Declinatoir Exception Rejection Analysis on The Application of The Principles of Simple Fast and Low Costs in Murabahah Financing in The Bukittinggi Religious Courts

Authors

  • Afkar Afkar Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar
  • Elimartati Elimartati Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar
  • Farida Arianti Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar
  • Zikra Rahmi Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31958/jtm.v10i2.13121

Keywords:

Murabahah Financing, Religious Courts, Declinatory Exceptions, Judicial Efficiency, Legal Principles

Abstract

This research examines the application of the principles of fast, simple, and low-cost proceedings in murabahah financing disputes at the Bukittinggi Religious Courts. Specifically, it addresses the issue of declinatory exceptions filed by defendants, which impact the efficiency of the judicial process. These principles are critical for ensuring effective and equitable access to justice. The study aims to analyze the impact of rejecting declinatory exceptions on the trial process in murabahah financing cases. It also evaluates how the principles of fast, simple, and low-cost judicial proceedings are implemented in such disputes. A qualitative research method with a case study approach was employed. Data collection involved analyzing case records, judicial decisions, and related legal principles to understand the implications of declinatory exceptions on court efficiency. The findings indicate that the rejection of the declinatory exception by the panel of judges led to delays in the trial process without valid legal justification. The interim decision, which affirmed the Bukittinggi Religious Court's authority, contradicted the principle of expedited proceedings, thus increasing trial duration and costs. The study concludes that rejecting declinatory exceptions without proper justification undermines the principles of fast, simple, and low-cost trials. Judicial practices should align with these principles to improve efficiency in murabahah financing dispute resolution.

References

Al Husaeni, D. F., Nandiyanto, A. B. D., & Maryanti, R. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of educational research in 2017 to 2021 using VOSviewer: Google scholar indexed research. Indonesian Journal of Teaching in Science, 3(1).

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Eck, N. J. van, & Waltman, L. (2020). VOSviewer Manual version 1 .6.16. Univeristeit Leiden.

Fasa, M. I. (2016). SUKUK : TEORI DAN IMPLEMENTASI. Li Falah: Jurnal Studi Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.31332/lifalah.v1i1.476

Harzing, A. W. (2007). Publish or perish software. Available At.

Jacsó, P. (2009). Calculating the h-index and other bibliometric and scientometric indicators from Google Scholar with the Publish or Perish software. Online Information Review, 33(6). https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520911011070

Khan, A., Goodell, J. W., Hassan, M. K., & Paltrinieri, A. (2022). A bibliometric review of finance bibliometric papers. Finance Research Letters, 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102520

Kuzior, A., & Sira, M. (2022). A Bibliometric Analysis of Blockchain Technology Research Using VOSviewer. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138206

Ledhem, M. A. (2022). Does Sukuk financing boost economic growth? Empirical evidence from Southeast Asia. PSU Research Review, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/PRR-09-2020-0028

Mif Rohim, N. S., & Shereeza, M. S. (2013). Analysis on the thoughts of Imam Abu Hanifah and Imam Syafi’i on the Ijtihad method for Sukuk instrument. Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences and Engineering), 62(1). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v62.1205

Mukherjee, D., Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., & Donthu, N. (2022). Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research. Journal of Business Research, 148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.042

Nandiyanto, A. B. D., Biddinika, M. K., & Triawan, F. (2020). How bibliographic dataset portrays decreasing number of scientific publication from Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/ijost.v5i1.22265

Ninkov, A., Frank, J. R., & Maggio, L. A. (2022). Bibliometrics: Methods for studying academic publishing. Perspectives on Medical Education, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00695-4

Prayitno, M. A., Haryani, S., Wardani, S., Wijayati, N., Sutikno, S., Indriyanti, D. R., & Ellianawati, E. (2022). A Systematic Review on Chemo-entrepreneurship. ISET.

Ramos-Rodrígue, A. R., & Ruíz-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980-2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25(10). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.397

Smaoui, H., & Nechi, S. (2017). Does sukuk market development spur economic growth? Research in International Business and Finance, 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.04.018

Tan, Y. L., & Mohamad Shafi, R. (2021). Capital market and economic growth in Malaysia: the role of ṣukūk and other sub-components. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-04-2019-0066

Ubaidillah, U., Masyhuri, M., & Wahyuni, N. (2021). Cash Waqf Linked Sukuk (CWLS): An Alternative Instrument for Infrastructure Financing. Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 4(1). https://doi.org/10.31538/iijse.v4i1.1473

Yıldırım, S., Yıldırım, D. C., & Diboglu, P. (2020). Does Sukuk market development promote economic growth? PSU Research Review, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/PRR-03-2020-0011

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30