The Reversal of the Burden of Proof; Between Presumption of Innocence and Presumption of Guilt
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31958/jeh.v8i1.8996Keywords:
Reverse Proof, Presumption of Innocence, Presumption of GuiltAbstract
Actory in cumbit onus probandi was a basic principle in the law of proof which teaches that whoever demands it must prove it. This basic principle is implemented in the integrated criminal justice system and becomes the authority of the Public Prosecutor and ends with the defendant, the derivative of this principle is actore non probante reus absolvitur. However, in the renewal of criminal law, especially in eradicating corruption as a predicate crime, there has been a shift in the burden of proof, which can start with the accused first. This shifting burden of proof is certainly in conflict with the general principle of criminal procedural law which emphasizes the presumption of innocence. These clashes are not intended to become obstacles in the process of enforcing criminal law, especially in cases of corruption as an extra ordinary crime, so extra ordinary measures are needed to eradicate it. So reversing the burden of proof as one of the efforts that can be accounted for its truth in theory and philosophy, especially the purpose of law is not just legal certainty, but also justice and usefulness so that reversing the burden of proof can provide benefits in accelerating the eradication of criminal acts of corruption.
References
Al-jawi, A. I. ‘Ali A.-F. (1951). Tarjuman Al-Mustafid. Maktabah Wa Mathba’ah Sulaiman Mu’i.
Arisiana, T., & Prasetiawati, E. (2019). Wawasan Al-Qur’an Tentang Khamr Menurut Al-Qurthubi Dalam Tafsir Al-Jami’Li Ahkam Al-Qur’an. Fikri: Jurnal ….
Baidan, N. (2016). Metodologi Penafsiran Al-Qur’an. Pustaka Pelajar.
Dalam, K., & Semanalisis, P. (2020). Analisis Semiotika Pada Teks Al- Qur ’ an Tentang Intertekstualitas Julia Kristeva. Substantia,Volume 22,No.I April 2020, 22(April).
Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia tentang Bunga (Interest/Fa’idah), Himpunan Fatwa MUI (2004).
Faifi, S. S. ahmad Y. al-. (2014). Ringkasan Fiqh Sunnah Sayid Sabiq (Cet. 2). Pustaka Al-Kautsar.
Gusmian, I. (2013). Khazanah Tafsir Indonesia Dari Hermeneutika hingga Ideologi. LKiS.
Gusmian, I. (2016). Paradigma Penelitian Tafsir Al-Qur’an Di Indonesia. Empirisma, 24(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.30762/empirisma.v24i1.1
Herawati, W. P., & Rachmawati, A. (2020). Hukuman Bagi Peminum Khamr Pada Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Klaten No 148/Pid.C/2018/ PN.Kln Dalam Tinjauan Fiqh Islam (Studi Perbandingan). Journal of Indonesian Comparative of Law. https://doi.org/10.21111/jicl.v3i1.4514
Herdiansyah, H. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif untuk Ilmu-ilmu Sosial (Cet. 3). Salemba Humanika.
Jamal, M. (2019). Abd Rauf Al-Sinkily dan Karya Tafsirnya (Telaah atas Metodologi Kitab Tafsir Tarjuman al-Mustafid). AL ASAS.
Jamaludin, M. A., Ramli, M. A., & Mat, D. (2011). Isu Penggunaan Alkohol Dalam Penghasilan Produk Gunaan Semasa. Isu Penggunaan Alkohol Dalam Penghasilan Produk Gunaan Semasa : Analisis Dari Perspektif Hukum Islam.
Latifah Mohd Noor, Siti Rubaini Mat, Norhakim Dhiaudin, & Afif Ariffin. (2018). Alkohol : Definisi , Pengharaman , Metabolisme Dan Kegunaannya [ Alcohol : Definition , Prohibition , Metabolism and Its Usage ]. The Malaysian Journal of Islamic Sciences.
Lukmanudin, M. I. (2015). Legitimasi Hadis Pelarangan Penggunaan Alkohol dalam Pengobatan. JOURNAL OF QUR’AN AND HADITH STUDIES. https://doi.org/10.15408/quhas.v4i1.2284
Masjkur, M. (2017). PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOBA DI KALANGAN REMAJA DALAM PERSPEKTIF ISLAM. At-Tuhfah. https://doi.org/10.36840/jurnalstudikeislaman.v5i9.48
Mustaqim, A. (2015). Metode Penelitian Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir. Idea Press.
