The Effectiveness of Mauro Method Qur'an Memorization: A Study on Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders

Risca Amani; Rahmahtrisilvia Rahmahtrisilvia; Arisul Mahdi; Afdal Luthfi; Fitri Maulidazani; Vikri Aflaha Qomari; Azmil Umur

doi:10.31958/jt.v27i1.10303

Authors

Risca Amani Universitas Negeri Padang http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9850-6380
Rahmahtrisilvia Rahmahtrisilvia Universitas Negeri Padang http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3012-3103
Arisul Mahdi Universitas Negeri Padang http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6785-4866
Afdal Luthfi Universitas Negeri Padang http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2029-7182
Fitri Maulidazani Universitas Negeri Padang
Vikri Aflaha Qomari Universitas Negeri Padang
Azmil Umur Universitas Negeri Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v27i1.10303

Keywords:

MauroÔÇÖs Method, Tahfidz Learning, Autism Spectrum Disorders

Abstract

Everyone has the right to study and memorize the Qur'an, including children with autism spectrum disorders. Despite having difficulty communicating, autistic children can to memorize the Quran by applying various methods, such as Mauro. The Mauro method is a combination of the method of memorizing the Qur'an by listening, seeing, and repeating. The purpose of this study is to see impact of the application of the Mauro method in helping the process of memorizing the Qur'an for children with autism spectrum disorders, especially in short surahs. The type of research used is an experiment in the form of Single Subject Research (SSR) with an A-B-A design. The study was conducted in 14 meetings with 3 subjects. The results of the data analysis proved that the ability to read short surahs in autistic children increased because of the intervention given, namely the Mauro method. The continuous application of the Mauro method can assist in the process of memorizing short surahs for children with autism spectrum disorders.

┬á

References

Aflaha, A., Purbaya, D., Juheri, D., & Barlian, U. C. (2021). Analisis Standar Pembiayaan Pendidikan. Masile, 2(1), 24-59.

Ahmad, M., Ahmed, Z., Yang, X., Hussain, N., & Sinha, A. (2022). Financial development and environmental degradation: Do human capital and institutional quality make a difference? Gondwana Research, 105, 299-310.

Akhmedov, B. A. (2021). Innovative cluster model for improving the quality of educatio. Academic Research in Educational Sciences, 2(3), 528-534.

Charmaz, K., & Thornberg, R. (2021). The pursuit of quality in grounded theory. Qualitative research in psychology, 18(3), 305-327.

Cochran-Smith, M. (2021). Rethinking teacher education: The trouble with accountability. Oxford Review of Education, 47(1), 8-24.

De Rus, G. (2021). Introduction to cost–benefit analysis: looking for reasonable shortcuts. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Gándara, D., & Daenekindt, S. (2022). Accountability or Equity: Combining Topic Models and Qualitative Analysis to Examine Public Rhetoric about Performance-Based Funding. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis.

Helda, H., & Syahrani, S. (2022). National Standards of Education in Contents Standards and Education Process Standards in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Education (INJOE), 3(2), 257-269.

Heyneman, S. P. (2022). When models become monopolies: The making of education policy at the World Bank. In Education Policies in the 21st Century (pp. 35-55). Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hutchings, M. (2021). Accountability, social justice and educational research. In Educational research for social justice (pp. 45-78). Cham: Springer.

Juanda, J. (2021). ANOMALI ANGGARAN PENDIDIKAN DALAM PENGATURAN DAN PRAKTEK. Dharmasisya, 1(2), 18.

Kang, E., & Lee, H. (2021). Employee compensation strategy as sustainable competitive advantage for HR education practitioners. Sustainability, 13(3), 1049.

Khasanova, G. K. (2021). Main trends in the development of education and professional training in the world. Oriental renaissance: Innovative, educational, natural and social sciences, 1(1), 257-262.

Kisno, K., Sumaryanto, S., & Darwin, D. (2021). Pembiayaan Pendidikan dan Kualitas Pendidikan di SMK Swasta Methodist Tanjung Morawa. Cakrawala, 15(2), 217-226.

Knight, D. S., & Skrtic, T. M. (2021). Cost-effectiveness of instructional coaching: Implementing a design-based, continuous improvement model to advance teacher professional development. Journal of School Leadership, 31(4), 318-342.

Macheridis, N., & Paulsson, A. (2021). Tracing accountability in higher education. Research in education, 110(1), 78-97.

Matete, R. E. (2021). Teaching profession and educational accountability in Tanzania. Heliyon, 7(7), e07611.

Nogueira, M., & Madaleno, M. (2021). New evidence of Competitiveness based on the global competitiveness index. Econ. Bull, 41, 788-797.

Pamuji, S., & Wiyani, N. A. (2021). Manajemen Pembiayaan Pendidikan yang Berbasis ICT. Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 6(1).

Sofyan, Y., & Barlian, U. C. (2021). ANALISIS PEMBIAYAAN PENDIDIKAN (Suatu Kajian Praktis Dalam Pengeloaan Anggaran Pendidikan Di Sekolah Menengah Umum). Jurnal Ilmiah MEA (Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi), 5(1), 221-239.

Sudarmono, S., Hasibuan, L., & Us, K. A. (2021). Pembiayaan Pendidikan. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial, 2(1), 266-280.

Sutarman, S., Hartati, Y. S., & Dewi, P. A. (2020). Measurement of Educational Feasibility Using Cost and Benefit Analysis at STAINU Temanggung. IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application), 3(1), 59-68.

Wicaksono, J. A. (2021). Kebijakan Pendidikan Nasional Perspektif Pembiayaan Pendidikan. An-Nuha: Jurnal Kajian Islam, Pendidikan, Budaya dan Sosial, 8(2), 375-407.

Wirian, O., Agustina, N., & Siahaan, A. (2022). Model-Model Pembiayaan Pendidikan. Educate: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 1(1), 44-56.