Efektivitas
Penerapan Restorative Justice dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Anak di Indonesia. Jimmi:
Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Multidisiplin, 1(3), 306–316. https://doi.org/10.71153/jimmi.v1i3.148
##submission.downloads##
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Dicha Fadilla Fadilla, Asep Saepullah
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a?áCreative Commons Attribution License?áthat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See?áThe Effect of Open Access).