MZ, R. D. R. (2019). Alcohol and Khamr in Fiqh Based on Science Perspective. IJISH (International Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities). https://doi.org/10.26555/ijish.v2i1.859
Natsir, M., Arbas, C., & Suriyani, M. (2019). Law on Khamr Under Qanun Jinayat in Aceh and Brunei Darussalam: A Comparative Study. Jurnal Media Hukum. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.20190124
Nurmansyah, I. (2019). Kajian Intertekstualitas Tafsir Ayat Ash-Shiyam Karya Muhammad Basiuni Imran Dan Tafsir Al-Manar Karya Muhammad Rasyid Ridha. Al-Bayan: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al- Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 4(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.15575/al-bayan.v4i1.4792
Parray, T. A. (2018). THE QUR’AN IN THE MALAY-INDONESIAN WORLD: CONTEXT AND INTERPRETATION. Edited by Majid Daneshgar, Peter G. Riddel, and Andrew Rippin. New York: Routledge, 2016. Pp. xiv + 261. Cloth, $145.00. Religious Studies Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsr.13496
Prasetiawati, E. (2017). Konsep Pendidikan Anak Menurut Al-Qur’an Perspektif Muhammad Quraish Shihab. TADBIR :Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam.
Putra, A. (2014). Khazanah Tafsir Melayu (Studi Kitab Tafsir Tarjuman Al-Mustafid karya Abd Rauf Al-Sinkili). Jurnal Syahadah Jurnal Ilmu Al-Quran Dan Keislaman, II(II), 69–86.
Rahman, A. (2018). Tafsir Tarjuman AL-MUSTAFÎD Diskursus Biografi , Kontestasi Politis-Teologis ,. Miqot, 13(1), 55.
Roni, M., & Nasution, I. F. A. (2021). The Legality Of Miras (Khamr) in Al-Quran Persfective (Comparative Study of The Tafsir Al-Maraghy, Al-Misbah, and Al-Qurthubi). FITRAH: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman. https://doi.org/10.24952/fitrah.v7i1.3685
Rosyadi, M. I. (2018). PEMIKIRAN HADIS ABDURRAUF AS-SINGKILI DALAM KITAB MAWA’IZAT AL-BADI’AH. Diroyah : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis. https://doi.org/10.15575/diroyah.v2i1.2495
Rouf, A. (2020). Mozaik Tafsir Indonesia Kajian Ensiklopedis. Sahifa Publishing.
Said, H. A. (2018). Mengenal Tafsir Nusantara: Melacak Mata Rantai Tafsir Dari Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Singapura Hingga Brunei Darussalam. Refleksi, 16(2), 205–231. https://doi.org/10.15408/ref.v16i2.10193
Salma, S., Revinda, R., & Hidayat, T. (2020). Perspektif Hukum Islam ( Hadd Al-Syurb ) tentang Aia Niro dan Tuak ( Khamr ) di Nagari Batu Payuang Halaban. Society.
Suryantoro, D. D., & Rofiq, A. (2021). Hudud Syar’iyah Hadd Kharm Dan Minuman Memabukkan Perspektif Hukum Islam. At-Turost : Journal of Islamic Studies. https://doi.org/10.52491/at.v8i1.60
Taqiyudin, I. (n.d.). Kifayatul Ahyar (Juz 1). Maktabah al-Hidayah.
Tentang, S., Dalam, Q. S. A., Ciri, A., Aditif, K., & Hs, M. A. (2019). TAFSIR AL-MISBAH. 18(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.18592/jiiu.v
Tohir, M. (2019). Al- Qur ’an dalam Pandangan Hermeneutika Nasr Hamd Abu Zayd. Al-Thiqah.
Yusuf, M. (2011). Tafsir Ayat Ahkam. AMZAH.
Zaimul Asroor. (2018). Tarjumān Al-Mustafīd: Tafsir Lengkap Pertama Di Nusantara. Ushuluna: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin.
Zaiyadi, A. (2018). Lokalitas Tafsir Nusantara: Dinamika Studi al-Qur’an di Indonesia. Al-Bayan: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadist, 1(1), 01–26. https://doi.org/10.35132/albayan.v1i1.1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Roni Efendi, Ade Adhari, Afrian Raus, Fajar Dian Ariani, Musmuliadin Musmuliadin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:?á
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
