THE ROLE OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT AS A POSITIVE LEGISLATOR IN THE FRAMEWORK OF POWER DISTRIBUTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31958/alushuliy.v3i2.13724Keywords:
Constitutional court, positive legislator, power distribution doctrineAbstract
The central focus of this thesis is to examine the boundaries of the Constitutional Court's authority as a Positive Legislator within the framework of the Doctrine of Power Distribution. The study aims to identify and define the limits of the Constitutional Court's role as a Positive Legislator while exploring its implications within the broader constitutional framework.
This research employs a normative juridical (library research) approach with a qualitative typology. Primary data sources include the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, Law Number 24 of 2003 concerning the Constitutional Court, Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections, and various Constitutional Court decisions. Secondary legal materials, such as relevant books and journals, complement the primary data to provide a comprehensive analysis.
The findings of this study reveal two key points. First, regarding the Constitutional Court's decisions with elements of positive legislator authority, cases such as Decision Number 60/PUU-XXII/2024 and Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 illustrate how the Court's rulings can develop and modify legal norms. These decisions demonstrate that the Constitutional Court, through its role as a Positive Legislator, may issue rulings that adapt laws to societal contexts and needs, provided they remain consistent with the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
Second, concerning the limits of the Constitutional Court's authority, its jurisdiction is explicitly outlined in Article 24C paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution and Article 10 paragraph (1) of the Constitutional Court Law. These provisions empower the Court to review laws against the Constitution, adjudicate disputes over the authority of state institutions as defined by the Constitution, resolve cases involving the dissolution of political parties, and settle disputes over election results. In its judicial review capacity, the Constitutional Court traditionally acts as a Negative Legislator by nullifying norms that contradict the Constitution. However, in certain cases, such as Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023, the Court assumes the role of a Positive Legislator by creating or introducing new legal norms, thereby expanding its influence within the legal system.
References
Ali Akhbar Abaib Mas rabbani Lubis, M. (2019) Ilmu Hukum Dalam Simpul Siyasah Dusturiyah Refleksi atas Teori dan Praktek Hukum Tata Negara di Indonesi. Yogyakarta: Semesta Aksara.
Asshidiqie, J. (2009) Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. Jakarta: Raha Grafindo.
Sudirman, A. (2007) Hati Nurani Hakim dan Putusannya: Suatu pendekatan dari Perspektif Ilmu Hukum Perilaku (Behavioral Jurisprudensi) Kasus Hakim Bismar Siregar. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Syah, I.M. (1999) Filsafat Hukum Islam. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Syarifuddin, A. (2011) Ushul Fiqh 1. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Handoko, D. (2015) Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia. Pekanbaru: Hawa dan Ahwa.
Huda, D.N. (2019) Teori & Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Bandung: Nusa Media.
Iqbal, M. (2016) Fiqh Siyasah: Kontekstualisasi Doktrin Politik Islam. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Jimly Asshiddiqie (2006) Setengah Abad Jimly Assiddiqie, Konstitusi dan Semangat Kebangsaan. Jakarta: PT. Sumber Agung.
Faiz, M.P. (2016) Relevansi Doktrin Negative Legislator. Jakarta: Majalah Konstitusi.
Konstitusi, T.P.H.A.M. (2010) Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi, Sekertariat Jendral Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Kusnardi, M. (1983) Pengantar Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Jakarta: CV. Sinar Bakti.
Dr. Maruarar Siahaan, S.H. (2011) Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi republik Indonesia. edisi ke 2. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Dr. Ni’matul Huda, SH, Mhum& R. Nazriyag, SH, M. (2019) Teori & Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Bandung: Nusa Media.
Qamar, N., & Rezah, F. S. (2020). Ilmu dan Teknik Pembentuka Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn).
Ranggawidjaja, R. (1996) Teknik Perancangan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Bandung: Cita Bhakti Akademika
Martitah (2016) MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI dari Negative Legislature ke Positive Legislature?
Mardian, W. (2019) Kebijakan Hukum Terbuka dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Konsep dan Kajian dalam Pembatasan Kebebasan Pembentuk Undang - Undang. Depok: Rajawali Pers.
Mohhamd Mahrus Ali (2019) Tafsir Konstitusi dan Legalitas Norma Menguji Konstitusionalitas dan Legalitas Norma. Depok: Rajawali Pers.
Ulamai, H.A. (2016) Konsep Nasikh Dan Mansukh Dalam AlQuran.
Widayati (2015) Rekonstruksi Kedudukan TAP MPR Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.
