LEGAL CERTAINTY IN EXPRESSING OPINIONS IN PUBLIC DURING THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION ERA ACCORDING TO POSITIVE LAW IN INDONESIA AND SIYASAH DUSTURIYAH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31958/alushuliy.v3i1.12380Keywords:
Legal Certainty, Freedom of Expressioan, Industrial RevolutionAbstract
This research aims to identify and explain the forms of restrictions on freedom of expression on social media and the forms of legal certainty regarding freedom of expression according to positive law and siyasah dusturiyah. In recent years, there have been efforts to narrow the space for expressing opinions, especially through social media. Often, people who express their opinions on social media receive unfavorable treatment after expressing their views. The type of research in this thesis is normative legal research with a statute approach and case approach. The primary data sources in this research are the Quran and Sunnah, as well as laws related to the right to freedom of expression in Indonesia. The data collection technique used in this research involves library research by searching for books, articles, journals, and websites. The data analysis technique in this research is descriptive. The research results show that, first, the forms of restrictions on freedom of expression on social media can be categorized into two forms: indirect and direct. Indirectly, through ambiguous articles in the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE) and articles related to insulting the president and the government. Directly, through digital attacks, persecution, terror and intimidation, and criminal reporting or criminalization. Second, the forms of legal certainty in positive law were found to be in three forms: legal certainty guarantees through individual or group rights, legal certainty guarantees through the government's obligation to protect individuals who use their right to freedom of expression, and legal certainty in the form of sanctions against those who attempt to hinder others' freedom of expression. Third, from the perspective of siyasah dusturiyah, there is also legal certainty for freedom of expression through the right to express opinions and the obligation of rulers to protect those who express their views. Based on the research results, it was found that restrictions on freedom of expression have occurred, which will ultimately lead to authoritarian governance. This occurs due to the suboptimal performance of the government, making it averse to criticism and resorting to restricting freedom of expression.However, it prohibits excessive and wasteful consumption patterns, categorized as al-israf behavior.References
Daftar pustaka
Dewi Sadiah, Dewi. “Metode Penelitian Dakwah Pendekatan Kualitatif Dan Kuantitatif,” 2015.
DM, Mohd Yusuf, dan Geofani Milthree Saragih. “LARANGAN PERNIKAHAN BEDA AGAMA DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA.” Lakidende Law Review 1, no. 3 (2022): 233–42.
Gumilang, Galang Surya. “Metode penelitian kualitatif dalam bidang bimbingan dan konseling.” Jurnal Fokus Konseling 2, no. 2 (2016).
Habsy, Bakhrudin All. “Seni memehami penelitian kuliatatif dalam bimbingan dan konseling: studi literatur.” Jurnal Konseling Andi Matappa 1, no. 2 (2017): 90–100.
Hakim, Lukman, dan Muhamad Risqil Azizi. “HIFZH AL-DIN SEBAGAI KONSIDERAN HUKUM PERNIKAHAN BEDA AGAMA DALAM PERSPEKTIF FIQH AL-MAQASHID,” 2023.
Hidayat, M Taufiq, Ali Nu, Ashabul Yamin, Kasuwi Saiban, dan Universitas Merdeka Malang. “Hukum Islam dan Hukum di Indonesia tentang Pernikahan Beda Agama” 3 (n.d.): 11–27.
Kaharuddin, Kaharuddin, dan Syafruddin Syafruddin. “Pernikahan Beda Agama Dan Dampak Terhadap Pendidikan Agama Anak.” SANGAJI: Jurnal Pemikiran Syariah dan Hukum 4, no. 1 (2020): 53–81. https://doi.org/10.52266/sangaji.v4i1.479.
Kurniawan, Itok Dwi, dan Hanuring Putri Ap. “Kebijakan Pencatatan Perkawinan Beda Agama” 16, no. 02 (2023): 23–30.
Kusnadi, Hendri, dan Albert I Ketut Deni Wijaya. “Dampak Pernikahan Beda Agama Terhadap Keterlibatan Hidup Menggereja Sebagai Umat Beriman Kristiani.” JPAK: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Katolik 19, no. 2 (2019): 15–27. https://doi.org/10.34150/jpak.v19i2.239.
Mahasin, Ashwab. “Keabsahan dan Dampak Perkawinan Beda Agama” 2, no. 1 (2022): 16–23.
Markus, Elia Juan, Rr Ani Wijayati, dan L Elly A M Pandiangan. “Analisis Pelaksanaan Perkawinan Beda Agama di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum to-ra: Hukum Untuk Mengatur dan Melindungi Masyarakat 9, no. 1 (2023): 24–37.
Mursalin, Ayub. “Legalitas Perkawinan Beda Agama : Mengungkap Disparitas Putusan Pengadilan di Indonesia” 6, no. 1 (2023): 113–50. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.6.1.113-150.
Nugrahani, Farida, dan M Hum. “Metode penelitian kualitatif.” Solo: Cakra Books 1, no. 1 (2014).
Pertiwi, A. Trisnawati Ayu, dan Arsin Lukman. “Keabsahan Akta Notaris Pewarisan Beda Agama Ditinjau Dari Hukum Islam dan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.” JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan) 7, no. 1 (2023): 82–88. https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v7i1.4018.
Putri, Novita Misika, Tantan Hermansah, dan Kiky Rizky. “Problematika Sosial Dan Keagamaan Dalam Keluarga Beda Agama Di Desa Sendangmulyo Kabupaten Kulon Progo Yogyakarta.” Alamtara: Jurnal Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam 5, no. 2 (2021): 103–26.
Romli, Muhammad, Nurul Huda, dan Aspandi Aspandi. “Interfaith Marriage Registry in Indonesia Pencatatan Perkawinan Beda Agama di Indonesia” 7, no. 2 (2022): 377–405. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31538/adlh.v7i2.2877.
Salsabila, Unik Hanifah, Windi Mega Lestari, Riasatul Habibah, Oqy Andaresta, dan Diah Yulianingsih. “Pemanfaatan teknologi media pembelajaran di masa pandemi covid-19.” Trapsila: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar 2, no. 2 (2020): 1–13.
Sekarbuana, Made Widya, Ida Ayu Putu Widiawati, dan I Wayan Arthanaya. “Perkawinan Beda Agama dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia.” Jurnal Preferensi Hukum 2, no. 1 (2021): 16–21.
Utami, Hartini Dwi, dan I Ketut Oka Setiawan. “Kajian Perkawinan Beda Agama Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perkawinan di Indonesia (Studi Kasus Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta Nomor 333/Pdt. P/2018/PN. Skt).” Imanot: Jurnal Kemahasiswaan Hukum & Kenotariatan 1, no. 2 (2022): 402–28.
Yonesta, Febi, Muhamad Isnur, Nurkholis Hidayat, Handika Febrian, Irma Latifah Sihite, dan Ahmad Biky. Agama, Negara, dan Hak Asasi Manusia: Proses Pengujian UU 1/PNPS/1965 Tentang Pencegahan, Penyalahgunaan, Dan/atau Pengodaan Agama di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta Legal Aid Institute, 2012.
Zellatifanny, Cut Medika, dan Bambang Mudjiyanto. “Tipe penelitian deskripsi dalam ilmu komunikasi.” Diakom: Jurnal Media Dan Komunikasi 1, no. 2 (2018): 83–90.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Bambang Nurdiansyah, Sulastri Caniago, Wardatun Nabilah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a?áCreative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License?áthat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See?áThe Effect of Open Access).
?á
?á