Perundang-Undangan
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
Undang-Undang No. 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman
Undang-Undang No.24 tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi
Undang-Undang Nomor 7 tahun 2017 Tentang Pemilihan Umum
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 60/PUU-XXII/2024
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 28/PUU-XI/2013
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 1/PUUXI/2013
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 75/PUU-VIII/2010
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 102/PUU-VII/2009
Jurnal
Ali, M.M. (2015) ‘Konstitusional dan Legalitas Norma dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang dasar 1945’, Jurnal Konstitusi, 12
Berry, M.F. (2018) ‘Pembentukan Teori Peraturan - Perundang-Undangan’, Muhammadiyah Law Review, 2(2), p. 89.
Busthami, D. (2018) ‘Kekuasaan Kehakiman Dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum Di Indonesia’, Masalah-Masalah Hukum,
Cholilalah, Rois Arifin, A.I.H. (1967) ‘Penerapan Penggunaan Irah-Irah “Demi Keadilan Berdasarkan Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa” Dalam Konteks Pencapaian Keadilan’, Angewandte Chemie International Edition.
Esfandiari, F. dkk (2012) ‘Positive Legislature Konstitusi di Indonesia’, Jurnal Hukum [Preprint].
Falen, B. (2019) ‘KEWENANGAN DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT DALAM HAL PEMANGGILAN PAKSA PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NO. 16/PUU-XVI/2018 PERSPEKTIF FIQH SIYASAH DUSTURIYAH’, repository radenintan, (2), pp. 1–13.
Idris, M. and Umar, K. (2020) ‘Dinamika Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Memutus Perkara Judicial Review’, Siyasatuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Siyasah Syar’Iyyah,
IFDIKA, I. (2023) ‘PEMBERHENTIAN HAKIM MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI MENURUT HUKUM TATA NEGARA DAN FIQH SIYASAH DUSTURIYAH (STUDI TERHADAP PEMBERHENTIAN HAKIM ASWANTO)’.
Katrino, I. (2021) ‘Peraturan Presiden Nomor 10 Tahun 2021 Tentang Bidang Penanaman Modal Perspektif Siyāsah Tasyrīʻiyyah’, Staatsrecht: Jurnal Hukum Kenegaraan dan Politik Islam, 1(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.14421/staatsrecht.v1i2.2474.
Nurhayati, S. (2015) ‘Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Positive Legisture Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945’, Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum.
Nanang Sri Darmadi, SH., M. (1970) ‘KEDUDUKAN DAN WEWENANG MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM SISTEM HUKUM KETATANEGARAAN INDONESIA Oleh : Nanang Sri Darmadi, SH., MH Dosen Fakultas Hukum UNISSULA’, Kedudukan dan Wewenang Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2
Pujiastuti, E. (2016) ‘Penerapan Konsep Trias Politica dalam Sistem Pemerintahan republik Indonesia"’, Jurnal Dinamika Sosial Budaya [Preprint].
Raihan, W. A. (2021). Pengertian Negara.
Rais, M. (2022) ‘Negara Hukun Indonesia: Gagasan dan Penerapannya’, Jurnal Hukum Unsulbar
Rahmalia, A. and Putra, R.P. (2022) ‘Nasikh Wa Al-Mansukh’, El-Mu’Jam. Jurnal Kajian Al Qur’an dan Al-Hadis, 2(1), pp. 28–38.
Revivo Tulaseket, Toar Neman Pailingan, L.S. (2020) ‘Praktik Judicial Activism dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia’, lex adminietratum,
Rosidin, D.U. (2018) ‘Implementasi Prinsip Check and Balance dalam Sistem pemerintahan Indonesia: Menyoal Kasus Pencatutan Nama Presiden’.
Sari, A.F.P. and Raharjo, P.S. (2022) ‘Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Negative Legislator Dan Positive Legislator’,
Saunders, C. (2021) ‘Constitutional Review’, The Constitution of Australia,
Sari, A.F.P. and Raharjo, P.S. (2022) ‘Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Negative Legislator Dan Positive Legislator’
Sihombing, R.R. (2019) ‘Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Yang Memuat Norma Baru Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 102/PUU-VII/2009)’, Tesis, 7(5), pp. 1–170.
Sugiono Margi and Maulida Khazanah (2022) ‘Kedudukan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Kelembagaan Negara’, Jurnal Rechten: Riset Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 1(3).
Syuhada, S. dkk (2021) ‘Analisis siyasah Al-Qadhaiyah terhadap putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 39 P/Hum/2018 Tentang uji Materil peraturan Gubernur Aceh Nomor 5/2018’, Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Anita Vebriani, Zainuddin Zainuddin, Wardatun Nabilah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a?áCreative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License?áthat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See?áThe Effect of Open Access).
?á
?á
